Evaluation of the clinical impact of decreasing the maximum osmolarity of neonatal peripheral parenteral nutrition.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1002/jpn3.12259
Brooke Szachnowicz, Bethany Chalk, Kari Allan, Heidi Lochen, Caroline Liang
{"title":"Evaluation of the clinical impact of decreasing the maximum osmolarity of neonatal peripheral parenteral nutrition.","authors":"Brooke Szachnowicz, Bethany Chalk, Kari Allan, Heidi Lochen, Caroline Liang","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.12259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the clinical impact of lowering the peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) maximum osmolarity limit from 1000 to 900 mOsm/L in patients in two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study including inborn neonates that received PPN for at least 3 consecutive days within the first 14 days of life. Data were evaluated to compare the ability of PPN with a maximum osmolarity limit of 1000 to 900 mOsm/L to provide daily recommended macronutrient doses, and daily recommended goal calories, as well as to compare the incidence of significant peripheral intravenous (PIV) infiltrates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 PPN orders representing 57 patients were included for analysis, with 100 PPN orders in each osmolarity cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts. Significantly more PPN orders met goal amino acid doses (45% vs. 24%, p = 0.003) and goal intravenous fat emulsion (IVFE) doses (61% vs. 37%, p = 0.001) in the 1000 mOsm/L osmolarity limit cohort compared to the 900 mOsm/L osmolarity limit cohort. A total of three patients received hyaluronidase for PN infiltration, two in the 1000 mOsm/L osmolarity limit and one in the 900 mOsm/L osmolarity limit cohort (p = 0.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A lower PPN osmolarity limit of 900 mOsm/L significantly limited the ability to provide goal amino acid and IVFE doses to NICU patients compared to the previous osmolarity limit of 1000 mOsm/L without reducing the incidence of PIV infiltration or extravasation.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"674-678"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.12259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical impact of lowering the peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) maximum osmolarity limit from 1000 to 900 mOsm/L in patients in two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including inborn neonates that received PPN for at least 3 consecutive days within the first 14 days of life. Data were evaluated to compare the ability of PPN with a maximum osmolarity limit of 1000 to 900 mOsm/L to provide daily recommended macronutrient doses, and daily recommended goal calories, as well as to compare the incidence of significant peripheral intravenous (PIV) infiltrates.

Results: A total of 200 PPN orders representing 57 patients were included for analysis, with 100 PPN orders in each osmolarity cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts. Significantly more PPN orders met goal amino acid doses (45% vs. 24%, p = 0.003) and goal intravenous fat emulsion (IVFE) doses (61% vs. 37%, p = 0.001) in the 1000 mOsm/L osmolarity limit cohort compared to the 900 mOsm/L osmolarity limit cohort. A total of three patients received hyaluronidase for PN infiltration, two in the 1000 mOsm/L osmolarity limit and one in the 900 mOsm/L osmolarity limit cohort (p = 0.6).

Conclusion: A lower PPN osmolarity limit of 900 mOsm/L significantly limited the ability to provide goal amino acid and IVFE doses to NICU patients compared to the previous osmolarity limit of 1000 mOsm/L without reducing the incidence of PIV infiltration or extravasation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估降低新生儿外周肠外营养最大渗透压的临床影响。
目的描述将两个新生儿重症监护室(NICU)患者的外周肠外营养(PPN)最大渗透压限制从 1000 mOsm/L 降至 900 mOsm/L 的临床影响:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括在出生后 14 天内至少连续 3 天接受 PPN 的新生儿。对数据进行了评估,以比较最大渗透压限制为 1000 至 900 mOsm/L 的 PPN 提供每日推荐宏量营养素剂量和每日推荐目标热量的能力,以及比较明显外周静脉(PIV)浸润的发生率:共纳入了代表 57 名患者的 200 份 PPN 订单进行分析,每个渗透压队列中有 100 份 PPN 订单。两组患者的基线特征相似。与达到目标氨基酸剂量(45% 对 24%,p = 0.003)和目标静脉注射脂肪乳剂(IVFE)剂量(61% 对 37%,p = 0.001)的 1000 mOsm/L 渗透压限制队列中的 PPN 订单明显多于 900 mOsm/L 渗透压限制队列中的 PPN 订单。共有三名患者因 PN 浸润接受了透明质酸酶治疗,其中两名在 1000 mOsm/L 渗透压极限队列中,一名在 900 mOsm/L 渗透压极限队列中(p = 0.6):结论:与之前的 1000 mOsm/L 渗透压限值相比,900 mOsm/L 的较低 PPN 渗透压限值明显限制了为 NICU 患者提供目标氨基酸和 IVFE 剂量的能力,但没有降低 PIV 渗入或外渗的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1