Effect of Delayed Cord Clamping on Breastfeeding Behaviors During the First Breastfeed: A Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breastfeeding Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1089/bfm.2024.0080
Nihan Hilal Hoşağası, Sami Güngör
{"title":"Effect of Delayed Cord Clamping on Breastfeeding Behaviors During the First Breastfeed: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Nihan Hilal Hoşağası, Sami Güngör","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2024.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Delayed cord clamping (DCC) may increase the success of breastfeeding by improving neurological and cardiovascular function in neonates. In this study, we investigated the impact of DCC on breastfeeding behaviors, neonatal activity status, and maternal satisfaction during the first breastfeeding. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Turkey with 100 term infants delivered by elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. The participants were randomly assigned to the early cord clamping (ECC) group or DCC group. The Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) was used to assess infant alertness, breastfeeding behaviors, and maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding within the first 2 hours of life. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Scores on the IBFAT were significantly higher in the DCC group compared with the ECC group (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding did not differ between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.3). Infant alertness tended to be better in the DCC group, but the difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.08). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The results of this study indicated that DCC was associated with more favorable breastfeeding behaviors compared with ECC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Delayed cord clamping (DCC) may increase the success of breastfeeding by improving neurological and cardiovascular function in neonates. In this study, we investigated the impact of DCC on breastfeeding behaviors, neonatal activity status, and maternal satisfaction during the first breastfeeding. Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Turkey with 100 term infants delivered by elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. The participants were randomly assigned to the early cord clamping (ECC) group or DCC group. The Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) was used to assess infant alertness, breastfeeding behaviors, and maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding within the first 2 hours of life. Results: Scores on the IBFAT were significantly higher in the DCC group compared with the ECC group (p = 0.02). Maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding did not differ between the groups (p = 0.3). Infant alertness tended to be better in the DCC group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that DCC was associated with more favorable breastfeeding behaviors compared with ECC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延迟脐带剪断对首次哺乳期母乳喂养行为的影响:随机对照研究
目的延迟脐带夹闭(DCC)可改善新生儿的神经和心血管功能,从而提高母乳喂养的成功率。在这项研究中,我们调查了延迟脐带夹闭对母乳喂养行为、新生儿活动状态和首次母乳喂养期间产妇满意度的影响。研究方法这项随机对照研究在土耳其的一家三级医院进行,100 名足月儿在脊髓麻醉下通过选择性剖腹产分娩。参与者被随机分配到早期脐带钳夹(ECC)组或DCC组。婴儿母乳喂养评估工具(IBFAT)用于评估婴儿的警觉性、母乳喂养行为以及母亲对出生后 2 小时内母乳喂养的满意度。结果DCC 组的 IBFAT 分数明显高于 ECC 组(p = 0.02)。母亲对母乳喂养的满意度在各组之间没有差异(p = 0.3)。DCC组的婴儿警觉性更高,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.08)。结论本研究结果表明,DCC 与 ECC 相比,DCC 与更有利的母乳喂养行为相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Breastfeeding Experiences of Mothers of Children with Down Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. Factors Associated with Inequities in Donor Milk Bank Access Among Different Hospitals. Factors Associated with Weaning in Infants with Cow's Milk Allergy: A Cohort Study. Oral Care Performed with Breast Milk in Preterm Newborns Fed by Tube: A Randomized Controlled Study. The Interaction of Race and Pregnancy Intentions on Breastfeeding Initiation Rates and Duration in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1