Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1093/jac/dkae163
Yonatan M Mesfin, Joseph E Blais, Kelemu Tilahun Kibret, Teketo Kassaw Tegegne, Benjamin J Cowling, Peng Wu
{"title":"Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.","authors":"Yonatan M Mesfin, Joseph E Blais, Kelemu Tilahun Kibret, Teketo Kassaw Tegegne, Benjamin J Cowling, Peng Wu","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkae163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir among vaccinated and unvaccinated non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational studies of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir compared to no antiviral drug treatment for COVID-19 in non-hospitalized adults with data on vaccination status were included. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO COVID-19 Research Database and medRxiv for reports published between 1 January 2022 and 8 November 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization or mortality up to 35 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HR) and risk differences (RD) were separately estimated using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 30 cohort studies on adults treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 462 279) and molnupiravir (n = 48 008). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir probably reduced the composite outcome (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.55-0.70; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty) with no evidence of effect modification by vaccination status (RR Psubgroup = 0.47). In five studies, RD estimates against the composite outcome for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were 1.21% (95%CI 0.57% to 1.84%) in vaccinated and 1.72% (95%CI 0.59% to 2.85%) in unvaccinated subgroups.Molnupiravir may slightly reduce the composite outcome (RR 0.75, 95%CI 0.67-0.85; I2 = 32%; low certainty). Evidence of effect modification by vaccination status was inconsistent among studies reporting different effect measures (RR Psubgroup = 0.78; HR Psubgroup = 0.08). In two studies, RD against the composite outcome for molnupiravir were -0.01% (95%CI -1.13% to 1.10%) in vaccinated and 1.73% (95%CI -2.08% to 5.53%) in unvaccinated subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among cohort studies of non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is effective against the composite outcome of severe COVID-19 independent of vaccination status. Further research and a reassessment of molnupiravir use among vaccinated adults are warranted.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023429232.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir among vaccinated and unvaccinated non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19.

Methods: Observational studies of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir compared to no antiviral drug treatment for COVID-19 in non-hospitalized adults with data on vaccination status were included. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO COVID-19 Research Database and medRxiv for reports published between 1 January 2022 and 8 November 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization or mortality up to 35 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HR) and risk differences (RD) were separately estimated using random-effects models.

Results: We included 30 cohort studies on adults treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 462 279) and molnupiravir (n = 48 008). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir probably reduced the composite outcome (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.55-0.70; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty) with no evidence of effect modification by vaccination status (RR Psubgroup = 0.47). In five studies, RD estimates against the composite outcome for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were 1.21% (95%CI 0.57% to 1.84%) in vaccinated and 1.72% (95%CI 0.59% to 2.85%) in unvaccinated subgroups.Molnupiravir may slightly reduce the composite outcome (RR 0.75, 95%CI 0.67-0.85; I2 = 32%; low certainty). Evidence of effect modification by vaccination status was inconsistent among studies reporting different effect measures (RR Psubgroup = 0.78; HR Psubgroup = 0.08). In two studies, RD against the composite outcome for molnupiravir were -0.01% (95%CI -1.13% to 1.10%) in vaccinated and 1.73% (95%CI -2.08% to 5.53%) in unvaccinated subgroups.

Conclusions: Among cohort studies of non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is effective against the composite outcome of severe COVID-19 independent of vaccination status. Further research and a reassessment of molnupiravir use among vaccinated adults are warranted.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023429232.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼马瑞韦/利托那韦和molnupiravir对非住院成人COVID-19患者的疗效:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的确定尼马瑞韦/利托那韦和莫仑吡拉韦对已接种和未接种COVID-19疫苗的非住院成人患者的疗效:方法: 纳入了在有疫苗接种情况数据的非住院成年人中进行的关于尼马瑞韦/利托那韦或莫仑吡拉韦与不使用抗病毒药物治疗 COVID-19 的观察性研究。我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science、WHO COVID-19 研究数据库和 medRxiv 中 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 8 日期间发表的报告。主要研究结果是COVID-19确诊后35天内住院或死亡的综合结果。偏倚风险采用 ROBINS-I 进行评估。使用随机效应模型分别估算了风险比(RR)、危险比(HR)和风险差异(RD):结果:我们纳入了 30 项队列研究,研究对象是接受尼尔马特韦/利托那韦(n = 462 279)和莫鲁吡拉韦(n = 48 008)治疗的成人。Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir很可能会降低综合结果(RR 0.62,95%CI 0.55-0.70;I2 = 0%;中等确定性),没有证据表明疫苗接种状态会改变效果(RR Psubgroup = 0.47)。在五项研究中,接种过nirmatrelvir/ritonavir的亚组和未接种过nirmatrelvir/ritonavir的亚组对综合结果的RD估计值分别为1.21%(95%CI为0.57%至1.84%)和1.72%(95%CI为0.59%至2.85%),Molnupiravir可能会略微降低综合结果(RR为0.75,95%CI为0.67-0.85;I2=32%;低度确定性)。在报告不同效果测量指标的研究中,疫苗接种状况对效果影响的证据并不一致(RR Psubgroup = 0.78;HR Psubgroup = 0.08)。在两项研究中,接种疫苗的亚组和未接种疫苗的亚组对莫仑吡韦综合结果的RD分别为-0.01%(95%CI-1.13%至1.10%)和1.73%(95%CI-2.08%至5.53%):在对患有 COVID-19 的非住院成人进行的队列研究中,尼马瑞韦/利托那韦对重症 COVID-19 的综合结果有效,与疫苗接种情况无关。有必要开展进一步研究,并重新评估在接种疫苗的成人中使用molnupiravir的情况:注册号:PREMCORD42023429232。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
期刊最新文献
Use of echinocandin outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infection caused by Candida spp.: utilization, outcomes and impact of a change to weekly dosing Comparative evaluation of early treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam versus ceftazidime/avibactam for non-COVID-19 patients with pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Restoring vancomycin activity against resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a transcription factor decoy as a vanA operon-inhibitor. Clinically important interactions of macrolides and tetracyclines with dietary interventions—a systematic review with meta-analyses Population pharmacokinetics of unbound cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent high-flux haemodialysis: can a three-times-weekly post-dialysis dosing regimen provide optimal treatment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1