Towards implementation of cognitive bias modification in mental health care: State of the science, best practices, and ways forward

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behaviour Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104557
Janna N. Vrijsen , Ben Grafton , Ernst H.W. Koster , Jennifer Lau , Charlotte E. Wittekind , Yair Bar-Haim , Eni S. Becker , Melissa A. Brotman , Jutta Joormann , Amit Lazarov , Colin MacLeod , Victoria Manning , Jeremy W. Pettit , Mike Rinck , Elske Salemink , Marcella L. Woud , Lauren S. Hallion , Reinout W. Wiers
{"title":"Towards implementation of cognitive bias modification in mental health care: State of the science, best practices, and ways forward","authors":"Janna N. Vrijsen ,&nbsp;Ben Grafton ,&nbsp;Ernst H.W. Koster ,&nbsp;Jennifer Lau ,&nbsp;Charlotte E. Wittekind ,&nbsp;Yair Bar-Haim ,&nbsp;Eni S. Becker ,&nbsp;Melissa A. Brotman ,&nbsp;Jutta Joormann ,&nbsp;Amit Lazarov ,&nbsp;Colin MacLeod ,&nbsp;Victoria Manning ,&nbsp;Jeremy W. Pettit ,&nbsp;Mike Rinck ,&nbsp;Elske Salemink ,&nbsp;Marcella L. Woud ,&nbsp;Lauren S. Hallion ,&nbsp;Reinout W. Wiers","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive bias modification (CBM) has evolved from an experimental method testing cognitive mechanisms of psychopathology to a promising tool for accessible digital mental health care. While we are still discovering the conditions under which clinically relevant effects occur, the dire need for accessible, effective, and low-cost mental health tools underscores the need for implementation where such tools are available. Providing our expert opinion as Association for Cognitive Bias Modification members, we first discuss the readiness of different CBM approaches for clinical implementation, then discuss key considerations with regard to implementation. Evidence is robust for approach bias modification as an adjunctive intervention for alcohol use disorders and interpretation bias modification as a stand-alone intervention for anxiety disorders. Theoretical predictions regarding the mechanisms by which bias and symptom change occur await further testing. We propose that CBM interventions with demonstrated efficacy should be provided to the targeted populations. To facilitate this, we set a research agenda based on implementation frameworks, which includes feasibility and acceptability testing, co-creation with end-users, and collaboration with industry partners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 104557"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000846/pdfft?md5=1823bfa87e0340b4ae93c1aa73a6249f&pid=1-s2.0-S0005796724000846-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive bias modification (CBM) has evolved from an experimental method testing cognitive mechanisms of psychopathology to a promising tool for accessible digital mental health care. While we are still discovering the conditions under which clinically relevant effects occur, the dire need for accessible, effective, and low-cost mental health tools underscores the need for implementation where such tools are available. Providing our expert opinion as Association for Cognitive Bias Modification members, we first discuss the readiness of different CBM approaches for clinical implementation, then discuss key considerations with regard to implementation. Evidence is robust for approach bias modification as an adjunctive intervention for alcohol use disorders and interpretation bias modification as a stand-alone intervention for anxiety disorders. Theoretical predictions regarding the mechanisms by which bias and symptom change occur await further testing. We propose that CBM interventions with demonstrated efficacy should be provided to the targeted populations. To facilitate this, we set a research agenda based on implementation frameworks, which includes feasibility and acceptability testing, co-creation with end-users, and collaboration with industry partners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在心理健康护理中实施认知偏差矫正:科学现状、最佳实践和前进方向
认知偏差修正法(CBM)已经从一种测试心理病理学认知机制的实验方法发展成为一种很有前景的数字心理保健工具。虽然我们仍在探索产生临床相关效果的条件,但对可获取、有效且低成本的心理健康工具的迫切需求强调了在有此类工具的情况下实施的必要性。作为认知偏差修正协会的成员,我们将提供专家意见,首先讨论不同 CBM 方法在临床实施方面的准备情况,然后讨论实施方面的主要注意事项。将方法偏差修正作为酒精使用障碍的辅助干预措施,以及将解释偏差修正作为焦虑症的独立干预措施,都有可靠的证据。关于偏差和症状变化发生机制的理论预测有待进一步检验。我们建议,应向目标人群提供已证明有效的 CBM 干预措施。为此,我们制定了基于实施框架的研究议程,其中包括可行性和可接受性测试、与最终用户的共同创造以及与行业合作伙伴的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
期刊最新文献
Sleep bad, feel bad: Unpacking the role of exercise and socializing Intolerance of uncertainty enhances adolescent fear generalization in both perceptual-based and category-based tasks: fNIRS studies Positive cognitive reappraisal flexibility is associated with lower levels of perceived stress The future of the eating disorder field: Inclusive, aware of systems, and personalized Active contextualization reduces traumatic memory intrusions via memory integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1