“The more we share, the more we have”? Analyses of knowledge sharing by key account managers

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Industrial Marketing Management Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.04.006
Leonore D.K. Peters
{"title":"“The more we share, the more we have”? Analyses of knowledge sharing by key account managers","authors":"Leonore D.K. Peters","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Knowledge, as one of the most important resources, has a strong impact on inter-organizational relationships, particularly in key account (KA) relationships where knowledge sharing is essential. Previous research has shown that customer-specific knowledge is often tied to the respective KA manager and that knowledge sharing is especially complex, which raises the challenge of how to foster knowledge sharing to increase KA performance. However, the current state of research lacks an integrative perspective that considers both organizational and individual factors as relevant for knowledge sharing and KA performance. The research approach is twofold: First, a qualitative study based on 88 semi-structured interviews investigates the role of organizational factors and the individuals' role in knowledge sharing. Second, a quantitative moderated mediation analysis reinforces these associations using survey data from 307 respondents. The results show that identification with the company positively influences knowledge sharing behavior and that high knowledge sharing behavior has a positive influence on KA performance, which is moderated by the degree of formalization. The results of the analyses contribute to the research of KA management and knowledge management and provide new insights by focusing on both, organizational and individual factors and by applying assumptions from social identity theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"120 ","pages":"Pages 100-114"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850124000622/pdfft?md5=1b081812fea102f1db8435b0cdbdaa33&pid=1-s2.0-S0019850124000622-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850124000622","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge, as one of the most important resources, has a strong impact on inter-organizational relationships, particularly in key account (KA) relationships where knowledge sharing is essential. Previous research has shown that customer-specific knowledge is often tied to the respective KA manager and that knowledge sharing is especially complex, which raises the challenge of how to foster knowledge sharing to increase KA performance. However, the current state of research lacks an integrative perspective that considers both organizational and individual factors as relevant for knowledge sharing and KA performance. The research approach is twofold: First, a qualitative study based on 88 semi-structured interviews investigates the role of organizational factors and the individuals' role in knowledge sharing. Second, a quantitative moderated mediation analysis reinforces these associations using survey data from 307 respondents. The results show that identification with the company positively influences knowledge sharing behavior and that high knowledge sharing behavior has a positive influence on KA performance, which is moderated by the degree of formalization. The results of the analyses contribute to the research of KA management and knowledge management and provide new insights by focusing on both, organizational and individual factors and by applying assumptions from social identity theory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"分享越多,拥有越多"?大客户经理的知识共享分析
知识作为最重要的资源之一,对组织间关系有很大影响,特别是在关键客户(KA)关系中,知识共享至关重要。以往的研究表明,特定客户的知识往往与各自的 KA 经理息息相关,而且知识共享尤其复杂,这就提出了如何促进知识共享以提高 KA 业绩的挑战。然而,目前的研究缺乏一种综合视角,即同时考虑与知识共享和 KA 绩效相关的组织和个人因素。研究方法有两个方面:首先,基于 88 个半结构式访谈的定性研究调查了组织因素和个人在知识共享中的作用。其次,通过对 307 名受访者的调查数据进行定量调节中介分析,加强这些关联。结果表明,对公司的认同会对知识共享行为产生积极影响,高知识共享行为会对知识共享绩效产生积极影响,而这种影响会受到正规化程度的调节。分析结果有助于知识共享管理和知识管理的研究,并通过关注组织和个人因素以及应用社会认同理论的假设提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic capabilities behind performance of exporting firms: Taxonomy, critique, future research directions Employing big data capability in the face of fierce competition: Exploring the synergy between market orientation, marketing strategies, and innovation capabilities Editorial Board Let's be emotional! Experimental evidence for an alternative mediation logic of emotions in business relationships Entrepreneurial selling: Advancing value-based sales through entrepreneurial psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1