The New Media Landscape and Its Effects on Skin Cancer Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Prevention: Scoping Review.

Q3 Medicine JMIR dermatology Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.2196/53373
Priscilla L Haff, Alli Jacobson, Madison M Taylor, Hayden P Schandua, David P Farris, Hung Q Doan, Kelly C Nelson
{"title":"The New Media Landscape and Its Effects on Skin Cancer Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Prevention: Scoping Review.","authors":"Priscilla L Haff, Alli Jacobson, Madison M Taylor, Hayden P Schandua, David P Farris, Hung Q Doan, Kelly C Nelson","doi":"10.2196/53373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The wide availability of web-based sources, including social media (SM), has supported rapid, widespread dissemination of health information. This dissemination can be an asset during public health emergencies; however, it can also present challenges when the information is inaccurate or ill-informed. Of interest, many SM sources discuss cancer, specifically cutaneous melanoma and keratinocyte cancers (basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Through a comprehensive and scoping review of the literature, this study aims to gain an actionable perspective of the state of SM information regarding skin cancer diagnostics, prognostics, and prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a scoping literature review to establish the relationship between SM and skin cancer. A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2000 to June 2023. The included studies discussed SM and its relationship to and effect on skin cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through the search, 1009 abstracts were initially identified, 188 received full-text review, and 112 met inclusion criteria. The included studies were divided into 7 groupings based on a publication's primary objective: misinformation (n=40, 36%), prevention campaign (n=19, 17%), engagement (n=16, 14%), research (n=12, 11%), education (n=11, 10%), demographics (n=10, 9%), and patient support (n=4, 3%), which were the most common identified themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through this review, we gained a better understanding of the SM environment addressing skin cancer information, and we gained insight into the best practices by which SM could be used to positively influence the health care information ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"7 ","pages":"e53373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11036192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The wide availability of web-based sources, including social media (SM), has supported rapid, widespread dissemination of health information. This dissemination can be an asset during public health emergencies; however, it can also present challenges when the information is inaccurate or ill-informed. Of interest, many SM sources discuss cancer, specifically cutaneous melanoma and keratinocyte cancers (basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma).

Objective: Through a comprehensive and scoping review of the literature, this study aims to gain an actionable perspective of the state of SM information regarding skin cancer diagnostics, prognostics, and prevention.

Methods: We performed a scoping literature review to establish the relationship between SM and skin cancer. A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2000 to June 2023. The included studies discussed SM and its relationship to and effect on skin cancer.

Results: Through the search, 1009 abstracts were initially identified, 188 received full-text review, and 112 met inclusion criteria. The included studies were divided into 7 groupings based on a publication's primary objective: misinformation (n=40, 36%), prevention campaign (n=19, 17%), engagement (n=16, 14%), research (n=12, 11%), education (n=11, 10%), demographics (n=10, 9%), and patient support (n=4, 3%), which were the most common identified themes.

Conclusions: Through this review, we gained a better understanding of the SM environment addressing skin cancer information, and we gained insight into the best practices by which SM could be used to positively influence the health care information ecosystem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新媒体格局及其对皮肤癌诊断、预后和预防的影响:范围审查。
背景:包括社交媒体 (SM) 在内的网络信息源的广泛使用支持了卫生信息的快速、广泛传播。在发生公共卫生突发事件时,这种传播方式可以成为一种资产;但是,当信息不准确或信息不足时,它也会带来挑战。值得关注的是,许多 SM 信息源都讨论了癌症,特别是皮肤黑色素瘤和角质细胞癌(基底细胞癌和鳞状细胞癌):本研究旨在通过对文献进行全面的范围性综述,从可操作的角度了解有关皮肤癌诊断、预后和预防的 SM 信息现状:我们进行了范围性文献综述,以确定 SM 与皮肤癌之间的关系。我们对 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间的 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 Scopus 进行了文献检索。纳入的研究讨论了 SM 及其与皮肤癌的关系和对皮肤癌的影响:通过检索,初步确定了 1009 篇摘要,188 篇接受了全文审阅,112 篇符合纳入标准。根据出版物的主要目标,纳入的研究分为 7 组:错误信息(40 篇,占 36%)、预防运动(19 篇,占 17%)、参与(16 篇,占 14%)、研究(12 篇,占 11%)、教育(11 篇,占 10%)、人口统计(10 篇,占 9%)和患者支持(4 篇,占 3%),这些是最常见的主题:通过本次综述,我们更好地了解了处理皮肤癌信息的 SM 环境,并深入了解了 SM 可用来积极影响医疗保健信息生态系统的最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Comparative Sufficiency of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI in Answering Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis Questions About Common Dermatological Diagnoses. The Depth Estimation and Visualization of Dermatological Lesions: Development and Usability Study. Dermatology in Student-Run Clinics in the United States: Scoping Review. Improving Affordability in Dermatology: Cost Savings in Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company Versus GoodRx. Dermatologic Data From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 and the PatientsLikeMe Online Support Community: Comparative Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1