Deinstitutionalization as a way of corrosion of the state's claim to a monopoly on legitimate violence: an approach based on Pierre Bourdieu, François Dubet and Danilo Martuccelli

Orlando Villas Bôas Filho
{"title":"Deinstitutionalization as a way of corrosion of the state's claim to a monopoly on legitimate violence: an approach based on Pierre Bourdieu, François Dubet and Danilo Martuccelli","authors":"Orlando Villas Bôas Filho","doi":"10.1590/2179-8966/2023/66158i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to discuss the impact of deinstitutionalization on the state's claim to a monopoly of legitimate physical and symbolic violence. Thus, in the first place, starting with a concise approach to the concepts of field, capital, and habitus, it presents, without pretension to a critical distancing (which would be incompatible with its dimensions and purposes), the general aspects of Pierre Bourdieu's reflection about the State. For this purpose, it then examines the thesis proposed by the author about the State as an institution responsible for the (re)production and canonization of forms of social classification. After this examination, it focuses on fundamental aspects of the analysis undertaken by François Dubet and Danilo Martuccelli about the process of deinstitutionalization to indicate some of its effects on the State.","PeriodicalId":515385,"journal":{"name":"Revista Direito e Práxis","volume":"2 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Direito e Práxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2023/66158i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to discuss the impact of deinstitutionalization on the state's claim to a monopoly of legitimate physical and symbolic violence. Thus, in the first place, starting with a concise approach to the concepts of field, capital, and habitus, it presents, without pretension to a critical distancing (which would be incompatible with its dimensions and purposes), the general aspects of Pierre Bourdieu's reflection about the State. For this purpose, it then examines the thesis proposed by the author about the State as an institution responsible for the (re)production and canonization of forms of social classification. After this examination, it focuses on fundamental aspects of the analysis undertaken by François Dubet and Danilo Martuccelli about the process of deinstitutionalization to indicate some of its effects on the State.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非制度化作为腐蚀国家对合法暴力垄断的一种方式:基于皮埃尔-布迪厄、弗朗索瓦-杜贝和达尼洛-马图切利的方法
摘要 本文旨在讨论非制度化对国家声称垄断合法的身体和象征性暴力的影响。因此,首先,文章从简明扼要的领域、资本和习性概念入手,介绍了皮埃尔-布尔迪厄对国家的总体思考,但并不刻意追求批判的距离感(这不符合文章的范围和目的)。为此,该书接着探讨了作者提出的关于国家是负责(重新)生产和规范社会分类形式的机构的论点。在这一研究之后,本报告将重点放在弗朗索瓦-杜贝(François Dubet)和达尼洛-马图切利(Danilo Martuccelli)对非制度化进程进行的分析的基本方面,以说明其对国家的一些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A construção da sociedade neoliberal brasileira: qual o lugar da democracia? “Ainda dói tudo na minha memória”: a urgência do campo dos Direitos Raciais para o alvorecer da contracolonização Deinstitutionalization as a way of corrosion of the state's claim to a monopoly on legitimate violence: an approach based on Pierre Bourdieu, François Dubet and Danilo Martuccelli Os Estados Ibéricos e a Questão da Transição em Portugal How gender and race structure the prison system: dialogues with Angela Davis about racism and sexism in Brazilian punitive control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1