What are the characteristics and results of Tilt Tests in the elderly?

Ana Gabriela Ponte Farias, Arnóbio Dias da Ponte Filho, Marcela Albuquerque de Holanda, Arthur Holanda Dantas, Aston Alves de Freitas, Rodrigo Carvalho Paiva, Marcela Sobreira Kubrusly, Davi Sales Pereira Gondim, Pedro Barbosa Duarte Vidal, Fernanda Pimentel Arraes Maia, Luís Gustavo Bastos Pinho, Ana Gabriela Ponte Farias, Eduardo Arrais Rocha
{"title":"What are the characteristics and results of Tilt Tests in the elderly?","authors":"Ana Gabriela Ponte Farias, Arnóbio Dias da Ponte Filho, Marcela Albuquerque de Holanda, Arthur Holanda Dantas, Aston Alves de Freitas, Rodrigo Carvalho Paiva, Marcela Sobreira Kubrusly, Davi Sales Pereira Gondim, Pedro Barbosa Duarte Vidal, Fernanda Pimentel Arraes Maia, Luís Gustavo Bastos Pinho, Ana Gabriela Ponte Farias, Eduardo Arrais Rocha","doi":"10.24207/jca.v38i.3491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The elderly have several causes of syncope or pre-syncope. The importance of the Tilt Test (TT) has been questioned in this population. However, dysautonomic causes are common in these age groups, having an impact on morbidity and mortality. Objective: Compare the results of the TT between the age groups of the elderly (>=60 years) and the non-elderly. Methods: Crosssectional study carried out between 2016-2021. We used the Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests, with a p-value < 5% considered significant. The protocols used were Westminster or Italian. Results: We analyzed 2364 tilt tests, 61.7% female, aged 51.1 (31-71) years. Positivity was 32.6%, 37.2% with sensitization (p < 0.0001). In the elderly group (EG), there were 958 tests (40.5%) and 1381 (58.4%) in the non-elderly (NEG). EG positivity was 270 (28.0%), lower than NEG with 524 (37.43%) (p <  0.01). Positivity with sensitization in EG was 195 (20.35%) x 403(29.18%) in NEG (p<0.001). In EG, 50 patients (5.22%) had a dysautonomic response and in NEG, there were 10 (0.72%) (p < 0.001). Complications were 4.2% EG x 2.6% NEG ( p= 0.03). Conclusion: The TT in the elderly showed a lower incidence of positivity in the passive and sensitization phases compared to the non-elderly. Vasovagal causes were the most frequent causes in the elderly, had a higher incidence of dysautonomic responses, fewer prodromes and a higher rate of complications, however without severity.","PeriodicalId":33934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24207/jca.v38i.3491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The elderly have several causes of syncope or pre-syncope. The importance of the Tilt Test (TT) has been questioned in this population. However, dysautonomic causes are common in these age groups, having an impact on morbidity and mortality. Objective: Compare the results of the TT between the age groups of the elderly (>=60 years) and the non-elderly. Methods: Crosssectional study carried out between 2016-2021. We used the Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests, with a p-value < 5% considered significant. The protocols used were Westminster or Italian. Results: We analyzed 2364 tilt tests, 61.7% female, aged 51.1 (31-71) years. Positivity was 32.6%, 37.2% with sensitization (p < 0.0001). In the elderly group (EG), there were 958 tests (40.5%) and 1381 (58.4%) in the non-elderly (NEG). EG positivity was 270 (28.0%), lower than NEG with 524 (37.43%) (p <  0.01). Positivity with sensitization in EG was 195 (20.35%) x 403(29.18%) in NEG (p<0.001). In EG, 50 patients (5.22%) had a dysautonomic response and in NEG, there were 10 (0.72%) (p < 0.001). Complications were 4.2% EG x 2.6% NEG ( p= 0.03). Conclusion: The TT in the elderly showed a lower incidence of positivity in the passive and sensitization phases compared to the non-elderly. Vasovagal causes were the most frequent causes in the elderly, had a higher incidence of dysautonomic responses, fewer prodromes and a higher rate of complications, however without severity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人倾斜试验的特点和结果是什么?
导言老年人晕厥或晕厥前有多种原因。倾斜试验(TT)在这类人群中的重要性一直受到质疑。然而,在这些年龄组中,自主神经功能紊乱是常见的原因,对发病率和死亡率都有影响。目的:比较倾斜试验和倾斜试验的结果:比较老年人(>=60 岁)和非老年人两个年龄组的倾斜试验结果。研究方法2016-2021年间进行的横断面研究。我们使用了曼-惠特尼和卡方检验,P值小于5%视为显著。使用的协议为威斯敏斯特语或意大利语。结果:我们分析了 2364 次倾斜试验,其中 61.7% 为女性,年龄为 51.1(31-71)岁。阳性率为 32.6%,37.2% 为过敏反应(P < 0.0001)。老年人组(EG)共进行了 958 次测试(40.5%),非老年人组(NEG)共进行了 1381 次测试(58.4%)。EG 阳性率为 270(28.0%),低于 NEG 的 524(37.43%)(p < 0.01)。EG 的致敏阳性率为 195(20.35%)x NEG 的 403(29.18%)(p<0.001)。在 EG 中,有 50 名患者(5.22%)出现自主神经反应失调,而在 NEG 中,有 10 名患者(0.72%)出现自主神经反应失调(P<0.001)。并发症方面,EG 为 4.2%,NEG 为 2.6%(P= 0.03)。结论与非老年人相比,老年人在被动和致敏阶段的 TT 阳性率较低。血管迷走神经病因是老年人最常见的病因,其自律神经失调反应发生率较高,前驱症状较少,并发症发生率较高,但并不严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Kartagener’s Syndrome Evolution of Cardiac Arrythmia Management by Catheter Ablation in Tanzania What are the characteristics and results of Tilt Tests in the elderly? The Tilt Test in the Assessment of Syncope and Pre-syncope. Effective and safe? Analysis of a Series of 2364 Patients over 6 Years Lead Dislodgement Post Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment after Atrioventricular Node Ablation and Biventricular Pacemaker
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1