The role of Medicaid home- and community-based services in use of Medicare post-acute care

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14325
Sijiu Wang PhD, Rachel M. Werner MD, PhD, Norma B. Coe PhD, Rhys Chua MPH, MscA, Mingyu Qi MS, R. Tamara Konetzka PhD
{"title":"The role of Medicaid home- and community-based services in use of Medicare post-acute care","authors":"Sijiu Wang PhD,&nbsp;Rachel M. Werner MD, PhD,&nbsp;Norma B. Coe PhD,&nbsp;Rhys Chua MPH, MscA,&nbsp;Mingyu Qi MS,&nbsp;R. Tamara Konetzka PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Medicaid-funded long-term services and supports are increasingly provided through home- and community-based services (HCBS) to promote continued community living. While an emerging body of evidence examines the direct benefits and costs of HCBS, there may also be unexplored synergies with Medicare-funded post-acute care (PAC). This study aimed to provide empirical evidence on how the use of Medicaid HCBS influences Medicare PAC utilization among the dually enrolled.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\n \n <p>National Medicare claims, Medicaid claims, nursing home assessment data, and home health assessment data from 2016 to 2018.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>We estimated the relationship between prior Medicaid HCBS use and PAC (skilled nursing facilities [SNF] or home health) utilization in a national sample of duals with qualifying index hospitalizations. We used inverse probability weights to create balanced samples on observed characteristics and estimated multivariable regression with hospital fixed effects and extensive controls. We also conducted stratified analyses for key subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Extraction Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The primary sample included 887,598 hospital discharges from community-dwelling duals who had an eligible index hospitalization between April 1, 2016, and September 30, 2018.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>We found HCBS use was associated with a 9 percentage-point increase in the use of home health relative to SNF, conditional on using PAC, and a meaningful reduction in length of stay for those using SNF. In addition, in our primary sample, we found HCBS use to be associated with an overall increase in PAC use, given that the absolute increase in home health use was larger than the absolute decrease in SNF use. In other words, the use of Medicaid-funded HCBS was associated with a shift in Medicare-funded PAC use toward home-based settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings indicate potential synergies between Medicaid-funded HCBS and increased use of home-based PAC, suggesting policymakers should cautiously consider these dynamics in HCBS expansion efforts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6773.14325","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Medicaid-funded long-term services and supports are increasingly provided through home- and community-based services (HCBS) to promote continued community living. While an emerging body of evidence examines the direct benefits and costs of HCBS, there may also be unexplored synergies with Medicare-funded post-acute care (PAC). This study aimed to provide empirical evidence on how the use of Medicaid HCBS influences Medicare PAC utilization among the dually enrolled.

Data Sources

National Medicare claims, Medicaid claims, nursing home assessment data, and home health assessment data from 2016 to 2018.

Study Design

We estimated the relationship between prior Medicaid HCBS use and PAC (skilled nursing facilities [SNF] or home health) utilization in a national sample of duals with qualifying index hospitalizations. We used inverse probability weights to create balanced samples on observed characteristics and estimated multivariable regression with hospital fixed effects and extensive controls. We also conducted stratified analyses for key subgroups.

Data Extraction Methods

The primary sample included 887,598 hospital discharges from community-dwelling duals who had an eligible index hospitalization between April 1, 2016, and September 30, 2018.

Principal Findings

We found HCBS use was associated with a 9 percentage-point increase in the use of home health relative to SNF, conditional on using PAC, and a meaningful reduction in length of stay for those using SNF. In addition, in our primary sample, we found HCBS use to be associated with an overall increase in PAC use, given that the absolute increase in home health use was larger than the absolute decrease in SNF use. In other words, the use of Medicaid-funded HCBS was associated with a shift in Medicare-funded PAC use toward home-based settings.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate potential synergies between Medicaid-funded HCBS and increased use of home-based PAC, suggesting policymakers should cautiously consider these dynamics in HCBS expansion efforts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗补助家庭和社区服务在使用医疗保险急性期后护理中的作用。
目标:医疗补助计划(Medicaid)资助的长期服务和支持越来越多地通过家庭和社区服务(HCBS)来提供,以促进持续的社区生活。虽然越来越多的证据研究了以家庭和社区为基础的服务的直接效益和成本,但其与医疗补助计划(Medicare)资助的急性期后护理(PAC)之间的协同作用可能还未被发掘。本研究旨在提供实证证据,说明在双重参保者中,医疗补助 HCBS 的使用如何影响医疗保险 PAC 的使用:2016年至2018年的全国医疗保险索赔、医疗补助索赔、养老院评估数据和家庭健康评估数据:我们估算了具有合格指数住院的双重参保者的全国样本中,之前医疗补助 HCBS 使用情况与 PAC(专业护理设施 [SNF] 或家庭保健)使用情况之间的关系。我们使用反概率加权法创建了观察特征的平衡样本,并利用医院固定效应和广泛的控制措施进行了多变量回归估计。我们还对关键亚组进行了分层分析:主要样本包括在 2016 年 4 月 1 日至 2018 年 9 月 30 日期间符合条件的指数住院的 887,598 例社区居住的双职工出院病例:我们发现,在使用 PAC 的条件下,使用 HCBS 与使用 SNF 相比,家庭医疗的使用率增加了 9 个百分点,使用 SNF 的患者住院时间显著缩短。此外,在我们的主要样本中,我们发现 HCBS 的使用与 PAC 使用的整体增加有关,因为家庭医疗使用的绝对增幅大于 SNF 使用的绝对降幅。换句话说,使用医疗补助计划资助的 HCBS 与医疗保险计划资助的 PAC 向居家环境的转移有关:我们的研究结果表明,医疗补助资助的 HCBS 与居家 PAC 使用量的增加之间存在潜在的协同作用,这表明政策制定者在扩大 HCBS 时应谨慎考虑这些动态因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Quality improvement lessons learned from National Implementation of the "Patient Safety Events in Community Care: Reporting, Investigation, and Improvement Guidebook". Connecting unstably housed veterans living in rural areas to health care: Perspectives from Health Care Navigators. A structured approach to modifying an implementation package while scaling up a complex evidence-based practice. Evaluation of regional variation in racial and ethnic differences in patient experience among Veterans Health Administration primary care users. Effect of mental health staffing inputs on initiation of care among recently separated Veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1