Efficacy of common decontamination techniques used in eye care facilities in Ghana

Samuel Kyei , George Panyin Annan , Kwame Kumi Asare , Emmanuel Birikorang , Akwasi Anyanful , Randy Asiamah
{"title":"Efficacy of common decontamination techniques used in eye care facilities in Ghana","authors":"Samuel Kyei ,&nbsp;George Panyin Annan ,&nbsp;Kwame Kumi Asare ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Birikorang ,&nbsp;Akwasi Anyanful ,&nbsp;Randy Asiamah","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy of common methods used in the decontamination of non-critical and semi-critical ophthalmic equipment in Ghana.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This study was conducted in two phases. First, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out, followed by a microbiological study</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Questionnaires were distributed online to eye care practitioners. The common decontamination procedures identified from the online questionnaires were used in decontaminating the surfaces of the ophthalmic instruments. Swabs were taken from the instruments both before and immediately after decontamination (within the first 30s), as well as at 10-minute intervals up to 40 minutes after decontamination. The swabs were cultured on nutrient agar for 24 hours at 37 °C, and the contamination levels were estimated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The most commonly used disinfection technique in the selected eye clinics in Ghana was the use of Methylated spirit (34 %), and the least, Iso-alcohol swabs (1 %). All the decontamination methods were efficacious in the reduction of contamination levels on the surfaces of ophthalmic instruments. Hand sanitiser, Parazone (sodium hypochlorite), Autoclave, and UV showed highly effective decontamination activity compared to Methylated spirit, Hydrogen peroxide, and Isopropyl alcohol. There was a significant reduction in contamination for each of the time points (p &lt; 0.001), except for 40 minutes after decontamination (p = 0.063ns), when compared to the contamination level before decontamination.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In Ghana, commonly used decontamination methods are effective in reducing levels of contamination of ophthalmic instruments, with their recontamination rates comparable to the use of autoclaves and UV germicidal irradiation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000248/pdfft?md5=c7b05601dd8d01e938f40b3425829918&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000248-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of common methods used in the decontamination of non-critical and semi-critical ophthalmic equipment in Ghana.

Design

This study was conducted in two phases. First, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out, followed by a microbiological study

Methods

Questionnaires were distributed online to eye care practitioners. The common decontamination procedures identified from the online questionnaires were used in decontaminating the surfaces of the ophthalmic instruments. Swabs were taken from the instruments both before and immediately after decontamination (within the first 30s), as well as at 10-minute intervals up to 40 minutes after decontamination. The swabs were cultured on nutrient agar for 24 hours at 37 °C, and the contamination levels were estimated.

Results

The most commonly used disinfection technique in the selected eye clinics in Ghana was the use of Methylated spirit (34 %), and the least, Iso-alcohol swabs (1 %). All the decontamination methods were efficacious in the reduction of contamination levels on the surfaces of ophthalmic instruments. Hand sanitiser, Parazone (sodium hypochlorite), Autoclave, and UV showed highly effective decontamination activity compared to Methylated spirit, Hydrogen peroxide, and Isopropyl alcohol. There was a significant reduction in contamination for each of the time points (p < 0.001), except for 40 minutes after decontamination (p = 0.063ns), when compared to the contamination level before decontamination.

Conclusion

In Ghana, commonly used decontamination methods are effective in reducing levels of contamination of ophthalmic instruments, with their recontamination rates comparable to the use of autoclaves and UV germicidal irradiation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳眼科医疗机构常用净化技术的功效
目的 评估加纳用于净化非关键和半关键眼科设备的常用方法的功效。首先进行的是描述性横断面研究,然后是微生物研究。在对眼科器械表面进行去污时,使用了从网上调查问卷中确定的常用去污程序。在除污前、除污后(前 30 秒内)以及除污后 40 分钟内每隔 10 分钟从器械上取一次拭子。结果在加纳选定的眼科诊所中,最常用的消毒技术是甲基化酒精(34%),最少的是异丙醇棉签(1%)。所有净化方法都能有效降低眼科器械表面的污染水平。与甲基化酒精、过氧化氢和异丙醇相比,手部消毒剂、Parazone(次氯酸钠)、高压灭菌器和紫外线显示出非常有效的去污活性。与去污前的污染水平相比,除去污后 40 分钟(p = 0.063ns)外,每个时间点的污染水平都有明显下降(p < 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant concomitant to cataract surgery in retinitis pigmentosa: potential retinal preservation effect FaceFinder: A machine learning tool for identification of facial images from heterogenous datasets Gender based differences in electronic medical record utilization in an academic ophthalmology practice Evolving practice patterns of young retinal specialists: A five-year comparison of treatment and surgical preferences Candida parapsilosis keratitis: A case series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1