Community-Based Pharmacist Anticoagulation Clinic Outcomes Compared with Physician Management.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-03-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v15i1.5929
Iryna Kurochka, Joseph Jadallah, Pramit Nadpara, Jean-Venable Goode
{"title":"Community-Based Pharmacist Anticoagulation Clinic Outcomes Compared with Physician Management.","authors":"Iryna Kurochka, Joseph Jadallah, Pramit Nadpara, Jean-Venable Goode","doi":"10.24926/iip.v15i1.5929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Warfarin has many indications; however, it is the only anticoagulant that is indicated for mechanical mitral value and antiphospholipid syndrome. Management may be conducted by pharmacists in medical clinic settings. <i>Objectives</i>: To evaluate the percentage difference in the international normalized ratio (INR) target range when managed by a community-based pharmacist with a collaborative practice agreement (CPA) versus a physician and to analyze patient satisfaction of an anticoagulation clinic when managed by a community-based pharmacist with a CPA versus a physician. <i>Practice Description</i>: Independent community-based pharmacy. <i>Practice Innovation</i>: Community-based pharmacist managed anticoagulation clinic. Pharmacist provides anticoagulation services under a collaborative practice agreement or conducts INR testing and reporting with physician management of anticoagulation. <i>Methods</i>: Quasi-experiment study design with retrospective and prospective evaluation of warfarin management and patient satisfaction. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients enrolled in the anticoagulation clinic from January 1<sup>st,</sup> 2020 to June 30<sup>th,</sup> 2022. Patients, 18 years or older with an indication for warfarin and attendance of at least 3 anticoagulation appointments were included. The Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) was determined using the traditional method. TTR differences across the two groups were reported using descriptive, bi-variate, and multivariate statistics. All statistical tests were conducted using SAS 9.0. Patient satisfaction was collected for 6 months using a survey created by the investigators. Survey consisted of 18 questions using a 3-point Likert scale. Survey was assessed using descriptive statistics. <i>Results</i>: Thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, 26 were in the pharmacist management group with 609 appointments, and 11 patients were in the physician management group with 123 appointments. There was no statistical significance for the time in the therapeutic range between the pharmacist-managed group (60.7%) and the physician-managed group (59.4%); p-value of <0.829. Results of the satisfaction survey suggest that patients slightly prefer management by a pharmacist over a physician. <i>Conclusion</i>: Community-based pharmacist warfarin management of time in therapeutic range was equivalent to physician management and with similar patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i1.5929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Warfarin has many indications; however, it is the only anticoagulant that is indicated for mechanical mitral value and antiphospholipid syndrome. Management may be conducted by pharmacists in medical clinic settings. Objectives: To evaluate the percentage difference in the international normalized ratio (INR) target range when managed by a community-based pharmacist with a collaborative practice agreement (CPA) versus a physician and to analyze patient satisfaction of an anticoagulation clinic when managed by a community-based pharmacist with a CPA versus a physician. Practice Description: Independent community-based pharmacy. Practice Innovation: Community-based pharmacist managed anticoagulation clinic. Pharmacist provides anticoagulation services under a collaborative practice agreement or conducts INR testing and reporting with physician management of anticoagulation. Methods: Quasi-experiment study design with retrospective and prospective evaluation of warfarin management and patient satisfaction. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients enrolled in the anticoagulation clinic from January 1st, 2020 to June 30th, 2022. Patients, 18 years or older with an indication for warfarin and attendance of at least 3 anticoagulation appointments were included. The Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) was determined using the traditional method. TTR differences across the two groups were reported using descriptive, bi-variate, and multivariate statistics. All statistical tests were conducted using SAS 9.0. Patient satisfaction was collected for 6 months using a survey created by the investigators. Survey consisted of 18 questions using a 3-point Likert scale. Survey was assessed using descriptive statistics. Results: Thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, 26 were in the pharmacist management group with 609 appointments, and 11 patients were in the physician management group with 123 appointments. There was no statistical significance for the time in the therapeutic range between the pharmacist-managed group (60.7%) and the physician-managed group (59.4%); p-value of <0.829. Results of the satisfaction survey suggest that patients slightly prefer management by a pharmacist over a physician. Conclusion: Community-based pharmacist warfarin management of time in therapeutic range was equivalent to physician management and with similar patient satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区药剂师抗凝门诊结果与医生管理的比较。
背景:华法林有许多适应症,但它是唯一适用于机械性二尖瓣值和抗磷脂综合征的抗凝剂。药剂师可在医疗诊所进行管理。目标:评估由签订了合作实践协议(CPA)的社区药剂师管理与由医生管理时,国际标准化比值(INR)目标范围的百分比差异,并分析由签订了合作实践协议(CPA)的社区药剂师管理与由医生管理时,患者对抗凝诊所的满意度。实践描述:独立社区药房。实践创新:由社区药剂师管理的抗凝诊所。药剂师根据合作实践协议提供抗凝服务,或在医生管理抗凝的情况下进行 INR 检测和报告。方法:采用准实验研究设计,对华法林管理和患者满意度进行回顾性和前瞻性评估。对 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间在抗凝门诊登记的患者进行回顾性病历审查。研究对象包括有华法林适应症且至少参加过 3 次抗凝预约的 18 岁或以上患者。采用传统方法测定治疗范围内时间(TTR)。采用描述性、双变量和多变量统计方法报告两组间的 TTR 差异。所有统计测试均使用 SAS 9.0 进行。使用研究人员制作的调查表收集了患者 6 个月的满意度。调查包括 18 个问题,采用 3 点李克特量表。调查采用描述性统计方法进行评估。结果37 名患者符合纳入标准,药剂师管理组中有 26 名患者,共预约了 609 次,医生管理组中有 11 名患者,共预约了 123 次。药剂师管理组(60.7%)和医生管理组(59.4%)在治疗范围内的时间没有统计学意义;P 值为 结论:社区药剂师对华法林在治疗范围内时间的管理与医生管理相当,患者满意度也相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"I think deprescribing is very needed in our society:" Healthcare Professional Students Perceptions of Deprescribing Education. Accessibility of Diabetes Therapy Management for Patients with Visual Impairment. Assessment of Metformin Intolerance: A Retrospective Chart Review. Availability and Types of Pressure Ulcer Medications at Community Pharmacies in the Accra Metropolis of Ghana. Community-Based Pharmacists' Perspectives on Prescribing Authority for the Minor Ailments and Contraception Service in British Columbia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1