Socio-Economic Status and Bullying Victimization in India: A Study About Social Misfit and Minority Perception.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Youth and Adolescence Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s10964-024-02021-7
Niharika Thakkar, Mitch van Geel, Maike Malda, Ralph Rippe, Paul Vedder
{"title":"Socio-Economic Status and Bullying Victimization in India: A Study About Social Misfit and Minority Perception.","authors":"Niharika Thakkar, Mitch van Geel, Maike Malda, Ralph Rippe, Paul Vedder","doi":"10.1007/s10964-024-02021-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Social Misfit Theory, which states that some individuals deviate from what is normative in a community and may therefore be more likely to be victimized, has mostly been studied in Western countries. The current study addresses in a longitudinal sample whether socio-economic minorities (SES) in the classroom (a contextual SES minority) are more likely to become victims of bullying in India, and whether the relation between minority status and victimization is mediated by perception of oneself as a minority. The current study used three waves separated by three month intervals. A sample of youth from Indore India (grades 7 to 9; N = 1238; M-age<sub>T1</sub> = 13.15, SD = 1.16, 24 percent girls) was used. It was found that being a contextual SES minority was related to more victimization, but only when the contextual status was corroborated by the perceived minority status. However, over time, being part of a contextual minority predicted decreased victimization, possibly pointing to normative beliefs and values in the Indian context. The results of this study are in contrast to the Social Misfit Theory, but do support self-perception as a mediator.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":"32-45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-02021-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Social Misfit Theory, which states that some individuals deviate from what is normative in a community and may therefore be more likely to be victimized, has mostly been studied in Western countries. The current study addresses in a longitudinal sample whether socio-economic minorities (SES) in the classroom (a contextual SES minority) are more likely to become victims of bullying in India, and whether the relation between minority status and victimization is mediated by perception of oneself as a minority. The current study used three waves separated by three month intervals. A sample of youth from Indore India (grades 7 to 9; N = 1238; M-ageT1 = 13.15, SD = 1.16, 24 percent girls) was used. It was found that being a contextual SES minority was related to more victimization, but only when the contextual status was corroborated by the perceived minority status. However, over time, being part of a contextual minority predicted decreased victimization, possibly pointing to normative beliefs and values in the Indian context. The results of this study are in contrast to the Social Misfit Theory, but do support self-perception as a mediator.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度的社会经济地位与欺凌受害者:关于社会不公和少数群体观念的研究》。
社会不适应理论(Social Misfit Theory)认为,有些人偏离了社会规范,因此更有可能成为受害者。本研究通过纵向抽样调查,探讨在印度,班级中的社会经济少数群体(SES)(背景SES少数群体)是否更有可能成为欺凌行为的受害者,以及少数群体身份与受害之间的关系是否会受到将自己视为少数群体的影响。本次研究共进行了三次调查,每次调查间隔三个月。样本来自印度印多尔的青少年(7 至 9 年级;N = 1238;M-ageT1 = 13.15,SD = 1.16,24% 为女生)。研究发现,在社会经济地位方面属于少数群体与受害程度较高有关,但只有在认为自己属于少数群体的情况下,这种情况才会得到证实。然而,随着时间的推移,作为背景少数群体中的一员,受害情况会有所减少,这可能与印度背景下的规范信仰和价值观有关。这项研究的结果与 "社会错位理论"(Social Misfit Theory)形成了鲜明对比,但确实支持将自我认知作为一种中介因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
期刊最新文献
Parent-Adolescent Discrepancies in Perceiving Parental Psychological Control and Autonomy Support Predict Adolescents’ Psychological Adjustment: Does Adolescent Gender Make a Difference? Parents’ and Peers’ Messages about Race: Associations with White Emerging Adults’ Responses to Feedback about Implicit Bias The Relationship Between Co-rumination and Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Neighborhood Disadvantage, Parenting, and Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms in Mexican-Origin Families: Moderating Role of Discrimination The Bidirectional Relations Between Parental Autonomy Support, Gratitude and Academic Engagement in Chinese Adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1