Influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp utilization on deep bite correction and root length in adults

Fatemah Husain, S. Warunek, Ashish Gurav, Terry Giangreco, William Tanberg, T. Al-Jewair
{"title":"Influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp utilization on deep bite correction and root length in adults","authors":"Fatemah Husain, S. Warunek, Ashish Gurav, Terry Giangreco, William Tanberg, T. Al-Jewair","doi":"10.2319/012724-70.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To assess the influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp use on skeletal deep overbite correction and root length and volume of maxillary anterior teeth.\n \n \n \n This was a retrospective study of 60 adults with skeletal deep overbite. Patients were divided into three groups: Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with precision bite ramps (Invisalign with Bite Ramps [IBR] = 12), Invisalign with no bite ramps (INBR = 22), and full-fixed appliances (FFA = 26). Cone beam computed tomography records at T1 (pretreatment) and T2 (posttreatment) were used to measure eight skeletal, nine dental, and three soft-tissue cephalometric variables. Maxillary anterior teeth root length (mm), root volume (mm3), and percent root volume loss between T1 and T2 (%) were also recorded.\n \n \n \n Significant changes from T1 to T2 among the three groups were seen in ANB(o), lower face height (%), ODI (overbite depth indicator) (o), and U1–SN (o). Reduction in root length was significantly less (P < .001) in the INBR and IBR groups compared to the FFA group. Reduction in root volume and percent volume loss were significantly higher in the INBR group compared to the IBR group (P < .001), but the difference between the two Invisalign groups and the FFA group was not significant.\n \n \n \n Skeletal deep overbite correction using Invisalign with or without bite ramps is comparable to FFA. Reduction in root length was significantly less with Invisalign compared to FFA. Bite ramps influenced root volume and volume loss but not root length.\n","PeriodicalId":503286,"journal":{"name":"The Angle Orthodontist","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/012724-70.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp use on skeletal deep overbite correction and root length and volume of maxillary anterior teeth. This was a retrospective study of 60 adults with skeletal deep overbite. Patients were divided into three groups: Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with precision bite ramps (Invisalign with Bite Ramps [IBR] = 12), Invisalign with no bite ramps (INBR = 22), and full-fixed appliances (FFA = 26). Cone beam computed tomography records at T1 (pretreatment) and T2 (posttreatment) were used to measure eight skeletal, nine dental, and three soft-tissue cephalometric variables. Maxillary anterior teeth root length (mm), root volume (mm3), and percent root volume loss between T1 and T2 (%) were also recorded. Significant changes from T1 to T2 among the three groups were seen in ANB(o), lower face height (%), ODI (overbite depth indicator) (o), and U1–SN (o). Reduction in root length was significantly less (P < .001) in the INBR and IBR groups compared to the FFA group. Reduction in root volume and percent volume loss were significantly higher in the INBR group compared to the IBR group (P < .001), but the difference between the two Invisalign groups and the FFA group was not significant. Skeletal deep overbite correction using Invisalign with or without bite ramps is comparable to FFA. Reduction in root length was significantly less with Invisalign compared to FFA. Bite ramps influenced root volume and volume loss but not root length.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐适美精密咬合斜坡的使用对成人深咬合矫正和牙根长度的影响
评估使用隐适美精密咬合坡度矫正器对骨骼深覆颌矫正以及上颌前牙牙根长度和体积的影响。 这是一项回顾性研究,对象是 60 名骨骼深咬合的成年人。患者被分为三组:隐适美(Align Technology,加利福尼亚州圣何塞)带精密咬合斜坡(Invisalign with Bite Ramps [IBR] = 12)、无咬合斜坡隐适美(INBR = 22)和全固定矫治器(FFA = 26)。在 T1(治疗前)和 T2(治疗后)的锥形束计算机断层扫描记录用于测量 8 个骨骼变量、9 个牙齿变量和 3 个软组织头颅测量变量。此外,还记录了上颌前牙牙根长度(毫米)、牙根体积(立方毫米)以及 T1 和 T2 之间牙根体积损失的百分比(%)。 从 T1 到 T2,三组患者的 ANB(o)、面下高度(%)、ODI(咬合过深指标)(o)和 U1-SN (o)均有显著变化。与 FFA 组相比,INBR 组和 IBR 组的牙根长度减少明显较少(P < .001)。与 IBR 组相比,INBR 组的牙根体积减少量和体积损失百分比明显较高(P < .001),但两个隐适美组和 FFA 组之间的差异不明显。 使用含或不含咬合斜坡的隐适美矫正器进行骨骼深覆咬矫正的效果与 FFA 相当。隐适美与FFA相比,牙根长度的减少明显较少。咬合斜面影响牙根体积和体积损失,但不影响牙根长度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhanced pendulum appliance utilizing temporary anchorage device-based Nance arch and modified springs for optimized molar distalization control: a case report Orthodontic treatment of a middle-aged patient with periodontally compromised dentition accompanied by pathologic tooth migration Evaluation of anchorage loss after en masse retraction in orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: randomized clinical trial Vertical and transverse treatment effects of Invisalign First system compared to Hyrax maxillary expanders with fixed appliances in mixed dentition patients Accuracy of soy-based resins for dental 3D printing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1