The use of small group based educational interventions in General Practice to improve antimicrobial prescribing behaviours: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

Kevin F. Roche, Anthony Maher, Eimear C. Morrissey, Rosie Dunne, Andrew W Murphy, Gerard J. Molloy
{"title":"The use of small group based educational interventions in General Practice to improve antimicrobial prescribing behaviours: a mixed methods systematic review protocol","authors":"Kevin F. Roche, Anthony Maher, Eimear C. Morrissey, Rosie Dunne, Andrew W Murphy, Gerard J. Molloy","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13878.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents in healthcare settings is one area that has received attention as a possible route to mitigate the threat of antimicrobial resistance. Globally, the highest consumption of antimicrobials in human healthcare originates from prescriptions in Primary Care. Strategies to increase appropriate antibiotic prescribing, which can mean not prescribing an antibiotic e.g. cases of viral infection, have been developed and evaluated. This systematic review aims to review the literature of studies of group based in person educational interventions designed to increase appropriate antibiotic prescribing behaviours in General Practice settings. Methods EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and PsycINFO will be systematically searched from inception until February 2024 for primary studies of group based educational interventions designed to improve the antimicrobial prescribing behaviours in General Practice. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies that report on the phenomenon of interest will be included. All identified articles will be double screened at title and abstract level. One reviewer will then screen all included studies at full text level, extract the data, code the intervention and perform risk of bias assessment with a second reviewer performing verification of a randomly selected 20% of the articles. We will use an integrated approach to mixed method systematic reviews and will perform a narrative, or if possible quantitative, synthesis. Discussion The review will identify and assess the efficacy and / or effectiveness of small group based educational interventions designed to improve the antibiotic prescribing behaviours of General Practitioners. By using a mixed methods approach we aim to identify the salient content of the included interventions and the perspectives of participants on the content and delivery of the included interventions. We will use the findings to inform the design and content of a small group educational intervention for GP registrars.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13878.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents in healthcare settings is one area that has received attention as a possible route to mitigate the threat of antimicrobial resistance. Globally, the highest consumption of antimicrobials in human healthcare originates from prescriptions in Primary Care. Strategies to increase appropriate antibiotic prescribing, which can mean not prescribing an antibiotic e.g. cases of viral infection, have been developed and evaluated. This systematic review aims to review the literature of studies of group based in person educational interventions designed to increase appropriate antibiotic prescribing behaviours in General Practice settings. Methods EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and PsycINFO will be systematically searched from inception until February 2024 for primary studies of group based educational interventions designed to improve the antimicrobial prescribing behaviours in General Practice. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies that report on the phenomenon of interest will be included. All identified articles will be double screened at title and abstract level. One reviewer will then screen all included studies at full text level, extract the data, code the intervention and perform risk of bias assessment with a second reviewer performing verification of a randomly selected 20% of the articles. We will use an integrated approach to mixed method systematic reviews and will perform a narrative, or if possible quantitative, synthesis. Discussion The review will identify and assess the efficacy and / or effectiveness of small group based educational interventions designed to improve the antibiotic prescribing behaviours of General Practitioners. By using a mixed methods approach we aim to identify the salient content of the included interventions and the perspectives of participants on the content and delivery of the included interventions. We will use the findings to inform the design and content of a small group educational intervention for GP registrars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全科医生中使用以小组为基础的教育干预措施来改善抗菌药物处方行为:混合方法系统性审查方案
背景 在医疗保健环境中抗菌剂的不当使用是一个备受关注的领域,也是减轻抗菌剂耐药性威胁的一个可能途径。在全球范围内,人类医疗保健中消耗最多的抗菌药来自初级保健处方。已经制定并评估了增加适当抗生素处方的策略,这可能意味着在病毒感染等情况下不开具抗生素处方。本系统性综述旨在综述以小组为基础、旨在提高全科医生抗生素处方合理性的个人教育干预研究文献。方法 将对 EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO 进行系统检索,检索时间从开始到 2024 年 2 月,检索对象为旨在改善全科医生抗菌药物处方行为的基于小组的教育干预的主要研究。将纳入报告相关现象的定性、定量和混合方法研究。所有确定的文章都将在标题和摘要层面进行双重筛选。然后,一名审稿人将对所有纳入的研究进行全文筛选、提取数据、对干预措施进行编码并进行偏倚风险评估,第二名审稿人将对随机抽取的 20% 的文章进行核实。我们将采用混合方法系统性综述的综合方法,并进行叙述性综述,或在可能的情况下进行定量综述。讨论 本综述将确定和评估旨在改善全科医生抗生素处方行为的以小组为基础的教育干预措施的效力和/或有效性。通过采用混合方法,我们旨在确定所纳入干预措施的主要内容以及参与者对所纳入干预措施的内容和实施的看法。我们将利用研究结果为针对全科医生注册人员的小组教育干预措施的设计和内容提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracking aspects of healthcare activity during the first nine months of COVID-19 in Ireland: a secondary analysis of publicly available data. Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Contextual factors and intentional rounding in acute hospitals: understanding what works, for whom, in what settings: a realist synthesis protocol. What is known from the existing literature about the treatment of Mallet Injury using 3D printed splints? A Scoping Review Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1