Ophthalmic quality of life in the adult Danish population: an epidemiological study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2023-324414
Toke Bek, Bodil Hammer Bech
{"title":"Ophthalmic quality of life in the adult Danish population: an epidemiological study.","authors":"Toke Bek, Bodil Hammer Bech","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2023-324414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ophthalmic quality of life (OQoL) has been investigated in selected parts of general populations and in patients with ocular disease, but OQoL in unselected general populations has not been studied in detail. The present study reports OQoL obtained from a representative sample of the adult Danish population 2020-2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FORSYN study invited 10 350 citizen representatives for the adult Danish population for a non-mydriatic eye examination and answer the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire with 39 items in the validated Danish translation. The results from the 3384 (32.7%) persons who participated in the study were weighted on the basis of relevant socio-economic factors, and data were projected to represent the total population. Binocular visual acuity was below 0.1 corresponding to legal blindness in 0.22% of this population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OQoL was positively correlated with binocular visual acuity up to better than 93 ETDRS letters, negatively correlated with age for persons younger than 60 years of age and again positively correlated with age for persons older than 60 years. OQoL was negatively correlated with increasing ametropia and refractive error above 1 dioptre and encompassed more OQoL parameters for hyperopic than for myopic persons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underlines the benefits of improving visual acuity even within the normal range and of adjusting uncorrected refraction errors in the general population. OQoL is positively correlated with age in older persons independently of visual acuity, sex, refractive power and previous cataract surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1755-1759"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ophthalmic quality of life (OQoL) has been investigated in selected parts of general populations and in patients with ocular disease, but OQoL in unselected general populations has not been studied in detail. The present study reports OQoL obtained from a representative sample of the adult Danish population 2020-2022.

Methods: The FORSYN study invited 10 350 citizen representatives for the adult Danish population for a non-mydriatic eye examination and answer the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire with 39 items in the validated Danish translation. The results from the 3384 (32.7%) persons who participated in the study were weighted on the basis of relevant socio-economic factors, and data were projected to represent the total population. Binocular visual acuity was below 0.1 corresponding to legal blindness in 0.22% of this population.

Results: OQoL was positively correlated with binocular visual acuity up to better than 93 ETDRS letters, negatively correlated with age for persons younger than 60 years of age and again positively correlated with age for persons older than 60 years. OQoL was negatively correlated with increasing ametropia and refractive error above 1 dioptre and encompassed more OQoL parameters for hyperopic than for myopic persons.

Conclusions: The study underlines the benefits of improving visual acuity even within the normal range and of adjusting uncorrected refraction errors in the general population. OQoL is positively correlated with age in older persons independently of visual acuity, sex, refractive power and previous cataract surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦成年人的眼科生活质量:一项流行病学研究。
背景:眼科生活质量(OQoL)已在部分普通人群和眼科疾病患者中进行了调查,但尚未对未选择的普通人群的 OQoL 进行详细研究。本研究报告了从 2020-2022 年丹麦成年人口的代表性样本中获得的 OQoL:FORSYN研究邀请了10 350名丹麦成年人口的公民代表进行非眼球屈光检查,并回答了国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷的39个项目,该问卷的丹麦语译文已经过验证。根据相关的社会经济因素,对参与研究的 3384 人(32.7%)的结果进行了加权,并将数据推算为代表总人口的数据。研究结果显示,0.22% 的人双眼视力低于 0.1,相当于合法失明:OQoL 与双眼视力呈正相关,最高可达 93 个 ETDRS 字母,与年龄呈负相关(60 岁以下),与年龄呈正相关(60 岁以上)。OQoL 与屈光度和屈光误差的增加呈负相关,远视者的 OQoL 参数多于近视者:这项研究强调了在正常范围内提高视力和调整普通人群未矫正屈光度误差的益处。老年人的 OQoL 与年龄呈正相关,与视力、性别、屈光力和之前的白内障手术无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
Two-year outcome of phacogoniotomy for advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataracts: a multicentre study At a glance Disorganisation of inner retinal layers in diabetic macular oedema: is it time to standardise this OCT biomarker? Retinal detachment incidence in refractive lens exchange versus cataract surgery: uncommon versus rare – systematic review and meta-analysis Cataract surgery in the extremely small eye: morphology, comorbidities and outcomes in 300 eyes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1