Preliminary validation of the Norwegian version of the Berlin Misophonia Questionnaire Revised (BMQ-R-NOR).

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Scandinavian journal of psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1111/sjop.13030
Eirin Krog, Andreas Falck, Guri Engernes Nielsen
{"title":"Preliminary validation of the Norwegian version of the Berlin Misophonia Questionnaire Revised (BMQ-R-NOR).","authors":"Eirin Krog, Andreas Falck, Guri Engernes Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/sjop.13030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a psychometric evaluation of a Norwegian version of the Berlin Misophonia Questionnaire Revised (BMQ-R-NOR).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants completed online versions of the self-report questionnaire BMQ-R-NOR on two occasions and MQ-NOR on one occasion. Convergent validity was assessed through Spearman's correlation between BMQ-R-NOR and MQ-NOR. Internal consistency was evaluated with McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using Cohen's weighted kappa and intraclass correlation.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>82 participants with self-reported misophonia took part in the study at T1, and 53 of these participated at T2. However, only 41 of them were included in the test-retest analyses due to 12 participants being in treatment between T1 and T2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subscales from the BMQ-R-NOR and MQ-NOR were significantly positively correlated, indicating evidence of convergent validity (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.22*-0.74**). The BMQ-R-NOR showed overall good internal consistency (omega = 0.72-0.93; alpha = 0.70-0.93) and satisfactory test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.35-0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The psychometric properties of the BMQ-R-NOR are considered satisfactory. However, it is advised to exercise caution when using it until further comprehensive validation studies are conducted to ensure robustness and reliability in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21435,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To perform a psychometric evaluation of a Norwegian version of the Berlin Misophonia Questionnaire Revised (BMQ-R-NOR).

Design: Participants completed online versions of the self-report questionnaire BMQ-R-NOR on two occasions and MQ-NOR on one occasion. Convergent validity was assessed through Spearman's correlation between BMQ-R-NOR and MQ-NOR. Internal consistency was evaluated with McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using Cohen's weighted kappa and intraclass correlation.

Study sample: 82 participants with self-reported misophonia took part in the study at T1, and 53 of these participated at T2. However, only 41 of them were included in the test-retest analyses due to 12 participants being in treatment between T1 and T2.

Results: Subscales from the BMQ-R-NOR and MQ-NOR were significantly positively correlated, indicating evidence of convergent validity (rs = 0.22*-0.74**). The BMQ-R-NOR showed overall good internal consistency (omega = 0.72-0.93; alpha = 0.70-0.93) and satisfactory test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.35-0.92).

Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the BMQ-R-NOR are considered satisfactory. However, it is advised to exercise caution when using it until further comprehensive validation studies are conducted to ensure robustness and reliability in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初步验证挪威版柏林嗜眠症问卷修订版(BMQ-R-NOR)。
目的: 对挪威语版柏林嗜睡症问卷(BMQ-R-NOR)进行心理测量学评估:对挪威版柏林嗜睡症问卷修订版(BMQ-R-NOR)进行心理测量评估:设计:受试者两次完成在线版自我报告问卷BMQ-R-NOR,一次完成MQ-NOR。通过 BMQ-R-NOR 和 MQ-NOR 之间的斯皮尔曼相关性评估了收敛效度。内部一致性用 McDonald's omega 和 Cronbach's alpha 进行评估。研究样本:82 名自述有误咽症的参与者参加了 T1 阶段的研究,其中 53 人参加了 T2 阶段的研究。然而,由于有12名参与者在T1和T2期间接受了治疗,其中只有41名参与者被纳入了测试-重测分析:结果:BMQ-R-NOR和MQ-NOR的子量表呈显著正相关,表明两者具有收敛效度(rs = 0.22*-0.74**)。BMQ-R-NOR显示出总体良好的内部一致性(ω=0.72-0.93;α=0.70-0.93)和令人满意的测试-再测可靠性(ICC=0.35-0.92):结论:BMQ-R-NOR 的心理测量特性令人满意。结论:BMQ-R-NOR 的心理测量学特性令人满意,但在进行进一步的全面验证研究以确保其在临床实践中的稳健性和可靠性之前,建议谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of psychology
Scandinavian journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Published in association with the Nordic psychological associations, the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology publishes original papers from Scandinavia and elsewhere. Covering the whole range of psychology, with a particular focus on experimental psychology, the journal includes high-quality theoretical and methodological papers, empirical reports, reviews and ongoing commentaries.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is organised into four standing subsections: - Cognition and Neurosciences - Development and Aging - Personality and Social Sciences - Health and Disability
期刊最新文献
Co-worker phubbing: A qualitative exploration of smartphone use during work breaks. Core self‐evaluations and perceived classmate support: Independent predictors of psychological adjustment Interpretability and clinical utility of the strength and stressors in parenting questionnaire Sex workers' professional agency, quality of life, and problematic substance use in Finland Not exactly twins: Authoritarians and populists differ in their attitudes toward trust in government, elitism, pluralism, political identification, and identity fusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1