Drug-Coated Balloons in the Management of Coronary Artery Disease.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013302
Serge Korjian, Killian J McCarthy, Emily A Larnard, Donald E Cutlip, Margaret B McEntegart, Ajay J Kirtane, Robert W Yeh
{"title":"Drug-Coated Balloons in the Management of Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Serge Korjian, Killian J McCarthy, Emily A Larnard, Donald E Cutlip, Margaret B McEntegart, Ajay J Kirtane, Robert W Yeh","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are specialized coronary devices comprised of a semicompliant balloon catheter with an engineered coating that allows the delivery of antiproliferative agents locally to the vessel wall during percutaneous coronary intervention. Although DCBs were initially developed more than a decade ago, their potential in coronary interventions has recently sparked renewed interest, especially in the United States. Originally designed to overcome the limitations of conventional balloon angioplasty and stenting, they aim to match or even improve upon the outcomes of drug-eluting stents without leaving a permanent implant. Presently, in-stent restenosis is the condition with the most robust evidence supporting the use of DCBs. DCBs provide improved long-term vessel patency compared with conventional balloon angioplasty and may be comparable to drug-eluting stents without the need for an additional stent layer, supporting their use as a first-line therapy for in-stent restenosis. Beyond the treatment of in-stent restenosis, DCBs provide an additional tool for de novo lesions for a strategy that avoids a permanent metal scaffold, which may be especially useful for the management of technically challenging anatomies such as small vessels and bifurcations. DCBs might also be advantageous for patients with high bleeding risk due to the decreased necessity for extended antiplatelet therapy, and in patients with diabetes and patients with diffuse disease to minimize long-stented segments. Further studies are crucial to confirm these broader applications for DCBs and to further validate safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are specialized coronary devices comprised of a semicompliant balloon catheter with an engineered coating that allows the delivery of antiproliferative agents locally to the vessel wall during percutaneous coronary intervention. Although DCBs were initially developed more than a decade ago, their potential in coronary interventions has recently sparked renewed interest, especially in the United States. Originally designed to overcome the limitations of conventional balloon angioplasty and stenting, they aim to match or even improve upon the outcomes of drug-eluting stents without leaving a permanent implant. Presently, in-stent restenosis is the condition with the most robust evidence supporting the use of DCBs. DCBs provide improved long-term vessel patency compared with conventional balloon angioplasty and may be comparable to drug-eluting stents without the need for an additional stent layer, supporting their use as a first-line therapy for in-stent restenosis. Beyond the treatment of in-stent restenosis, DCBs provide an additional tool for de novo lesions for a strategy that avoids a permanent metal scaffold, which may be especially useful for the management of technically challenging anatomies such as small vessels and bifurcations. DCBs might also be advantageous for patients with high bleeding risk due to the decreased necessity for extended antiplatelet therapy, and in patients with diabetes and patients with diffuse disease to minimize long-stented segments. Further studies are crucial to confirm these broader applications for DCBs and to further validate safety and efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物涂层球囊在冠状动脉疾病治疗中的应用。
药物涂层球囊(DCB)是一种专门的冠状动脉设备,由一个半顺应性球囊导管组成,导管上有一层工程涂层,可在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗过程中向血管壁局部输送抗增生药物。虽然 DCB 最初开发于十多年前,但其在冠状动脉介入治疗中的潜力最近再次引发了人们的兴趣,尤其是在美国。DCB 最初是为了克服传统球囊血管成形术和支架植入术的局限性而设计的,其目的是在不留下永久性植入物的情况下达到甚至改善药物洗脱支架的效果。目前,支架内再狭窄是支持使用 DCB 的最有力证据。与传统的球囊血管成形术相比,DCB 可改善血管的长期通畅性,而且无需额外的支架层就可与药物洗脱支架相媲美,因此支持将其作为治疗支架内再狭窄的一线疗法。除了治疗支架内再狭窄外,DCB 还为治疗新发病变提供了一种避免使用永久金属支架的额外工具,这对于治疗小血管和分叉等技术难度高的解剖结构尤其有用。由于减少了延长抗血小板治疗的必要性,DCB 对于出血风险较高的患者以及糖尿病患者和弥漫性疾病患者也可能具有优势,可以最大限度地减少长支架段。进一步的研究对于确认 DCB 的这些更广泛应用以及进一步验证其安全性和有效性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Coronary Revascularization Decisions: The Promising Role of Large Language Models as a Decision-Support Tool for Multidisciplinary Heart Team. Impact of a Chronic Total Occlusion on Outcomes After FFR-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery: A FAME 3 Substudy. Large Language Models and Revascularization Decisions: The Newest Member of Your Multidisciplinary Heart Team? Relative Benefit of Dual Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Oral Anticoagulation According to Time After ACS and PCI: Insights From the AUGUSTUS Trial. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Annular Reduction by Cinching With TEER in the Commissure (ARCTIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1