Comparative Analysis of CNN Architectures for SIBI Image Classification

Yulrio Brianorman, Dewi Utami
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of CNN Architectures for SIBI Image Classification","authors":"Yulrio Brianorman, Dewi Utami","doi":"10.30595/juita.v12i1.20608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classification of images from the Indonesian Sign Language System (SIBI) using VGG16, ResNet50, Inception, Xception, and MobileNetV2 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures is evaluated in this paper. With Google Colab Pro, a 224 × 224-pixel picture dataset was used for the study. A five-stage technique consisting of Dataset Collection, Dataset Preprocessing, Model Design, Model Training, and Model Testing was applied. Performance evaluation focused on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score. The results identified VGG16 as the top-performing model with an accuracy of 99.60% and an equivalent F1-Score, followed closely by ResNet50 with nearly similar performance. Inception, XCeption, and MobileNetV2 demonstrated balanced performance but with lower accuracy. This study sheds light on the best CNN models to choose for SIBI image classification, and it makes recommendations for further research that include using sophisticated data augmentation methods, investigating novel CNN architectures, and putting the models to practical use.","PeriodicalId":151254,"journal":{"name":"JUITA : Jurnal Informatika","volume":"66 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JUITA : Jurnal Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v12i1.20608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The classification of images from the Indonesian Sign Language System (SIBI) using VGG16, ResNet50, Inception, Xception, and MobileNetV2 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures is evaluated in this paper. With Google Colab Pro, a 224 × 224-pixel picture dataset was used for the study. A five-stage technique consisting of Dataset Collection, Dataset Preprocessing, Model Design, Model Training, and Model Testing was applied. Performance evaluation focused on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score. The results identified VGG16 as the top-performing model with an accuracy of 99.60% and an equivalent F1-Score, followed closely by ResNet50 with nearly similar performance. Inception, XCeption, and MobileNetV2 demonstrated balanced performance but with lower accuracy. This study sheds light on the best CNN models to choose for SIBI image classification, and it makes recommendations for further research that include using sophisticated data augmentation methods, investigating novel CNN architectures, and putting the models to practical use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于 SIBI 图像分类的 CNN 架构对比分析
本文评估了使用 VGG16、ResNet50、Inception、Xception 和 MobileNetV2 卷积神经网络(CNN)架构对印度尼西亚手语系统(SIBI)图像进行分类的情况。研究使用了 Google Colab Pro 的 224 × 224 像素图片数据集。研究采用了五阶段技术,包括数据集收集、数据集预处理、模型设计、模型训练和模型测试。性能评估的重点是准确率、精确度、召回率和 F1 分数。结果表明,VGG16 是表现最好的模型,准确率为 99.60%,F1-Score 与之相当,紧随其后的是 ResNet50,表现几乎相似。Inception、XCeption 和 MobileNetV2 表现均衡,但准确率较低。本研究揭示了用于 SIBI 图像分类的最佳 CNN 模型,并提出了进一步研究的建议,包括使用复杂的数据增强方法、研究新型 CNN 架构以及将模型投入实际使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Information Technology Adoption Potential in MSMEs: a Conceptual Model Based on TOE Framework Improving Stroke Detection with Hybrid Sampling and Cascade Generalization Comparative Study of Predictive Classification Models on Data with Severely Imbalanced Predictors Image Classification of Room Tidiness Using VGGNet with Data Augmentation Number of Cyber Attacks Predicted With Deep Learning Based LSTM Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1