Influence of Pregnancy Intention on Postpartum Contraceptive Choice at an Urban Academic Medical Center.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1055/a-2335-2951
Meghan St John, Kirby Sullivan, Emily A DeFranco, Elizabeth Kelly
{"title":"Influence of Pregnancy Intention on Postpartum Contraceptive Choice at an Urban Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Meghan St John, Kirby Sullivan, Emily A DeFranco, Elizabeth Kelly","doi":"10.1055/a-2335-2951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to describe postpartum contraception preferences in the context of pregnancy intention (PI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> A prospective cohort study analyzing postpartum contraceptive choice (PCC) in 431 postpartum women who delivered at a single academic medical center. PCC in women with an unintended or mistimed pregnancy was compared to contraceptive choice in women with an intended pregnancy using the adapted National Survey of Family Growth categorization. Mistimed and unintended pregnancies were grouped for analysis. Generalized linear modeling estimated the relative influence of PI on PCC adjusting for maternal age, race, and parity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Nearly three out of four (71.9%) pregnancies were mistimed or unintended. These pregnancies were more likely in women who were non-Hispanic Black (62.3%), unmarried (86.3%), 18 to 24 years (51.3%), and insured by Medicaid or Medicare (82.1%), compared to women with an intended pregnancy, <i>p</i>-value <0.001. Women with mistimed or unintended pregnancy were 83% more likely to choose highly effective, user-independent methods compared to any other or no method, adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36, 2.47), and more likely to desire voluntary sterilization, aRR = 2.70 (95% CI: 1.58, 4.59). Additionally, women with these pregnancies were 56% more likely to use user-independent methods compared to user-dependent methods, aRR = 1.56 (95% CI: 1.18, 2.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Women with mistimed or unintended pregnancies are 83% more likely to choose highly effective postpartum contraception or voluntary sterilization, and thus initiatives are necessary to increase access and affordability to these methods before hospital discharge after delivery.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Nearly three out of four pregnancies in this study were mistimed or unintended.. · Women with mistimed or unintended pregnancies are more likely to choose highly effective postpartum contraception or voluntary sterilization.. · Public health initiatives to improve access to family planning services and postpartum contraception, including surgery for bilateral tubal ligation before discharge from the hospital postdelivery, are important areas of focus to help attenuate the rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"196-203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2335-2951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  This study aimed to describe postpartum contraception preferences in the context of pregnancy intention (PI).

Study design:  A prospective cohort study analyzing postpartum contraceptive choice (PCC) in 431 postpartum women who delivered at a single academic medical center. PCC in women with an unintended or mistimed pregnancy was compared to contraceptive choice in women with an intended pregnancy using the adapted National Survey of Family Growth categorization. Mistimed and unintended pregnancies were grouped for analysis. Generalized linear modeling estimated the relative influence of PI on PCC adjusting for maternal age, race, and parity.

Results:  Nearly three out of four (71.9%) pregnancies were mistimed or unintended. These pregnancies were more likely in women who were non-Hispanic Black (62.3%), unmarried (86.3%), 18 to 24 years (51.3%), and insured by Medicaid or Medicare (82.1%), compared to women with an intended pregnancy, p-value <0.001. Women with mistimed or unintended pregnancy were 83% more likely to choose highly effective, user-independent methods compared to any other or no method, adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36, 2.47), and more likely to desire voluntary sterilization, aRR = 2.70 (95% CI: 1.58, 4.59). Additionally, women with these pregnancies were 56% more likely to use user-independent methods compared to user-dependent methods, aRR = 1.56 (95% CI: 1.18, 2.06).

Conclusion:  Women with mistimed or unintended pregnancies are 83% more likely to choose highly effective postpartum contraception or voluntary sterilization, and thus initiatives are necessary to increase access and affordability to these methods before hospital discharge after delivery.

Key points: · Nearly three out of four pregnancies in this study were mistimed or unintended.. · Women with mistimed or unintended pregnancies are more likely to choose highly effective postpartum contraception or voluntary sterilization.. · Public health initiatives to improve access to family planning services and postpartum contraception, including surgery for bilateral tubal ligation before discharge from the hospital postdelivery, are important areas of focus to help attenuate the rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States..

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一家城市学术医疗中心的怀孕意向对产后避孕选择的影响。
目的:描述怀孕意向(PI)背景下的产后避孕偏好:描述怀孕意愿(PI)背景下的产后避孕偏好:前瞻性队列研究分析了在一家学术医疗中心分娩的 431 名产后妇女的产后避孕选择。采用改编的《全国家庭成长调查》分类法,将意外怀孕或错误怀孕妇女的产后避孕药具选择(PCC)与计划怀孕妇女的避孕药具选择进行比较。在进行分析时,将误期妊娠和意外妊娠进行了分组。广义线性模型估计了 PI 对 PCC 的相对影响,并对产妇年龄、种族和奇偶数进行了调整:结果:近四分之三(71.9%)的妊娠属于时间不当或意外妊娠。与计划怀孕的妇女相比,非西班牙裔黑人妇女(62.3%)、未婚妇女(86.3%)、18-24 岁妇女(51.3%)、有医疗补助计划或医疗保险的妇女(82.1%)更容易发生此类妊娠,P 值为 结论:时机不对或意外怀孕的妇女选择高效产后避孕或自愿绝育的几率要高出 83%,因此有必要在产后出院前采取一些措施来增加这些方法的可及性和可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Risk Profiling In Vitro Fertilization Pregnancies that Develop Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Large for Gestational Age and Adverse Outcomes: Stratified By Diabetes Status. Associations between Parental Engagement in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status. Screening for Bacterial Vaginosis Prior to Delivery: A Cost-Effectiveness Study. Placental SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Its Implications for Increased Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1