Reduced protein levels in latex gloves may play an alternative approach to lowering latex sensitization risks among health workers; a cross-sectional analytical study.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1186/s12995-024-00420-x
Chatpong Ngamchokwathana, Naesinee Chaiear, Jitladda Sakdapipanich, Sumalai Dechyotin, Somsamai Sripramai, Prapassorn Khajornpipat
{"title":"Reduced protein levels in latex gloves may play an alternative approach to lowering latex sensitization risks among health workers; a cross-sectional analytical study.","authors":"Chatpong Ngamchokwathana, Naesinee Chaiear, Jitladda Sakdapipanich, Sumalai Dechyotin, Somsamai Sripramai, Prapassorn Khajornpipat","doi":"10.1186/s12995-024-00420-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latex gloves are essential for protecting healthcare workers from biological hazards but pose a risk of latex allergy, particularly due to powdered, protein, and allergen content. Recent advancements in latex glove manufacturing have led to reduced levels of extractable proteins, a known factor triggering allergenic reaction. This study aimed to compare latex sensitization between nursing staff using low-protein and high-protein latex gloves at a tertiary university hospital in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical study categorized participants into two groups based on glove exposure: the low extractable protein group (only exposed to non-powdered latex gloves with extractable protein levels below 50 µg/g) and the high extractable protein group (exposed to powdered latex gloves with levels above 50 µg/g). The sample size comprised 163 individuals in the low protein group and 318 in the high protein group (1:2). Latex allergy symptoms and sensitization were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire and latex-specific IgE measurement (ImmunoCAP), respectively. Data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics, including odds ratios and 95%CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic data was mostly similar in both exposure groups except for age. No significant differences in latex sensitization between the low and high protein groups were found via latex-specific IgE measurement (crude OR 1.90, 95%CI: 0.5, 7.18), potentially attributed to lower extractable protein levels in powdered latex gloves compared to previous studies. In contrast, the low protein group exhibited significantly fewer current latex allergy symptoms in both bivariate (crude OR 0.24, 95%CI: 0.06, 0.74) and multiple variable analysis (adjusted OR 0.18, 95%CI: 0.04, 0.86). Moreover, there was a significant reduction in latex allergy symptoms among the low protein group, decreasing from 9.8% who reported experiencing symptoms (when powdered latex gloves were used) to 1.2% who still reported current symptoms (OR 0.11, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the importance of using non-powdered and low-protein latex gloves to reduce latex allergy symptoms while emphasizing the need for further investigation into the relationship between extractable protein levels in addition to the attempt of the major allergen removal and latex sensitization amid evolving glove manufacturing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","volume":"19 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11145855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-024-00420-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Latex gloves are essential for protecting healthcare workers from biological hazards but pose a risk of latex allergy, particularly due to powdered, protein, and allergen content. Recent advancements in latex glove manufacturing have led to reduced levels of extractable proteins, a known factor triggering allergenic reaction. This study aimed to compare latex sensitization between nursing staff using low-protein and high-protein latex gloves at a tertiary university hospital in Thailand.

Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study categorized participants into two groups based on glove exposure: the low extractable protein group (only exposed to non-powdered latex gloves with extractable protein levels below 50 µg/g) and the high extractable protein group (exposed to powdered latex gloves with levels above 50 µg/g). The sample size comprised 163 individuals in the low protein group and 318 in the high protein group (1:2). Latex allergy symptoms and sensitization were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire and latex-specific IgE measurement (ImmunoCAP), respectively. Data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics, including odds ratios and 95%CI.

Results: Demographic data was mostly similar in both exposure groups except for age. No significant differences in latex sensitization between the low and high protein groups were found via latex-specific IgE measurement (crude OR 1.90, 95%CI: 0.5, 7.18), potentially attributed to lower extractable protein levels in powdered latex gloves compared to previous studies. In contrast, the low protein group exhibited significantly fewer current latex allergy symptoms in both bivariate (crude OR 0.24, 95%CI: 0.06, 0.74) and multiple variable analysis (adjusted OR 0.18, 95%CI: 0.04, 0.86). Moreover, there was a significant reduction in latex allergy symptoms among the low protein group, decreasing from 9.8% who reported experiencing symptoms (when powdered latex gloves were used) to 1.2% who still reported current symptoms (OR 0.11, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.44).

Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of using non-powdered and low-protein latex gloves to reduce latex allergy symptoms while emphasizing the need for further investigation into the relationship between extractable protein levels in addition to the attempt of the major allergen removal and latex sensitization amid evolving glove manufacturing practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降低乳胶手套中的蛋白质含量可能是降低医务工作者乳胶致敏风险的另一种方法;一项横断面分析研究。
背景:乳胶手套对于保护医护人员免受生物危害至关重要,但也存在乳胶过敏的风险,特别是由于其含有粉末、蛋白质和过敏原。最近,乳胶手套制造技术的进步降低了可萃取蛋白质的含量,而可萃取蛋白质是引发过敏反应的已知因素。本研究旨在比较泰国一所三级大学医院护理人员使用低蛋白乳胶手套和高蛋白乳胶手套的乳胶致敏情况:一项横断面分析研究根据接触手套的情况将参与者分为两组:低可萃取蛋白组(仅接触可萃取蛋白水平低于 50 µg/g 的非粉末乳胶手套)和高可萃取蛋白组(接触可萃取蛋白水平高于 50 µg/g 的粉末乳胶手套)。低蛋白组有 163 人,高蛋白组有 318 人(1:2)。乳胶过敏症状和致敏程度分别通过自制问卷和乳胶特异性 IgE 测量(ImmunoCAP)进行评估。数据分析包括描述性和推论性统计,包括几率比和 95%CI:结果:除年龄外,两组接触者的人口统计学数据基本相似。通过乳胶特异性 IgE 测量发现,低蛋白组和高蛋白组之间的乳胶过敏性没有明显差异(粗略 OR 1.90,95%CI:0.5,7.18),这可能是由于与之前的研究相比,粉末乳胶手套中的可提取蛋白水平较低。相比之下,在双变量分析(粗略 OR 0.24,95%CI:0.06,0.74)和多变量分析(调整 OR 0.18,95%CI:0.04,0.86)中,低蛋白组目前出现的乳胶过敏症状明显较少。此外,低蛋白组的乳胶过敏症状明显减少,从9.8%的症状报告者(使用粉末状乳胶手套时)减少到1.2%的症状报告者(OR 0.11,95%CI:0.02,0.44):这项研究强调了使用非粉末和低蛋白乳胶手套来减少乳胶过敏症状的重要性,同时也强调了在手套生产实践不断发展的情况下,除了尝试去除主要过敏原外,还需要进一步研究可提取蛋白水平与乳胶过敏之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Aimed at clinicians and researchers, the Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology is a multi-disciplinary, open access journal which publishes original research on the clinical and scientific aspects of occupational and environmental health. With high-quality peer review and quick decision times, we welcome submissions on the diagnosis, prevention, management, and scientific analysis of occupational diseases, injuries, and disability. The journal also covers the promotion of health of workers, their families, and communities, and ranges from rehabilitation to tropical medicine and public health aspects.
期刊最新文献
Principles of occupational medicine: an educational case study of hazards and risks for Dr "Indiana" Jones. Silicosis prevalence and related issues in India: a scoping review. Relationship between butyrylcholinesterase activity and hepatic transaminases: a cross-sectional study in agricultural workers from Peru. Impacts of hazardous noise levels on hearing loss and tinnitus in dental professionals. Sowing seeds of awareness: a cross-sectional analysis of mental health literacy and help-seeking in Irish farmers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1