Diagnostic yields and safety of thoracoscopic cryobiopsies in Japan: A single-center retrospective observational study

IF 2.4 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory investigation Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2024.05.001
Miwa Kamatani , Nobuyasu Awano , Minoru Inomata , Naoyuki Kuse , Keita Sakamoto , Toshio Kumasaka , Takehiro Izumo
{"title":"Diagnostic yields and safety of thoracoscopic cryobiopsies in Japan: A single-center retrospective observational study","authors":"Miwa Kamatani ,&nbsp;Nobuyasu Awano ,&nbsp;Minoru Inomata ,&nbsp;Naoyuki Kuse ,&nbsp;Keita Sakamoto ,&nbsp;Toshio Kumasaka ,&nbsp;Takehiro Izumo","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Thoracoscopy is useful for diagnosing unexplained pleural effusions. A sufficient specimen volume is often difficult to obtain using forceps biopsies (FBs) but can be obtained with pleural cryobiopsies (CBs). This study aimed to assess the utility and safety of CB during thoracoscopy in the Japanese population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients who underwent thoracoscopic CBs at the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between January 2017 and August 2023 were included in the study. Data were retrospectively analyzed, including clinical data, thoracoscopic findings, specimen size, diagnostic yield, and complications. The number of collected specimens and the freezing time were left to the discretion of the attending physician.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six patients underwent thoracoscopic CB. Specimens obtained by CB were larger than those obtained by FB. Primary lung cancer was the most common cause of pleural effusion, followed by malignant pleural mesothelioma. CB contributed to the diagnosis in 24 of 26 cases (92.3%) and FB contributed to the diagnosis in 11 of 18 cases (61.1%). Severe fibrosis could be diagnosed in all 3 cases by CB, but not by FB. The common complications of CB included bleeding at the biopsy site and atelectasis, but no severe complications occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The utility and safety of thoracoscopic CB for diagnosing pleural effusions in Japan were verified. The diagnostic yield, specimen size, and safety profile of CB support the diagnostic utility of this method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524000765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Thoracoscopy is useful for diagnosing unexplained pleural effusions. A sufficient specimen volume is often difficult to obtain using forceps biopsies (FBs) but can be obtained with pleural cryobiopsies (CBs). This study aimed to assess the utility and safety of CB during thoracoscopy in the Japanese population.

Methods

Patients who underwent thoracoscopic CBs at the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between January 2017 and August 2023 were included in the study. Data were retrospectively analyzed, including clinical data, thoracoscopic findings, specimen size, diagnostic yield, and complications. The number of collected specimens and the freezing time were left to the discretion of the attending physician.

Results

Twenty-six patients underwent thoracoscopic CB. Specimens obtained by CB were larger than those obtained by FB. Primary lung cancer was the most common cause of pleural effusion, followed by malignant pleural mesothelioma. CB contributed to the diagnosis in 24 of 26 cases (92.3%) and FB contributed to the diagnosis in 11 of 18 cases (61.1%). Severe fibrosis could be diagnosed in all 3 cases by CB, but not by FB. The common complications of CB included bleeding at the biopsy site and atelectasis, but no severe complications occurred.

Conclusions

The utility and safety of thoracoscopic CB for diagnosing pleural effusions in Japan were verified. The diagnostic yield, specimen size, and safety profile of CB support the diagnostic utility of this method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本胸腔镜冷冻生物学检查的诊断率和安全性:单中心回顾性观察研究
背景胸腔镜检查有助于诊断原因不明的胸腔积液。使用镊子活检(FB)往往难以获得足够的标本量,但使用胸膜冷冻活检(CB)则可获得足够的标本量。本研究旨在评估日本人群在胸腔镜检查过程中使用 CB 的实用性和安全性。研究纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间在日本红十字医疗中心接受胸腔镜 CB 检查的患者。对数据进行回顾性分析,包括临床数据、胸腔镜检查结果、标本大小、诊断率和并发症。采集标本的数量和冷冻时间由主治医生决定。CB 取得的标本比 FB 取得的标本大。原发性肺癌是胸腔积液最常见的原因,其次是恶性胸膜间皮瘤。在26例胸腔积液中,有24例(92.3%)是通过CB确诊的,而在18例胸腔积液中,有11例(61.1%)是通过FB确诊的。所有 3 个病例都能通过 CB 诊断出严重纤维化,但不能通过 FB 诊断出严重纤维化。结论 在日本,胸腔镜 CB 诊断胸腔积液的实用性和安全性得到了验证。胸腔镜活检的诊断率、标本大小和安全性都证明了这种方法的诊断效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Association of constipation with the survival of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias Importance of vaccines against respiratory infections in adults Effectiveness and safety of lower dose sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases receiving moderate-to high-dose glucocorticoids Lung cancer with comorbid interstitial pneumonia: Current situation and animal model development Refractory bilateral chylothorax and chylous ascites in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus treated by pleuro-peritoneal and peritoneal-venous shunts along with cell-free and concentrated ascites re-infusion therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1