Making the most of AI and machine learning in organizations and strategy research: Supervised machine learning, causal inference, and matching models

IF 6.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Strategic Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1002/smj.3604
Jason M. Rathje, R. Katila, Philipp Reineke
{"title":"Making the most of AI and machine learning in organizations and strategy research: Supervised machine learning, causal inference, and matching models","authors":"Jason M. Rathje, R. Katila, Philipp Reineke","doi":"10.1002/smj.3604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We spotlight the use of machine learning in two‐stage matching models to deal with sample selection bias. Recent advances in machine learning have unlocked new empirical possibilities for inductive theorizing. In contrast, the opportunities to use machine learning in regression studies involving large‐scale data with many covariates and a causal claim are still less well understood. Our core contribution is to guide researchers in the use of machine learning approaches to choosing matching variables for enhanced causal inference in propensity score matching models. We use an analysis of real‐world technology invention data of public–private relationships to demonstrate the method and find that machine learning can provide an alternative approach to ad hoc matching. However, as with any method, it is also important to understand its limitations.This article explores the use of machine learning to enhance decision‐making, particularly in addressing sample selection bias in large‐scale datasets. The rapid development of AI and machine learning offers new, powerful tools especially for digital ecosystems where complex data and causal relationships are complex to analyze. We offer managers and stakeholders insight into the effective integration of machine learning for selecting critical variables in propensity score matching models. Through a detailed examination of real‐world data on technology inventions within public–private relationships, we demonstrate the effectiveness of machine learning as a robust alternative to traditional matching methods.","PeriodicalId":22023,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We spotlight the use of machine learning in two‐stage matching models to deal with sample selection bias. Recent advances in machine learning have unlocked new empirical possibilities for inductive theorizing. In contrast, the opportunities to use machine learning in regression studies involving large‐scale data with many covariates and a causal claim are still less well understood. Our core contribution is to guide researchers in the use of machine learning approaches to choosing matching variables for enhanced causal inference in propensity score matching models. We use an analysis of real‐world technology invention data of public–private relationships to demonstrate the method and find that machine learning can provide an alternative approach to ad hoc matching. However, as with any method, it is also important to understand its limitations.This article explores the use of machine learning to enhance decision‐making, particularly in addressing sample selection bias in large‐scale datasets. The rapid development of AI and machine learning offers new, powerful tools especially for digital ecosystems where complex data and causal relationships are complex to analyze. We offer managers and stakeholders insight into the effective integration of machine learning for selecting critical variables in propensity score matching models. Through a detailed examination of real‐world data on technology inventions within public–private relationships, we demonstrate the effectiveness of machine learning as a robust alternative to traditional matching methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在组织和战略研究中充分利用人工智能和机器学习:监督机器学习、因果推理和匹配模型
我们重点介绍了机器学习在两阶段匹配模型中的应用,以解决样本选择偏差问题。机器学习的最新进展为归纳理论化提供了新的经验可能性。相比之下,在涉及具有许多协变量和因果主张的大规模数据的回归研究中使用机器学习的机会还不太为人所知。我们的核心贡献是指导研究人员使用机器学习方法选择匹配变量,以增强倾向得分匹配模型中的因果推断。我们利用对真实世界中公私关系技术发明数据的分析来演示该方法,并发现机器学习可以提供一种替代临时匹配的方法。然而,与任何方法一样,了解其局限性也很重要。本文探讨了如何利用机器学习提高决策水平,尤其是解决大规模数据集中的样本选择偏差问题。人工智能和机器学习的快速发展为数字生态系统提供了新的强大工具,尤其是在复杂数据和因果关系难以分析的情况下。我们为管理者和利益相关者提供了有效整合机器学习的见解,以便在倾向得分匹配模型中选择关键变量。通过对公私关系中技术发明的真实数据进行详细研究,我们证明了机器学习作为传统匹配方法的有力替代品的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.40%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: At the Strategic Management Journal, we are committed to publishing top-tier research that addresses key questions in the field of strategic management and captivates scholars in this area. Our publication welcomes manuscripts covering a wide range of topics, perspectives, and research methodologies. As a result, our editorial decisions truly embrace the diversity inherent in the field.
期刊最新文献
What makes activities strategic: Toward a new framework for strategy-as-practice research Gender and racial minorities on corporate boards: How board faultlines and CEO‐minority director overlap affect firm performance Do makerspaces affect entrepreneurship? If so, who, how, and when? Balancing allocative and dynamic efficiency with redundant R&D allocation: The role of organizational proximity and centralization Identifying microfoundations of dynamic managerial capabilities for business model innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1