Burden of headaches, eye irritation and respiratory symptoms among females stacking LPG with polluting cooking fuels: Modelling from peri-urban Cameroon, Ghana & Kenya

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy nexus Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100304
Kourosh Parvizi , Diana Menya , Emily Nix , Judith Mangeni , Federico Lorenzetti , Edna Sang , Rachel Anderson de Cuevas , Theresa Tawiah , Miranda Baame , Emmanuel Betang , Sara Ronzi , Mieks Twumasi , Seeba Amenga-Etego , Reginald Quansah , Bertrand Hugo Mbatchou Ngahane , Elisa Puzzolo , Kwaku Poku Asante , Daniel Pope , Matthew Shupler
{"title":"Burden of headaches, eye irritation and respiratory symptoms among females stacking LPG with polluting cooking fuels: Modelling from peri-urban Cameroon, Ghana & Kenya","authors":"Kourosh Parvizi ,&nbsp;Diana Menya ,&nbsp;Emily Nix ,&nbsp;Judith Mangeni ,&nbsp;Federico Lorenzetti ,&nbsp;Edna Sang ,&nbsp;Rachel Anderson de Cuevas ,&nbsp;Theresa Tawiah ,&nbsp;Miranda Baame ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Betang ,&nbsp;Sara Ronzi ,&nbsp;Mieks Twumasi ,&nbsp;Seeba Amenga-Etego ,&nbsp;Reginald Quansah ,&nbsp;Bertrand Hugo Mbatchou Ngahane ,&nbsp;Elisa Puzzolo ,&nbsp;Kwaku Poku Asante ,&nbsp;Daniel Pope ,&nbsp;Matthew Shupler","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is a clean cooking fuel that emits less household air pollution (HAP) than polluting cooking fuels (e.g. charcoal, wood). While switching from polluting fuels to LPG can reduce HAP and improve health, the impact of ‘stacking’ (concurrent use of polluting fuels and LPG) on adverse health symptoms (e.g. headaches, eye irritation, cough) among female cooks is uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Survey data from the CLEAN-Air(Africa) study was collected on cooking patterns and health symptoms over the last 12 months (cough, wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath, eye irritation, headaches) from approximately 400 female primary cooks in each of three peri‑urban communities in sub-Saharan Africa: Mbalmayo, Cameroon; Obuasi, Ghana; and Eldoret, Kenya. Random effects Poisson regression, adjusted for socioeconomic and health-related covariates, assessed the relationship between primary and secondary cooking fuel type and self-reported health symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1,147 participants, 10 % (<em>n</em> = 118) exclusively cooked with LPG, 45 % (<em>n</em> = 509) stacked LPG and polluting fuels and 45 % (<em>n</em> = 520) exclusively cooked with polluting fuels. Female cooks stacking LPG and polluting fuels had significantly higher odds of shortness of breath (OR 2.16, 95 %CI:1.04–4.48) compared with those exclusively using LPG. In two communities, headache prevalence was 30 % higher among women stacking LPG with polluting fuels (Mbalmayo:82 %; Eldoret:65 %) compared with those exclusively using LPG (Mbalmayo:53 %; Eldoret:33 %). Women stacking LPG and polluting fuels (OR 2.45, 95 %CI:1.29–4.67) had significantly higher odds of eye irritation than women cooking exclusively with LPG. Second-hand smoke exposure was significantly associated with higher odds of chest tightness (OR 1.92, 95 % CI:1.19–3.11), wheezing (OR 1.76, 95 % CI:1.06–2.91) and cough (OR 1.78, 95 %CI:1.13–2.80).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In peri‑urban sub-Saharan Africa, women exclusively cooking with LPG had lower odds of several health symptoms than those stacking LPG and polluting fuels. Promoting a complete transition to LPG in these communities may likely generate short-term health benefits for primary cooks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100304"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427124000354/pdfft?md5=3f14c523e184b56d325067638874a926&pid=1-s2.0-S2772427124000354-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427124000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is a clean cooking fuel that emits less household air pollution (HAP) than polluting cooking fuels (e.g. charcoal, wood). While switching from polluting fuels to LPG can reduce HAP and improve health, the impact of ‘stacking’ (concurrent use of polluting fuels and LPG) on adverse health symptoms (e.g. headaches, eye irritation, cough) among female cooks is uncertain.

Methods

Survey data from the CLEAN-Air(Africa) study was collected on cooking patterns and health symptoms over the last 12 months (cough, wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath, eye irritation, headaches) from approximately 400 female primary cooks in each of three peri‑urban communities in sub-Saharan Africa: Mbalmayo, Cameroon; Obuasi, Ghana; and Eldoret, Kenya. Random effects Poisson regression, adjusted for socioeconomic and health-related covariates, assessed the relationship between primary and secondary cooking fuel type and self-reported health symptoms.

Results

Among 1,147 participants, 10 % (n = 118) exclusively cooked with LPG, 45 % (n = 509) stacked LPG and polluting fuels and 45 % (n = 520) exclusively cooked with polluting fuels. Female cooks stacking LPG and polluting fuels had significantly higher odds of shortness of breath (OR 2.16, 95 %CI:1.04–4.48) compared with those exclusively using LPG. In two communities, headache prevalence was 30 % higher among women stacking LPG with polluting fuels (Mbalmayo:82 %; Eldoret:65 %) compared with those exclusively using LPG (Mbalmayo:53 %; Eldoret:33 %). Women stacking LPG and polluting fuels (OR 2.45, 95 %CI:1.29–4.67) had significantly higher odds of eye irritation than women cooking exclusively with LPG. Second-hand smoke exposure was significantly associated with higher odds of chest tightness (OR 1.92, 95 % CI:1.19–3.11), wheezing (OR 1.76, 95 % CI:1.06–2.91) and cough (OR 1.78, 95 %CI:1.13–2.80).

Conclusions

In peri‑urban sub-Saharan Africa, women exclusively cooking with LPG had lower odds of several health symptoms than those stacking LPG and polluting fuels. Promoting a complete transition to LPG in these communities may likely generate short-term health benefits for primary cooks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将液化石油气与污染性烹饪燃料混合使用的女性的头痛、眼部刺激和呼吸道症状负担:喀麦隆、加纳和肯尼亚城市周边地区的模型分析
导言液化石油气是一种清洁的烹饪燃料,与木炭、木材等污染性烹饪燃料相比,它排放的家用空气污染(HAP)较少。从污染性燃料改用液化石油气可以减少 HAP 并改善健康,但 "叠加"(同时使用污染性燃料和液化石油气)对女性厨师的不良健康症状(如头痛、眼睛不适、咳嗽)的影响尚不确定。方法从 CLEAN-Air(非洲)研究中收集了过去 12 个月中烹饪模式和健康症状(咳嗽、喘息、胸闷、气短、眼睛不适、头痛)的调查数据,这些数据来自撒哈拉以南非洲三个城郊社区中的大约 400 名初级女厨师:研究对象包括喀麦隆姆巴尔马约、加纳奥布阿西和肯尼亚埃尔多雷特的约 400 名初级女厨师。结果在 1,147 名参与者中,10%(n = 118)完全使用液化石油气做饭,45%(n = 509)将液化石油气和污染燃料叠加,45%(n = 520)完全使用污染燃料做饭。与只使用液化石油气的女厨师相比,使用液化石油气和污染燃料的女厨师出现气短的几率明显更高(OR 2.16,95 %CI:1.04-4.48)。在两个社区,与只使用液化石油气的妇女相比,使用液化石油气和污染燃料的妇女头痛发生率高出 30%(姆巴马约:82%;埃尔多雷特:65%)(姆巴马约:53%;埃尔多雷特:33%)。同时使用液化石油气和污染燃料的妇女(OR 2.45,95 %CI:1.29-4.67)出现眼睛不适的几率明显高于完全使用液化石油气烹饪的妇女。结论在撒哈拉以南非洲城市周边地区,完全使用液化石油气烹饪的妇女比使用液化石油气和污染燃料烹饪的妇女出现多种健康症状的几率要低。在这些社区推动完全过渡到使用液化石油气可能会给主要烹饪者带来短期的健康益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
期刊最新文献
Spatial and temporal grey water footprints of agricultural pesticide use: Improved pesticide use options to decrease water pollution in China Understanding the new quality productive forces in the energy sector The nexus between fossil energy markets and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on clustering structures Price disorder and information content in energy and gold markets: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic Energy security assessment in rural communities in Brazil: A contribution to public policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1