Effects of bladder neck sparing on continence outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and metaanalysis

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Prostate International Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.004
Joongwon Choi, Yun-Jung Yang, Chung Un Lee, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin Wook Kim, Jong Hyun Tae, Se Young Choi, In Ho Chang, Eun-Jung Yang, Yong Seong Lee
{"title":"Effects of bladder neck sparing on continence outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and metaanalysis","authors":"Joongwon Choi, Yun-Jung Yang, Chung Un Lee, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin Wook Kim, Jong Hyun Tae, Se Young Choi, In Ho Chang, Eun-Jung Yang, Yong Seong Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restoration of postoperative urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is affected by diverse factors. We compared the pad-free and positive margin rates of patients who underwent RARP with or without bladder neck sparing (BNS) for prostate cancer. During this systematic review and metaanalysis, we performed an electronic search of the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed to find original articles comparing RARP with and without BNS for prostate cancer. We identified six studies (2,351 patients in total) who underwent RARP with or without BNS. A metaanalysis of the pad-free rate at 3 months was performed. The overall pad-free rate at 3 months for patients who underwent RARP with BNS was significantly higher than that of patients who underwent RARP alone (control group) (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–2.82), with high heterogeneity ( = 0.005; I = 67.45%). The pad-free rates at 7 days, 6 months, and 1 year and positive surgical margin rates of patients who underwent BNS were not significantly different than those in the control group. Although no statistical difference was observed, the catheterization period of the BNS group was shorter than that of the control group (standardized mean difference = −0.08; 95% CI, −0.16 to 0.01). Although RARP with BNS did not affect the long-term outcome of continence, it had a significant effect on the early recovery of continence.","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restoration of postoperative urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is affected by diverse factors. We compared the pad-free and positive margin rates of patients who underwent RARP with or without bladder neck sparing (BNS) for prostate cancer. During this systematic review and metaanalysis, we performed an electronic search of the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed to find original articles comparing RARP with and without BNS for prostate cancer. We identified six studies (2,351 patients in total) who underwent RARP with or without BNS. A metaanalysis of the pad-free rate at 3 months was performed. The overall pad-free rate at 3 months for patients who underwent RARP with BNS was significantly higher than that of patients who underwent RARP alone (control group) (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–2.82), with high heterogeneity ( = 0.005; I = 67.45%). The pad-free rates at 7 days, 6 months, and 1 year and positive surgical margin rates of patients who underwent BNS were not significantly different than those in the control group. Although no statistical difference was observed, the catheterization period of the BNS group was shorter than that of the control group (standardized mean difference = −0.08; 95% CI, −0.16 to 0.01). Although RARP with BNS did not affect the long-term outcome of continence, it had a significant effect on the early recovery of continence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保留膀胱颈对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术尿失禁疗效的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析
机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)术后恢复排尿受多种因素影响。我们比较了接受或未接受膀胱颈疏通术(BNS)的前列腺癌根治术患者的无尿垫率和阳性边缘率。在这项系统回顾和荟萃分析中,我们对 Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 PubMed 进行了电子检索,以找到比较前列腺癌 RARP 有无 BNS 的原始文章。我们找到了六项研究(共 2351 名患者),这些患者接受了有无 BNS 的 RARP 治疗。我们对 3 个月的无衬垫率进行了荟萃分析。接受 RARP 和 BNS 治疗的患者 3 个月后的总无垫率明显高于单纯接受 RARP 治疗的患者(对照组)(几率比 1.86;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.22-2.82),异质性较高(= 0.005;I = 67.45%)。接受 BNS 治疗的患者在 7 天、6 个月和 1 年后的无衬垫率以及手术切缘阳性率与对照组相比没有显著差异。虽然没有观察到统计学差异,但 BNS 组的导管插入时间比对照组短(标准化平均差异 = -0.08;95% CI,-0.16 至 0.01)。虽然使用 BNS 的 RARP 并不影响排尿的长期效果,但对排尿的早期恢复有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Screening and validation of novel serum panel of microRNA in stratification of prostate cancer” [Prostate Int 11 (2023) 150–158] Current status and therapeutic value of extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Negative magnetic resonance imaging cannot be used to omit an initial prostate biopsy - An ambispective study Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging The association between inflammatory bowel disease and risk of prostate cancer: a population-based retrospective study based on Korean National Health Insurance Service database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1