Validación Rasch del Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire en población española con queratocono

{"title":"Validación Rasch del Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire en población española con queratocono","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.oftal.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To carry out a methodologically complete validation of the Spanish version of the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ) in a Spanish population with keratoconus.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Analytical, prospective study, including patients with keratoconus without previous surgical history, in which a measurement of quality of life was performed using the KEPAQ questionnaire, a complete exploration of the anterior pole and a corneal elevation topography with the Galilei™ G6 topographer. The evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the scale in the studied population was carried out using Rasch modeling.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 140 patients with keratoconus were included, with a median age of 26.0 years, the majority (57.6%) being men. For the KEPAQ-E subscale, the median score was 69.3, with a reliability of 0.85 and an eigenvalue of the first contrast of 2.34. For the KEPAQ-F, the median score was 56.4, with a reliability of 0.88 and an eigenvalue of 2.00. All infit and outfit parameters were within normal limits for both subscales. A significant evaluation was found between the evaluations of both subscales (rho<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.696; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). The evaluations of the subscales and various clinical and tomographic characteristics showed a significant classification between them (<em>p</em> value between 0.048 y 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The KEPAQ is a psychometrically robust and valid scale to evaluate quality of life in the Spanish population with keratoconus. This questionnaire can be easily used for both clinical and research aims.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8348,"journal":{"name":"Archivos De La Sociedad Espanola De Oftalmologia","volume":"99 8","pages":"Pages 323-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos De La Sociedad Espanola De Oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0365669124000765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To carry out a methodologically complete validation of the Spanish version of the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ) in a Spanish population with keratoconus.

Method

Analytical, prospective study, including patients with keratoconus without previous surgical history, in which a measurement of quality of life was performed using the KEPAQ questionnaire, a complete exploration of the anterior pole and a corneal elevation topography with the Galilei™ G6 topographer. The evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the scale in the studied population was carried out using Rasch modeling.

Results

A total of 140 patients with keratoconus were included, with a median age of 26.0 years, the majority (57.6%) being men. For the KEPAQ-E subscale, the median score was 69.3, with a reliability of 0.85 and an eigenvalue of the first contrast of 2.34. For the KEPAQ-F, the median score was 56.4, with a reliability of 0.88 and an eigenvalue of 2.00. All infit and outfit parameters were within normal limits for both subscales. A significant evaluation was found between the evaluations of both subscales (rho = 0.696; p < 0.001). The evaluations of the subscales and various clinical and tomographic characteristics showed a significant classification between them (p value between 0.048 y 0.001).

Conclusion

The KEPAQ is a psychometrically robust and valid scale to evaluate quality of life in the Spanish population with keratoconus. This questionnaire can be easily used for both clinical and research aims.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在西班牙角膜炎患者中对角膜炎终点评估问卷进行 Rasch 验证。
方法分析性前瞻性研究,纳入无手术史的角膜炎患者,使用 KEPAQ 问卷、前极点全面检查和 Galilei™ G6 角膜地形图仪进行角膜抬高地形图检查,测量患者的生活质量。结果共纳入了 140 名角膜炎患者,中位年龄为 26.0 岁,大多数(57.6%)为男性。KEPAQ-E 分量表的中位数为 69.3 分,信度为 0.85,第一次对比的特征值为 2.34。KEPAQ-F 的中位数为 56.4 分,信度为 0.88,特征值为 2.00。两个分量表中的所有信息和装备参数都在正常范围内。两个分量表的评价之间存在明显差异(rho = 0.696; p < 0.001)。各分量表的评估结果与各种临床特征和断层扫描特征之间存在显著的分级关系(p 值介于 0.048 和 0.001 之间)。该问卷可轻松用于临床和研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: La revista Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, editada mensualmente por la propia Sociedad, tiene como objetivo publicar trabajos de investigación básica y clínica como artículos originales; casos clínicos, innovaciones técnicas y correlaciones clinicopatológicas en forma de comunicaciones cortas; editoriales; revisiones; cartas al editor; comentarios de libros; información de eventos; noticias personales y anuncios comerciales, así como trabajos de temas históricos y motivos inconográficos relacionados con la Oftalmología. El título abreviado es Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol, y debe ser utilizado en bibliografías, notas a pie de página y referencias bibliográficas.
期刊最新文献
Síndrome de isquemia ocular tras tratamiento estético con ácido hialurónico Metotrexato intralesional y nuevos abordajes para la neoadyuvancia en el carcinoma escamoso cutaneo periocular Resultados a largo plazo del tratamiento de los pacientes con degeneración macular asociada a la edad exudativa durante la pandemia por COVID-19 Melanoma de cuerpo ciliar: imagen multimodal Dehiscencia de suturas en pacientes con enfermedad del tejido conectivo: síndromes de Marfan y Weill-Marchesani
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1