The implementation of national labour legislation in England after the Black Death, 1349–1400

Mark Bailey
{"title":"The implementation of national labour legislation in England after the Black Death, 1349–1400","authors":"Mark Bailey","doi":"10.1111/ehr.13355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The responses of labour markets to global pandemics are attracting renewed interest, although the English labour laws in response to the Black Death of 1348/9 – capping wages, imposing annual contracts, and restricting mobility – have a long and established scholarship. The conventional wisdom is that the legislation represented an extension of existing local practices and created common cause among all categories of employer. Yet this view is hard to reconcile with the fact that, despite subsequent revisions, the legislation soon failed. These arguments are tested through original research into how the legislation was actually enforced in a variety of legal tribunals (manorial, borough, and royal). A clear distinction is maintained between public presentments and private litigation, and a robust methodology is pursued to record their absence as well as quantifying their presence. This casts new light on the novelty of the labour laws, the reasons for their failure, and their influence on contract law. The analysis exemplifies the potential for short‐term legal responses to infectious diseases to have unintended and unanticipated long‐term consequences.","PeriodicalId":505850,"journal":{"name":"The Economic History Review","volume":"7 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The responses of labour markets to global pandemics are attracting renewed interest, although the English labour laws in response to the Black Death of 1348/9 – capping wages, imposing annual contracts, and restricting mobility – have a long and established scholarship. The conventional wisdom is that the legislation represented an extension of existing local practices and created common cause among all categories of employer. Yet this view is hard to reconcile with the fact that, despite subsequent revisions, the legislation soon failed. These arguments are tested through original research into how the legislation was actually enforced in a variety of legal tribunals (manorial, borough, and royal). A clear distinction is maintained between public presentments and private litigation, and a robust methodology is pursued to record their absence as well as quantifying their presence. This casts new light on the novelty of the labour laws, the reasons for their failure, and their influence on contract law. The analysis exemplifies the potential for short‐term legal responses to infectious diseases to have unintended and unanticipated long‐term consequences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1349-1400 年黑死病之后英格兰国家劳动立法的实施情况
尽管英国应对 1348/9 年黑死病的劳动法--规定工资上限、实行年度合同和限制流动性--具有悠久的学术史,但劳动力市场对全球流行病的反应再次引起人们的关注。传统观点认为,这些法律是对当地现有做法的延伸,为各类雇主创造了共同的事业。然而,这种观点很难与事实相协调,尽管后来进行了修订,但立法很快就失败了。通过对各种法庭(庄园法庭、自治市法庭和皇家法庭)实际执行立法的情况进行原创性研究,这些论点得到了验证。研究明确区分了公开陈述和私人诉讼,并采用可靠的方法来记录它们的缺失以及量化它们的存在。这为劳动法的新颖性、失败原因及其对合同法的影响提供了新的视角。该分析体现了针对传染病的短期法律应对措施有可能产生意想不到的长期后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overseas trade and taxation in England and Wales, c. 1680–1790 Red gold: Copper and the U.S. mobilization campaign, 1950–3 From the little divergence to the little divide: Real wages in the Kingdom of Sicily (1540‒1850) Respectable standards of living: The alternative lens of maintenance costs, Britain 1270–1860 UK fiscal policy and external balance under Bretton Woods: Twin deficits or distant relatives?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1