Which emotion regulation strategy is efficient for whom? Reappraisal and suppression efficiency for adaptive and maladaptive personality profiles.

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12948
Elena Trentini, Elise Dan-Glauser
{"title":"Which emotion regulation strategy is efficient for whom? Reappraisal and suppression efficiency for adaptive and maladaptive personality profiles.","authors":"Elena Trentini, Elise Dan-Glauser","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the efficiency of different emotion regulation strategies, specifically reappraisal and suppression, in relation to adaptive and maladaptive personality profiles.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Personality conditions emotions and influences emotion regulation. Of the available regulation strategies, reappraisal (reinterpreting the situation) is described as an efficient strategy, whereas suppression (not displaying the experienced emotion) carries higher physiological and cognitive costs. Little is known, however, about the influence of personality on these efficiencies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We tested the personality structure of 102 participants (Mean<sub>age</sub> = 20.75, SD<sub>age</sub> = 2.15), based on the Five-Factor Model and the Maladaptive Personality Trait Model. Experience, expressivity, and physiological arousal were recorded during the viewing of emotionally charged positive and negative images while participants reappraised, suppressed, or viewed the images without regulating their emotions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified two clusters for adaptive personality (\"Adaptive Resilient\" and \"Anti-resilient\") and two for maladaptive personality (\"Maladaptive Resilient\" and \"Under-controlled\"). The major finding was for emotional experience in maladaptive personalities, where reappraisal was efficient in the Maladaptive Resilient profile, while none of the strategies brought relief in the Under-controlled profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study, which systematically contrasts personality and efficiency of emotion regulation strategies, is one of the first attempts to refine the understanding of how personality influences the emotional regulation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12948","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the efficiency of different emotion regulation strategies, specifically reappraisal and suppression, in relation to adaptive and maladaptive personality profiles.

Background: Personality conditions emotions and influences emotion regulation. Of the available regulation strategies, reappraisal (reinterpreting the situation) is described as an efficient strategy, whereas suppression (not displaying the experienced emotion) carries higher physiological and cognitive costs. Little is known, however, about the influence of personality on these efficiencies.

Method: We tested the personality structure of 102 participants (Meanage = 20.75, SDage = 2.15), based on the Five-Factor Model and the Maladaptive Personality Trait Model. Experience, expressivity, and physiological arousal were recorded during the viewing of emotionally charged positive and negative images while participants reappraised, suppressed, or viewed the images without regulating their emotions.

Results: We identified two clusters for adaptive personality ("Adaptive Resilient" and "Anti-resilient") and two for maladaptive personality ("Maladaptive Resilient" and "Under-controlled"). The major finding was for emotional experience in maladaptive personalities, where reappraisal was efficient in the Maladaptive Resilient profile, while none of the strategies brought relief in the Under-controlled profile.

Conclusion: This study, which systematically contrasts personality and efficiency of emotion regulation strategies, is one of the first attempts to refine the understanding of how personality influences the emotional regulation process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪种情绪调节策略对谁有效?适应型和适应不良型人格特征的重评和抑制效率。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨不同情绪调节策略的效率,特别是重评和压抑,与适应性人格和适应不良人格的关系:背景:人格是情绪的条件并影响情绪调节。在现有的调节策略中,重新评价(重新解释情境)被认为是一种有效的策略,而压抑(不表现出所经历的情绪)则需要付出更高的生理和认知成本。然而,人们对人格对这些效率的影响知之甚少:我们根据五因素模型和适应不良人格特质模型,测试了 102 名参与者(平均年龄 = 20.75,最小年龄 = 2.15)的人格结构。在观看带有情绪色彩的正面和负面图像时,记录参与者的体验、表达能力和生理唤醒,同时重新评估、抑制或在不调节情绪的情况下观看图像:我们发现了两个适应性人格集群("适应性复原力 "和 "反复原力")和两个适应性不良人格集群("适应性不良复原力 "和 "控制不足")。主要发现是在适应不良型人格的情绪体验方面,重新评估在适应不良型复原人格中是有效的,而在控制不足型人格中,没有任何一种策略可以缓解情绪:这项研究系统地对比了人格和情绪调节策略的效率,是完善人格如何影响情绪调节过程的认识的首次尝试之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Paragons of character-Character strengths and well-being of moral, creative, and religious exemplars. Who makes a more consistent first impression? Examining the structure and correlates of dissensus. Primary affective systems and personality: Disentangling the within-person reciprocal relationships. Development of beliefs in a just world among Chinese early adolescents and the predictive role of family factors: A three-wave longitudinal study. Purpose and goal pursuit as a self-sustaining system: Evidence of daily within-person reciprocity among adolescents in self-driven learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1