Comparison of efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus docetaxil, cisplatin, plus fluorouracil in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-01
Abdul Rehman, Ghulam Haider, Akash Ramchand, - Anaum, Shumaila Nawaz Khan, Faiza Mahar, Raheela Mahmood, Sana Saher, Yasir Rehman Khattak, Muhammad Arsalan Aqeel
{"title":"Comparison of efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus docetaxil, cisplatin, plus fluorouracil in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.","authors":"Abdul Rehman, Ghulam Haider, Akash Ramchand, - Anaum, Shumaila Nawaz Khan, Faiza Mahar, Raheela Mahmood, Sana Saher, Yasir Rehman Khattak, Muhammad Arsalan Aqeel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Induction followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is the standard of care for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). This study evaluated and compared the efficacy of two regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy along with CCRT in LANPC. Patients with LANPC were randomly divided in Group I (receiving neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin) and Group II (receiving neoadjuvant docetaxil, cisplatin and fluorouracil). Both groups also received concurrent single agent (i.e., cisplatin) chemotherapy and radiotherapy (70Gy). Treatment response was assessed at 8 weeks after the completion of CCRT using RECIST criteria. A total of 68 LANPC patients were enrolled. Group I comprised of 32 patients, with male to female ratio of 2.2, a mean (range, median) age of 38.6±11.3 (19-58, 36) years. Group II comprised of 36 patients, with male to female ratio of 3.5, mean (range, median) age of 40.9 ±11.6 (17-63, 40) years. The complete response was higher whereas the partial response was lower in Group I as compared to Group II (23/32 versus 16/36 and 06/32 versus 18/36, respectively). LANPC patients receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed higher response, as compared with docetaxil, cisplatin and fluorouracil based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19971,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"37 2","pages":"377-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Induction followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is the standard of care for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). This study evaluated and compared the efficacy of two regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy along with CCRT in LANPC. Patients with LANPC were randomly divided in Group I (receiving neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin) and Group II (receiving neoadjuvant docetaxil, cisplatin and fluorouracil). Both groups also received concurrent single agent (i.e., cisplatin) chemotherapy and radiotherapy (70Gy). Treatment response was assessed at 8 weeks after the completion of CCRT using RECIST criteria. A total of 68 LANPC patients were enrolled. Group I comprised of 32 patients, with male to female ratio of 2.2, a mean (range, median) age of 38.6±11.3 (19-58, 36) years. Group II comprised of 36 patients, with male to female ratio of 3.5, mean (range, median) age of 40.9 ±11.6 (17-63, 40) years. The complete response was higher whereas the partial response was lower in Group I as compared to Group II (23/32 versus 16/36 and 06/32 versus 18/36, respectively). LANPC patients receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed higher response, as compared with docetaxil, cisplatin and fluorouracil based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吉西他滨加顺铂与多西他赛、顺铂加氟尿嘧啶新辅助化疗对局部晚期鼻咽癌疗效的比较。
局部晚期鼻咽癌(LANPC)的标准治疗方法是诱导后同时进行化放疗(CCRT)。本研究评估并比较了两种新辅助化疗方案和 CCRT 对局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效。LANPC患者被随机分为I组(接受吉西他滨和顺铂新辅助化疗)和II组(接受多西他赛、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶新辅助化疗)。两组患者还同时接受单药(即顺铂)化疗和放疗(70Gy)。治疗反应在完成 CCRT 8 周后根据 RECIST 标准进行评估。共有 68 名 LANPC 患者入组。I 组有 32 名患者,男女比例为 2.2,平均年龄(范围,中位数)为 38.6±11.3(19-58,36)岁。第二组有 36 名患者,男女比例为 3.5,平均年龄(范围,中位数)为 40.9±11.6(17-63,40)岁。与 II 组相比,I 组的完全应答率较高,而部分应答率较低(分别为 23/32 对 16/36 和 06/32 对 18/36)。与多西他赛、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶为基础的新辅助化疗相比,接受吉西他滨加顺铂新辅助化疗的 LANPC 患者的应答率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (PJPS) is a peer reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical sciences journal. The PJPS had its origin in 1988 from the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Karachi as a biannual journal, frequency converted as quarterly in 2005, and now PJPS is being published as bi-monthly from January 2013. PJPS covers Biological, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Research (Drug Delivery, Pharmacy Management, Molecular Biology, Biochemical, Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Phytochemical, Bio-analytical, Therapeutics, Biotechnology and research on nano particles.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic value of T-lymphocyte subsets, lymphocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio, interleukin 6, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in patients with septic shock and effects of vitamin C on patients with septic shock. Research on neuroimmune regulatory mechanisms and intervention strategies for chronic insomnia based on network pharmacology. Schiff-based metal complexes of atenolol: Synthesis, characterization, molecular docking and biological evaluation. Schisantherin B exerts therapeutic effects on spinal cord injury via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. The relationship between blood uric acid, serum lipoprotein(a) and the severity of neurological damage in patients with acute arteriolar occlusive cerebral infarction combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the therapeutic effect of ligustrazine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1