Radiomics Nomogram Derived from Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT for Identifying Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Chunqing Zhou, Yi Xiao, Longxi Li, Yanyun Liu, Fubao Zhu, Weihua Zhou, Xiaoping Yi, Min Zhao
{"title":"Radiomics Nomogram Derived from Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT for Identifying Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Chunqing Zhou, Yi Xiao, Longxi Li, Yanyun Liu, Fubao Zhu, Weihua Zhou, Xiaoping Yi, Min Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01145-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personalized management involving heart failure (HF) etiology is crucial for better prognoses. We aim to evaluate the utility of a radiomics nomogram based on gated myocardial perfusion imaging (GMPI) in distinguishing ischemic from non-ischemic origins of HF. A total of 172 heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) who underwent GMPI scan were divided into training (n = 122) and validation sets (n = 50) based on chronological order of scans. Radiomics features were extracted from the resting GMPI. Four machine learning algorithms were used to construct radiomics models, and the model with the best performances were selected to calculate the Radscore. A radiomics nomogram was constructed based on the Radscore and independent clinical factors. Finally, the model performance was validated using operating characteristic curves, calibration curve, decision curve analysis, integrated discrimination improvement values (IDI), and the net reclassification index (NRI). Three optimal radiomics features were used to build a radiomics model. Total perfusion deficit (TPD) was identified as the independent factors of conventional GMPI metrics for building the GMPI model. In the validation set, the radiomics nomogram integrating the Radscore, age, systolic blood pressure, and TPD significantly outperformed the GMPI model in distinguishing ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) from non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (AUC 0.853 vs. 0.707, p = 0.038). IDI analysis indicated that the nomogram improved diagnostic accuracy by 28.3% compared to the GMPI model in the validation set. By combining radiomics signatures with clinical indicators, we developed a GMPI-based radiomics nomogram that helps to identify the ischemic etiology of HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2784-2793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01145-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personalized management involving heart failure (HF) etiology is crucial for better prognoses. We aim to evaluate the utility of a radiomics nomogram based on gated myocardial perfusion imaging (GMPI) in distinguishing ischemic from non-ischemic origins of HF. A total of 172 heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) who underwent GMPI scan were divided into training (n = 122) and validation sets (n = 50) based on chronological order of scans. Radiomics features were extracted from the resting GMPI. Four machine learning algorithms were used to construct radiomics models, and the model with the best performances were selected to calculate the Radscore. A radiomics nomogram was constructed based on the Radscore and independent clinical factors. Finally, the model performance was validated using operating characteristic curves, calibration curve, decision curve analysis, integrated discrimination improvement values (IDI), and the net reclassification index (NRI). Three optimal radiomics features were used to build a radiomics model. Total perfusion deficit (TPD) was identified as the independent factors of conventional GMPI metrics for building the GMPI model. In the validation set, the radiomics nomogram integrating the Radscore, age, systolic blood pressure, and TPD significantly outperformed the GMPI model in distinguishing ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) from non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (AUC 0.853 vs. 0.707, p = 0.038). IDI analysis indicated that the nomogram improved diagnostic accuracy by 28.3% compared to the GMPI model in the validation set. By combining radiomics signatures with clinical indicators, we developed a GMPI-based radiomics nomogram that helps to identify the ischemic etiology of HFrEF.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于识别缺血性心肌病的门控心肌灌注 SPECT 放射计量学提名图
涉及心力衰竭(HF)病因的个性化管理对于改善预后至关重要。我们的目的是评估基于门控心肌灌注成像(GMPI)的放射组学提名图在区分缺血性和非缺血性心力衰竭方面的实用性。根据扫描的时间顺序,将172名接受GMPI扫描的左室射血分数降低的心衰患者分为训练组(122人)和验证组(50人)。从静息 GMPI 中提取放射组学特征。使用四种机器学习算法构建放射组学模型,并选择性能最佳的模型计算 Radscore。根据 Radscore 和独立的临床因素构建了放射组学提名图。最后,利用运行特征曲线、校准曲线、决策曲线分析、综合分辨改进值(IDI)和净再分类指数(NRI)对模型性能进行了验证。三个最佳放射组学特征被用于建立放射组学模型。总灌注缺损(TPD)被确定为常规 GMPI 指标的独立因素,用于建立 GMPI 模型。在验证集中,整合了 Radscore、年龄、收缩压和 TPD 的放射组学提名图在区分缺血性心肌病 (ICM) 和非缺血性心肌病 (NICM) 方面的表现明显优于 GMPI 模型(AUC 0.853 vs. 0.707,p = 0.038)。IDI 分析表明,与验证集中的 GMPI 模型相比,提名图的诊断准确率提高了 28.3%。通过将放射组学特征与临床指标相结合,我们开发出了一种基于 GMPI 的放射组学提名图,有助于识别 HFrEF 的缺血性病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Faster Privacy-Preserving Medical Image Diagnosis Scheme with Machine Learning. Combining the Variational and Deep Learning Techniques for Classification of Video Capsule Endoscopic Images. Enhancing Radiographic Diagnosis: CycleGAN-Based Methods for Reducing Cast Shadow Artifacts in Wrist Radiographs. Governance Considerations for Point-of-Care Ultrasound: a HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Community Whitepaper in Collaboration with AIUM. Adaptive Compression and Reconstruction for Multidimensional Medical Image Data: A Hybrid Algorithm for Enhanced Image Quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1