Application of a terminal schedule probe method to inform schedule thinning with multiple schedules

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of applied behavior analysis Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1002/jaba.1081
Craig W. Strohmeier, Mirela Cengher, Michelle D. Chin, John Michael Falligant
{"title":"Application of a terminal schedule probe method to inform schedule thinning with multiple schedules","authors":"Craig W. Strohmeier,&nbsp;Mirela Cengher,&nbsp;Michelle D. Chin,&nbsp;John Michael Falligant","doi":"10.1002/jaba.1081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple schedules are effective at decreasing challenging behavior and maintaining alternative behavior at acceptable levels. Currently, no conclusive guidance is available for empirically deriving multiple-schedule components (continuous reinforcement for alternative behavior and extinction for challenging behavior [discriminative stimulus] and extinction for both alternative and challenging behavior [delta stimulus]) during the schedule-thinning process. In the current investigation, we describe a terminal schedule probe method to determine delta stimulus starting points and strategies for subsequent schedule-thinning progressions to reach caregiver-informed terminal schedules. We review schedule-thinning outcomes for a clinical cohort using a consecutive controlled case series approach and report results for two groups: One group included applications of terminal probe thinning (<i>n</i> = 24), and the other involved traditional dense-to-lean thinning (<i>n</i> = 18). Outcomes suggest that the terminal schedule probe method produced effective treatments with less resurgence of challenging behavior and leaner, more feasible, multiple schedules.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"57 3","pages":"676-694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.1081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple schedules are effective at decreasing challenging behavior and maintaining alternative behavior at acceptable levels. Currently, no conclusive guidance is available for empirically deriving multiple-schedule components (continuous reinforcement for alternative behavior and extinction for challenging behavior [discriminative stimulus] and extinction for both alternative and challenging behavior [delta stimulus]) during the schedule-thinning process. In the current investigation, we describe a terminal schedule probe method to determine delta stimulus starting points and strategies for subsequent schedule-thinning progressions to reach caregiver-informed terminal schedules. We review schedule-thinning outcomes for a clinical cohort using a consecutive controlled case series approach and report results for two groups: One group included applications of terminal probe thinning (n = 24), and the other involved traditional dense-to-lean thinning (n = 18). Outcomes suggest that the terminal schedule probe method produced effective treatments with less resurgence of challenging behavior and leaner, more feasible, multiple schedules.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用终端计划探测法,为多计划的计划精简提供信息。
多重强化计划能有效减少挑战行为,并将替代行为维持在可接受的水平。目前,还没有确凿的指导意见,可用于在缩减时间表的过程中,根据经验推导出多重时间表的组成部分(对替代行为进行持续强化,对挑战行为进行消减[辨别刺激],对替代行为和挑战行为都进行消减[三角刺激])。在本次调查中,我们介绍了一种终端计划表探究方法,用于确定三角刺激的起始点和后续计划表细化过程的策略,以达到由照顾者提供信息的终端计划表。我们采用连续对照病例系列的方法回顾了临床队列的时间表稀释结果,并报告了两组的结果:其中一组应用了终端探针稀疏法(n = 24),另一组应用了传统的从密到疏的稀疏法(n = 18)。结果表明,末端计划探针法治疗效果显著,挑战性行为复发率较低,而且更精简、更可行、多计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the social acceptability of the Re-Connect concept: A smartphone-based, nonfinancial, contingency management intervention. Contingency management for monosubstance use disorders: Systematic review and assessment of predicted versus obtained effects. Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices. Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior by domesticated canines. Effects of social interaction on leisure item preference and reinforcer efficacy for children with autism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1