Effect of intra-ovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma on the patients with a poor ovarian response (POR) or premature ovarian insufficiency (POI): a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.6 Q4 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Middle East Fertility Society Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1186/s43043-024-00180-y
Prashanth K. Adiga, Nicola Marconi, Ravishankar N, Srisailesh Vitthala
{"title":"Effect of intra-ovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma on the patients with a poor ovarian response (POR) or premature ovarian insufficiency (POI): a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Prashanth K. Adiga, Nicola Marconi, Ravishankar N, Srisailesh Vitthala","doi":"10.1186/s43043-024-00180-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"POR or POI poses a significant challenge to fertility treatment with different ovarian stimulation strategies. Intra-ovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been hypothesised to improve ovarian reserve and pregnancies in POI or POR. However, its effectiveness on pregnancy, embryology and ovarian reserve outcomes need to be established. Therefore, we systematically searched databases based on PRISMA guidelines that reported on the effects of intra-ovarian autologous PRP injections in sub-fertile women with POI and POR. The following outcome effects were analysed by random model and included in the meta-analysis in pre- and post-PRP injection groups of POI & POR: (a) pregnancy rates, rate of oocyte & embryo formation (b) ovarian reserve markers (Antral follicular count, Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone). A separate analysis of pregnancies, AFC and AMH was done in POI and POR groups and in age groups < 35 years and > 35 years. A total of 12 studies were included. The estimated overall effects size of the log odds ratio (log OR = 2.03; 95% CI = 0.13 to 3.92; P = 0.04; I2 = 0.42) favoured post-PRP with a moderate level of evidence. There are no significant differences in POI/POR and those with < 35 years or > 35 years. The pooled standard difference of means favoured the post-PRP injection group significantly with regards to rates of embryo formation (1.39; 95% CI = 0.56 to 2.21; P = 0.02; I2 = 46%.), Oocyte (0.84; 95% CI = -1.3 to 3.0; P = 0.24; I 2 93%), Antral follicle count (1.78; 95% CI = 0.73 to 2.84; P = 0.01. I2 = 97%) with a low level of evidence and Anti-Mullerian Hormone (1.11; 95% CI = 0.16 to 2.05; P = 0.03; I2 = 96%) with low level of evidence. Our study shows that intraovarian PRP injection was associated with no significant increase in the rates of pregnancy, in the rates of pregnancy, oocyte, embryo formation, Anti-Mullerian Hormone and antral follicle count. Live birth rates were not calculated. There was no statistical difference between POR/POI and those with < 35 years or > 35 years. Further randomized studies are warranted to confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":18532,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Fertility Society Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Fertility Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-024-00180-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

POR or POI poses a significant challenge to fertility treatment with different ovarian stimulation strategies. Intra-ovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been hypothesised to improve ovarian reserve and pregnancies in POI or POR. However, its effectiveness on pregnancy, embryology and ovarian reserve outcomes need to be established. Therefore, we systematically searched databases based on PRISMA guidelines that reported on the effects of intra-ovarian autologous PRP injections in sub-fertile women with POI and POR. The following outcome effects were analysed by random model and included in the meta-analysis in pre- and post-PRP injection groups of POI & POR: (a) pregnancy rates, rate of oocyte & embryo formation (b) ovarian reserve markers (Antral follicular count, Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone). A separate analysis of pregnancies, AFC and AMH was done in POI and POR groups and in age groups < 35 years and > 35 years. A total of 12 studies were included. The estimated overall effects size of the log odds ratio (log OR = 2.03; 95% CI = 0.13 to 3.92; P = 0.04; I2 = 0.42) favoured post-PRP with a moderate level of evidence. There are no significant differences in POI/POR and those with < 35 years or > 35 years. The pooled standard difference of means favoured the post-PRP injection group significantly with regards to rates of embryo formation (1.39; 95% CI = 0.56 to 2.21; P = 0.02; I2 = 46%.), Oocyte (0.84; 95% CI = -1.3 to 3.0; P = 0.24; I 2 93%), Antral follicle count (1.78; 95% CI = 0.73 to 2.84; P = 0.01. I2 = 97%) with a low level of evidence and Anti-Mullerian Hormone (1.11; 95% CI = 0.16 to 2.05; P = 0.03; I2 = 96%) with low level of evidence. Our study shows that intraovarian PRP injection was associated with no significant increase in the rates of pregnancy, in the rates of pregnancy, oocyte, embryo formation, Anti-Mullerian Hormone and antral follicle count. Live birth rates were not calculated. There was no statistical difference between POR/POI and those with < 35 years or > 35 years. Further randomized studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢内注射富血小板血浆对卵巢反应不良(POR)或卵巢早衰(POI)患者的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析
POR或POI对采用不同卵巢刺激策略的生育治疗构成了巨大挑战。卵巢内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)被认为可改善 POI 或 POR 的卵巢储备和妊娠。然而,其对妊娠、胚胎学和卵巢储备结果的有效性还有待证实。因此,我们根据 PRISMA 指南,系统地检索了对患有 POI 和 POR 的亚健康女性进行卵巢内自体 PRP 注射的效果进行报道的数据库。荟萃分析采用随机模型对 POI 和 POR 注射前后两组的下列结果效应进行了分析:(a)妊娠率、卵母细胞和胚胎形成率(b)卵巢储备指标(前卵泡计数、抗穆勒氏管激素、卵泡刺激素)。对 POI 组和 POR 组以及 35 岁年龄组的妊娠、AFC 和 AMH 进行了单独分析。共纳入了 12 项研究。估计的总效应对数比(log OR = 2.03; 95% CI = 0.13 to 3.92; P = 0.04; I2 = 0.42)倾向于后PRP,证据等级为中等。POI/POR与35岁以上者无明显差异。在胚胎形成率(1.39;95% CI = 0.56 至 2.21;P = 0.02;I2 = 46%)、卵母细胞(0.84;95% CI = -1.3 至 3.0;P = 0.24; I 2 93%)、前卵泡计数(1.78; 95% CI = 0.73 to 2.84; P = 0.01. I2 = 97%)证据水平较低,抗苗勒氏管激素(1.11; 95% CI = 0.16 to 2.05; P = 0.03; I2 = 96%)证据水平较低。我们的研究表明,卵巢内注射 PRP 与妊娠率、妊娠率、卵母细胞率、胚胎形成率、抗穆勒氏激素和前卵泡数无显著相关性。活产率没有计算在内。POR/POI与 35 岁者之间没有统计学差异。需要进一步的随机研究来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effectiveness and adverse effects of oral versus transdermal estradiol for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial The effect of vitamin D on the hormonal profile of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Semen in the time of COVID-19: a narrative review of current evidence and implications for fertility and reproductive health From uncertain to certain—how to proceed with variants of uncertain significance The efficacy of luteal phase support in women with polycystic ovary syndrome following assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1