‘Ein Strudel der Selbstauflösung’: The Contested Role of Form in Poetry from the Concentration Camps

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS FORUM FOR MODERN LANGUAGE STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1093/fmls/cqae029
Elizabeth Robinson-Self
{"title":"‘Ein Strudel der Selbstauflösung’: The Contested Role of Form in Poetry from the Concentration Camps","authors":"Elizabeth Robinson-Self","doi":"10.1093/fmls/cqae029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"German-language concentration camp poetry has been frequently criticized for its formal failings, particularly its lack of innovation and overreliance on traditional forms. In this article, I undertake close readings of three formally conventional texts: Alfred Kittner’s ‘Molotschna’ (composed in Obodowka, a Transnistrian extermination camp, in 1943), Fritz Löhner-Beda’s ‘Sonett auf das Revier im KZ-Buchenwald’ (composed in Buchenwald in 1940) and Heinrich Steinitz’s ‘Wo bist Du, Gott?’ (composed in Buchenwald between 1938 and 1942). I will demonstrate how traditional forms provided stability in the midst of extremity through their regularity, structure and link to a more stable past and identity. Moreover, I will propose that they were not simply readily available containers for the poet’s suffering, but also enabled the poet to shape their individual depiction of the camps and therefore provide as valid an insight as those works which respond to extremity with fragmentation and innovation.","PeriodicalId":42991,"journal":{"name":"FORUM FOR MODERN LANGUAGE STUDIES","volume":"2010 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM FOR MODERN LANGUAGE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqae029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

German-language concentration camp poetry has been frequently criticized for its formal failings, particularly its lack of innovation and overreliance on traditional forms. In this article, I undertake close readings of three formally conventional texts: Alfred Kittner’s ‘Molotschna’ (composed in Obodowka, a Transnistrian extermination camp, in 1943), Fritz Löhner-Beda’s ‘Sonett auf das Revier im KZ-Buchenwald’ (composed in Buchenwald in 1940) and Heinrich Steinitz’s ‘Wo bist Du, Gott?’ (composed in Buchenwald between 1938 and 1942). I will demonstrate how traditional forms provided stability in the midst of extremity through their regularity, structure and link to a more stable past and identity. Moreover, I will propose that they were not simply readily available containers for the poet’s suffering, but also enabled the poet to shape their individual depiction of the camps and therefore provide as valid an insight as those works which respond to extremity with fragmentation and innovation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ein Strudel der Selbstauflösung":集中营诗歌中形式的争议性作用
德语集中营诗歌因其形式上的缺陷,尤其是缺乏创新和过度依赖传统形式而屡遭批评。在本文中,我将对三篇形式传统的文本进行细读:阿尔弗雷德-基特纳(Alfred Kittner)的《Molotschna》(1943 年创作于德涅斯特河左岸灭绝营 Obodowka)、弗里茨-洛纳-贝达(Fritz Löhner-Beda)的《Sonett auf das Revier im KZ-Buchenwald》(1940 年创作于布痕瓦尔德)和海因里希-斯坦尼茨(Heinrich Steinitz)的《Wo bist Du, Gott?》(1938 年至 1942 年创作于布痕瓦尔德)。我将展示传统形式如何通过其规律性、结构性以及与更稳定的过去和身份的联系,在极端环境中提供稳定性。此外,我还将提出,它们不仅仅是诗人痛苦的现成容器,还使诗人能够塑造他们对集中营的个人描述,因此,它们与那些以碎片化和创新来应对极端的作品一样,提供了有效的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Since its foundation in 1965, Forum for Modern Language Studies has published articles on all aspects of literary and linguistic studies, from the Middle Ages to the present day. The journal sets out to reflect the essential pluralism of modern language and literature studies and to provide a forum for worldwide scholarly discussion. Each annual volume normally includes two thematic issues.
期刊最新文献
Refugee Memoirs: Kouamé’s Revenu des ténèbres (2018) and Dina Nayeri’s The Ungrateful Refugee (2019) and the challenge of refugee narratives Beauty with an Explanation and the Poetics of Acculturation: How, and Why, Michael Ondaatje’s Poetic Novels Work The Semantics of Beauty in Spanish Adjectives: Conceptual Structure and Implications for Folk Aesthetics ‘Ein Strudel der Selbstauflösung’: The Contested Role of Form in Poetry from the Concentration Camps The Dual Role of Code-Switching in Alejandro Morales’s Reto en el Paraíso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1