Mapping the Common Barriers to Optimal COPD Care in High and Middle-Income Countries: Qualitative Perspectives from Clinicians

Orjola Shahaj, Anne Meiwald, Krishnan Puri Sudhir, Rupert Gara-Adams, Peter Wark, Alexis Cazaux, Abelardo Elizondo Rios, Sergey N Avdeev, Elisabeth J Adams
{"title":"Mapping the Common Barriers to Optimal COPD Care in High and Middle-Income Countries: Qualitative Perspectives from Clinicians","authors":"Orjola Shahaj, Anne Meiwald, Krishnan Puri Sudhir, Rupert Gara-Adams, Peter Wark, Alexis Cazaux, Abelardo Elizondo Rios, Sergey N Avdeev, Elisabeth J Adams","doi":"10.2147/copd.s449659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a significant global health burden despite being largely preventable and treatable. Despite the availability of guidelines, COPD care remains suboptimal in many settings, including high-income countries (HICs) and upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), with varied approaches to diagnosis and management. This study aimed to identify common and unique barriers to COPD care across six countries (Australia, Spain, Taiwan, Argentina, Mexico, and Russia) to inform global policy initiatives for improved care.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> COPD care pathways were mapped for each country and supplemented with epidemiological, health-economic, and clinical data from a targeted literature review. Semi-structured interviews with 17 respiratory care clinicians were used to further validate the pathways and identify key barriers. Thematic content analysis was used to generate the themes.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Six themes were common in most HICs and UMICs: “Challenges in COPD diagnosis”, “Strengthening the role of primary care”, “Fragmented healthcare systems and coordination challenges”, “Inadequate management of COPD exacerbations”, “Limited access to specialized care” and, “Impact of underfinanced and overloaded healthcare systems”. One theme, “Insurance coverage and reimbursement challenges”, was more relevant for UMICs. HICs and UMICs differ in patient and healthcare provider awareness, primary care involvement, spirometry access, and availability of specialized care. Both face issues with healthcare fragmentation, guideline adherence, and COPD exacerbation management. In addition, UMICs also grapple with resource limitations and healthcare infrastructure challenges.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Many challenges to COPD care are the same in both HICs and UMICs, underscoring the pervasive nature of these issues. While country-specific issues require customized solutions, there are untapped possibilities for implementing global respiratory strategies that support countries to manage COPD effectively. In addition to healthcare system-level initiatives, there is a crucial need for political prioritization of COPD to allocate the essential resources it requires.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> COPD, barriers, qualitative research, healthcare systems, global policy<br/>","PeriodicalId":13792,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s449659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a significant global health burden despite being largely preventable and treatable. Despite the availability of guidelines, COPD care remains suboptimal in many settings, including high-income countries (HICs) and upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), with varied approaches to diagnosis and management. This study aimed to identify common and unique barriers to COPD care across six countries (Australia, Spain, Taiwan, Argentina, Mexico, and Russia) to inform global policy initiatives for improved care.
Methods: COPD care pathways were mapped for each country and supplemented with epidemiological, health-economic, and clinical data from a targeted literature review. Semi-structured interviews with 17 respiratory care clinicians were used to further validate the pathways and identify key barriers. Thematic content analysis was used to generate the themes.
Results: Six themes were common in most HICs and UMICs: “Challenges in COPD diagnosis”, “Strengthening the role of primary care”, “Fragmented healthcare systems and coordination challenges”, “Inadequate management of COPD exacerbations”, “Limited access to specialized care” and, “Impact of underfinanced and overloaded healthcare systems”. One theme, “Insurance coverage and reimbursement challenges”, was more relevant for UMICs. HICs and UMICs differ in patient and healthcare provider awareness, primary care involvement, spirometry access, and availability of specialized care. Both face issues with healthcare fragmentation, guideline adherence, and COPD exacerbation management. In addition, UMICs also grapple with resource limitations and healthcare infrastructure challenges.
Conclusion: Many challenges to COPD care are the same in both HICs and UMICs, underscoring the pervasive nature of these issues. While country-specific issues require customized solutions, there are untapped possibilities for implementing global respiratory strategies that support countries to manage COPD effectively. In addition to healthcare system-level initiatives, there is a crucial need for political prioritization of COPD to allocate the essential resources it requires.

Keywords: COPD, barriers, qualitative research, healthcare systems, global policy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制中高收入国家慢性阻塞性肺疾病最佳治疗的常见障碍图:临床医生的定性视角
目的:尽管慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)在很大程度上是可以预防和治疗的,但它却给全球健康带来了沉重的负担。尽管制定了相关指南,但在包括高收入国家(HICs)和中上收入国家(UMICs)在内的许多环境中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病的治疗仍未达到最佳水平,诊断和管理方法也各不相同。本研究旨在确定六个国家(澳大利亚、西班牙、台湾、阿根廷、墨西哥和俄罗斯)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理方面的共同障碍和独特障碍,为改善护理的全球政策倡议提供信息:方法:为每个国家绘制了慢性阻塞性肺病护理路径图,并通过有针对性的文献综述补充了流行病学、健康经济学和临床数据。对 17 名呼吸护理临床医生进行了半结构式访谈,以进一步验证护理路径并确定关键障碍。采用主题内容分析法生成主题:结果:在大多数高收入国家和低收入国家中,有六个主题是共同的:"慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断方面的挑战"、"加强初级保健的作用"、"分散的医疗保健系统和协调方面的挑战"、"对慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化的管理不足"、"获得专业护理的机会有限 "以及 "资金不足和医疗保健系统负担过重的影响"。有一个主题 "保险覆盖面和报销挑战 "与地中海岛屿国家更为相关。高收入国家和低收入国家在患者和医疗服务提供者的意识、初级医疗服务的参与、肺活量测定的可及性以及专业医疗服务的可及性方面存在差异。两者都面临着医疗保健分散、指南遵循和慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化管理等问题。此外,UMICs 还面临着资源限制和医疗基础设施的挑战:结论:慢性阻塞性肺病治疗面临的许多挑战在高收入国家和超低收入国家都是一样的,这凸显了这些问题的普遍性。虽然各国的具体问题需要因地制宜的解决方案,但实施全球呼吸系统战略以支持各国有效管理慢性阻塞性肺病的可能性仍有待开发。除了医疗保健系统层面的举措外,还亟需在政治上优先考虑慢性阻塞性肺病,以分配其所需的基本资源:慢性阻塞性肺病、障碍、定性研究、医疗保健系统、全球政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
期刊最新文献
A Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus on Assessing and Managing Cardiopulmonary Risk in Patients with COPD A Network Meta-Analysis of Aerobic, Resistance, Endurance, and High-Intensity Interval Training to Prioritize Exercise for Stable COPD Association Between Systolic Blood Pressure and in-Hospital Mortality Among Congestive Heart Failure Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study The Relationship Between Benefit Finding and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Mediating Effects of Self-Management Exploring Gender Differences in the Association Between TyG Index and COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study from NHANES 1999-2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1