Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.3928/01913913-20240425-02
Taher K Eleiwa, Qais A Dihan, Andrew D Brown, Ana T Zaldivar, Seif E Abdelnaem, Ahmed B Sallam, Paul H Phillips, Ayman G Elnahry, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny
{"title":"Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria.","authors":"Taher K Eleiwa, Qais A Dihan, Andrew D Brown, Ana T Zaldivar, Seif E Abdelnaem, Ahmed B Sallam, Paul H Phillips, Ayman G Elnahry, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny","doi":"10.3928/01913913-20240425-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the quality, reliability, and readability of online patient educational materials on leukocoria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, the Google search engine was searched for the terms \"leukocoria\" and \"white pupil.\" The first 50 search outcomes were evaluated for each search term based on predefined inclusion criteria, excluding duplicates, peer-reviewed papers, forum posts, paywalled content, and multimedia links. Sources were categorized as \"institutional\" or \"private.\" Three independent raters assessed each web-site for quality and reliability using DISCERN, Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode), and JAMA criteria. Readability was evaluated using seven formulas: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, Automated Readability Index (ARI), Linsear Write (LW), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), and Coleman-Liau Index (CLI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 websites were included. Quality, assessed by the DISCERN tool, showed a median score of 4, denoting moderate to high quality, with no significant differences between institutional and private sites or search terms. HONcode scores indicated variable reliability and trustworthiness (median: 10, range: 3 to 16), with institutional sites excelling in financial disclosure and ad differentiation. Additionally, institutional and private sites performed well in reliability and accountability, as measured by the JAMA Benchmark criteria (median: 3; range: 1 to 4). Readability, averaging an 11.3 ± 3.7 grade level, did not differ significantly between site types or search terms, consistently falling short of the recommended sixth-grade level for patient educational materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient educational materials on leukocoria demonstrated moderate to high quality, commendable reliability, and accountability. However, the readability scores were above the recommended level for the layperson. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 2024;61(5):332-338.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20240425-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the quality, reliability, and readability of online patient educational materials on leukocoria.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the Google search engine was searched for the terms "leukocoria" and "white pupil." The first 50 search outcomes were evaluated for each search term based on predefined inclusion criteria, excluding duplicates, peer-reviewed papers, forum posts, paywalled content, and multimedia links. Sources were categorized as "institutional" or "private." Three independent raters assessed each web-site for quality and reliability using DISCERN, Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode), and JAMA criteria. Readability was evaluated using seven formulas: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, Automated Readability Index (ARI), Linsear Write (LW), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), and Coleman-Liau Index (CLI).

Results: A total of 51 websites were included. Quality, assessed by the DISCERN tool, showed a median score of 4, denoting moderate to high quality, with no significant differences between institutional and private sites or search terms. HONcode scores indicated variable reliability and trustworthiness (median: 10, range: 3 to 16), with institutional sites excelling in financial disclosure and ad differentiation. Additionally, institutional and private sites performed well in reliability and accountability, as measured by the JAMA Benchmark criteria (median: 3; range: 1 to 4). Readability, averaging an 11.3 ± 3.7 grade level, did not differ significantly between site types or search terms, consistently falling short of the recommended sixth-grade level for patient educational materials.

Conclusions: The patient educational materials on leukocoria demonstrated moderate to high quality, commendable reliability, and accountability. However, the readability scores were above the recommended level for the layperson. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(5):332-338.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白血病在线信息的质量、可靠性、可读性和问责制。
目的:评估有关白瞳的在线患者教育材料的质量、可靠性和可读性:在这项横向研究中,我们在谷歌搜索引擎上搜索了 "白瞳 "和 "白瞳 "这两个词。根据预定义的纳入标准,对每个搜索词的前 50 个搜索结果进行评估,排除重复内容、同行评审论文、论坛帖子、付费内容和多媒体链接。来源被分为 "机构 "和 "私人 "两类。三位独立评分员使用 DISCERN、Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode) 和 JAMA 标准对每个网站的质量和可靠性进行评估。可读性使用七个公式进行评估:Flesch Reading Ease (FRE)、Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL)、Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index、Automated Readability Index (ARI)、Linsear Write (LW)、Gunning Fog Index (GFI) 和 Coleman-Liau Index (CLI):共纳入 51 个网站。通过 DISCERN 工具进行的质量评估显示,中位数为 4 分,表示质量为中上等,机构网站与私人网站或搜索词之间没有显著差异。HONcode 分数显示了不同的可靠性和可信度(中位数:10,范围:3 至 16),其中机构网站在财务披露和广告区分方面表现突出。此外,根据《美国医学会杂志》基准标准(中位数:3;范围:1 至 4),机构网站和私营网站在可靠性和问责制方面表现出色。可读性平均为 11.3 ± 3.7 级,不同网站类型或搜索条件之间没有显著差异,始终低于建议的患者教育材料六级水平:结论:有关白癫风的患者教育材料显示出中等到较高的质量、值得称赞的可靠性和责任性。然而,可读性得分高于建议的非专业人士水平。[J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication for pediatric ophthalmologists. The Journal has published original articles on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of eye disorders in the pediatric age group and the treatment of strabismus in all age groups for over 50 years.
期刊最新文献
Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Horizontal Nystagmus: Effect on the Frequency of the Oscillation on a Pediatric Population. Incidence, Risk Factors and Development of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Mid-Preterm and Late-Preterm Infants. Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria. Long-term Ocular Alignment and Sensory Outcomes After Medial Rectus Recession for High AC/A Ratio Esotropia. Long-term, Low-Dose Oral Azithromycin Treatment for Chronic Severe Bilateral Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in Pediatric Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1