Thiazide Diuretic Utilization Within the VA.

Kiana Green, Augustus Hough
{"title":"Thiazide Diuretic Utilization Within the VA.","authors":"Kiana Green, Augustus Hough","doi":"10.12788/fp.0439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure guideline recommends chlorthalidone as the preferred thiazide diuretic. We aimed to better understand thiazide prescribing patterns within the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with a prescription for hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), chlorthalidone, indapamide, or any combination products containing these from January 1, 2016, to January 21, 2022. The primary objective was to determine the utilization rates of each thiazide in the active cohort, assessed via χ<sup>2</sup> test with Bonferroni correction. Secondary objectives included concomitant potassium or magnesium supplementation, blood pressure rates and control, and thiazide use from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 628,994 active thiazide prescriptions, utilization rates differed significantly between thiazide groups (<i>P</i> < .001). Rates for HCTZ, chlorthalidone, and indapamide were 84.6%, 14.9%, and 0.5%, respectively. HCTZ use decreased from 90.2% to 83.5% (<i>P</i> < .001) and chlorthalidone use increased from 9.3% to 16.0% (<i>P</i> < .001). Between thiazide groups, rates of blood pressure control were not significantly different (<i>P</i> = .58). Potassium or magnesium supplementation was significantly different between groups (<i>P</i> < .001). The highest concomitant supplementation was with indapamide followed by chlorthalidone and HCTZ with rates of 27.1%, 22.6%, and 12.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite guideline recommendations for chlorthalidone, HCTZ is the most prescribed thiazide diuretic within the VA. However, there was a significant trend toward increased chlorthalidone prescribing from 2016 to 2021. Application of these data may guide further research to increase guideline-recommended therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11132188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure guideline recommends chlorthalidone as the preferred thiazide diuretic. We aimed to better understand thiazide prescribing patterns within the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with a prescription for hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), chlorthalidone, indapamide, or any combination products containing these from January 1, 2016, to January 21, 2022. The primary objective was to determine the utilization rates of each thiazide in the active cohort, assessed via χ2 test with Bonferroni correction. Secondary objectives included concomitant potassium or magnesium supplementation, blood pressure rates and control, and thiazide use from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021.

Results: Of 628,994 active thiazide prescriptions, utilization rates differed significantly between thiazide groups (P < .001). Rates for HCTZ, chlorthalidone, and indapamide were 84.6%, 14.9%, and 0.5%, respectively. HCTZ use decreased from 90.2% to 83.5% (P < .001) and chlorthalidone use increased from 9.3% to 16.0% (P < .001). Between thiazide groups, rates of blood pressure control were not significantly different (P = .58). Potassium or magnesium supplementation was significantly different between groups (P < .001). The highest concomitant supplementation was with indapamide followed by chlorthalidone and HCTZ with rates of 27.1%, 22.6%, and 12.4%, respectively.

Conclusions: Despite guideline recommendations for chlorthalidone, HCTZ is the most prescribed thiazide diuretic within the VA. However, there was a significant trend toward increased chlorthalidone prescribing from 2016 to 2021. Application of these data may guide further research to increase guideline-recommended therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退伍军人事务部内噻嗪类利尿剂的使用情况。
背景:2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会血压指南推荐氯沙坦为首选噻嗪类利尿剂。我们旨在更好地了解美国退伍军人事务部(VA)的噻嗪类处方模式:我们对 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 21 日期间开具氢氯噻嗪 (HCTZ)、氯沙利酮、吲哒帕胺或任何含有这些药物的复方产品处方的患者进行了回顾性分析。首要目标是确定活动队列中每种噻嗪类药物的使用率,通过χ2检验和Bonferroni校正进行评估。次要目标包括同时补充钾或镁,血压比率和控制,以及从 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日的噻嗪类药物使用情况:在 628,994 份有效噻嗪类药物处方中,不同噻嗪类药物组的使用率差异显著(P < .001)。HCTZ、氯沙利酮和吲哒帕胺的使用率分别为84.6%、14.9%和0.5%。HCTZ的使用率从90.2%降至83.5%(P < .001),氯塞酮的使用率从9.3%增至16.0%(P < .001)。噻嗪类药物组之间的血压控制率差异不大(P = .58)。钾或镁的补充在不同组间有显著差异(P < .001)。吲达帕胺的同时补充率最高,其次是氯沙坦和HCTZ,分别为27.1%、22.6%和12.4%:尽管指南推荐使用氯塞酮,但在退伍军人事务部,HCTZ仍是处方量最大的噻嗪类利尿剂。然而,从 2016 年到 2021 年,氯塞酮的处方量有明显增加的趋势。应用这些数据可指导进一步的研究,以增加指南推荐的疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Masked as Suspected Hepatic Abscesses. 3D Printing for the Development of Palatal Defect Prosthetics. EBER-Negative, Double-Hit High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma Responding to Methotrexate Discontinuation. Improving Fecal Immunochemical Test Collection for Colorectal Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Potential Impact of USPS Mail Delivery Delays on Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1