Lessons learned: Using a Three-Step Model of Planned Change for nursing curricular revision

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Professional Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.05.009
Theresa Adelman-Mullally , Sandy Nielsen , Carolina Posada Ford , Kim Astroth , Seon Yoon Chung
{"title":"Lessons learned: Using a Three-Step Model of Planned Change for nursing curricular revision","authors":"Theresa Adelman-Mullally ,&nbsp;Sandy Nielsen ,&nbsp;Carolina Posada Ford ,&nbsp;Kim Astroth ,&nbsp;Seon Yoon Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2021) introduced “The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education” (Essentials) in 2021. The AACN document necessitated a change in nursing curriculums, both undergraduate and graduate. To meet the revised standards, one college of nursing within a hierarchical organization used a Three-Step Model of Planned Change to guide curricular revisions. This article presents the lessons learned from using the Three-Step Model of Planned Change, which includes barriers, strategies, and a toolkit for implementing planned change.</p></div><div><h3>Step One-Desire a Change</h3><p>Lessons learned include embracing the unifying values of the guiding coalition to understand the motivation(s) and urgency for change. Suggested strategies include creating a cross-sectional organizational team, utilizing collaborative approaches that value members' time, and various communication methods.</p></div><div><h3>Step Two-Make the Change</h3><p>Lessons learned include understanding the larger hierarchical structure's process requirements and time allotment for approval. Suggested strategies include establishing a repository hub for templates and shared documents, implementing various communication channels, and repurposing standing meeting times.</p></div><div><h3>Step Three-Live the Change</h3><p>As this process is just beginning, anticipated lessons include an understanding of changes occurring circuitously within and between steps. Considerations include significant and purposeful actions to deliver the new curriculum.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 140-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324000796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2021) introduced “The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education” (Essentials) in 2021. The AACN document necessitated a change in nursing curriculums, both undergraduate and graduate. To meet the revised standards, one college of nursing within a hierarchical organization used a Three-Step Model of Planned Change to guide curricular revisions. This article presents the lessons learned from using the Three-Step Model of Planned Change, which includes barriers, strategies, and a toolkit for implementing planned change.

Step One-Desire a Change

Lessons learned include embracing the unifying values of the guiding coalition to understand the motivation(s) and urgency for change. Suggested strategies include creating a cross-sectional organizational team, utilizing collaborative approaches that value members' time, and various communication methods.

Step Two-Make the Change

Lessons learned include understanding the larger hierarchical structure's process requirements and time allotment for approval. Suggested strategies include establishing a repository hub for templates and shared documents, implementing various communication channels, and repurposing standing meeting times.

Step Three-Live the Change

As this process is just beginning, anticipated lessons include an understanding of changes occurring circuitously within and between steps. Considerations include significant and purposeful actions to deliver the new curriculum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经验教训:在护理课程修订中使用计划变革三步模型
背景美国护理学院协会(AACN,2021 年)于 2021 年推出了 "要点:专业护理教育的核心能力"(Essentials)。根据 AACN 的文件,有必要对本科和研究生的护理课程进行改革。为了达到修订后的标准,一个分级组织内的护理学院采用了 "计划变革三步模型"(Three-Step Model of Planned Change)来指导课程修订。本文介绍了使用计划变革三步模型的经验教训,包括实施计划变革的障碍、策略和工具包。"第一步--渴望变革 "的经验教训包括接受指导联盟的统一价值观,以了解变革的动机和紧迫性。建议采取的策略包括创建一个跨部门的组织团队、利用重视成员时间的协作方法以及各种沟通方法。第二步--进行变革吸取的经验教训包括了解更大的层级结构的流程要求和审批时间分配。建议采取的策略包括建立模板和共享文件的存储中心、实施各种沟通渠道以及重新安排常设会议时间。第三步--实现变革由于这一过程刚刚开始,预期的经验教训包括了解在步骤内部和步骤之间发生的迂回变化。考虑因素包括为实施新课程而采取的重要而有目的的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
期刊最新文献
A blueprint for integrating nursing history: Performance indicators for competency-based education Nursing students' personality traits, sleep quality, social media addiction, and academic performance: A multi-site structural equation model analysis Weaving Caring Science into the AACN Essentials: A cross-impact analysis and resource guide Comparing characteristics of underrepresented versus majority student groups enrolled in US nursing programs Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1