Development and Validation of the Five-Factor Borderline Inventory-Super Short Form and Screener.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Assessment Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1177/10731911241256439
Hilary L DeShong, Courtney K Mason, Ben Porter, Kren Kelley, Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt, Donald R Lynam, Joshua D Miller, Thomas Widiger
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Five-Factor Borderline Inventory-Super Short Form and Screener.","authors":"Hilary L DeShong, Courtney K Mason, Ben Porter, Kren Kelley, Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt, Donald R Lynam, Joshua D Miller, Thomas Widiger","doi":"10.1177/10731911241256439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Five-Factor Borderline Inventory (FFBI) and FFBI-Short Form (FFBI-SF) are 120-item and 48-item measures that assess the underlying maladaptive personality traits of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The purpose of this study was to develop a super short form (FFBI-SSF) and an FFBI-Screener to facilitate the use of dimensional trait measures for BPD. Using item response theory analyses, the 48-item measure was reduced to 22 items using a large undergraduate sample (<i>N</i> = 1300) and then retested using a Mechanical Turk sample (<i>N</i> = 602), demonstrating strong replicability. IRT was again used to further reduce the measure from 22 items to four items to provide a brief screening tool. Correlations of the FFBI-SSF and Screener with measures of BPD-related variables were compared across five samples (<i>N</i> = 919, 204, 580, 281, and 488). Overall, the FFBI-SSF showed similar relations to the FFBI-SF at the full scale and domain-level scales, while the FFBI-screener demonstrated similar relations at the full scale level. This super short form and screener may best be used in large-scale research studies or as part of a screening tool in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"488-500"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241256439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Five-Factor Borderline Inventory (FFBI) and FFBI-Short Form (FFBI-SF) are 120-item and 48-item measures that assess the underlying maladaptive personality traits of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The purpose of this study was to develop a super short form (FFBI-SSF) and an FFBI-Screener to facilitate the use of dimensional trait measures for BPD. Using item response theory analyses, the 48-item measure was reduced to 22 items using a large undergraduate sample (N = 1300) and then retested using a Mechanical Turk sample (N = 602), demonstrating strong replicability. IRT was again used to further reduce the measure from 22 items to four items to provide a brief screening tool. Correlations of the FFBI-SSF and Screener with measures of BPD-related variables were compared across five samples (N = 919, 204, 580, 281, and 488). Overall, the FFBI-SSF showed similar relations to the FFBI-SF at the full scale and domain-level scales, while the FFBI-screener demonstrated similar relations at the full scale level. This super short form and screener may best be used in large-scale research studies or as part of a screening tool in clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边际障碍五因素量表--超级简表和筛选器的开发与验证。
边缘型人格障碍五因素量表(FFBI)和FFBI简表(FFBI-SF)分别由120个和48个项目组成,用于评估边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的潜在适应不良人格特质。本研究的目的是开发一种超级简表(FFBI-SSF)和一种 FFBI 筛选器,以方便使用针对 BPD 的维度特质测量。通过项目反应理论分析,使用大量本科生样本(N = 1300)将 48 个项目的测量结果缩减为 22 个项目,然后使用 Mechanical Turk 样本(N = 602)进行了重新测试,结果表明具有很强的可复制性。我们再次使用 IRT 将测量项目从 22 个进一步缩减为 4 个,以提供一个简短的筛查工具。在五个样本(N = 919、204、580、281 和 488)中比较了 FFBI-SSF 和筛选器与 BPD 相关变量测量的相关性。总体而言,FFBI-SSF 与 FFBI-SF 在全量表和领域水平量表上表现出相似的关系,而 FFBI 筛选器在全量表水平上表现出相似的关系。这种超级简表和筛选器最适合用于大规模研究或作为临床筛查工具的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
"Why Bother? There's Always Another Question": Shortening Bandura's Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Scale. In the Beast Mode: Predator Self-Identifications as a Model of Disagreeable Functioning. Validation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale in a Sample of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Adults. Testing a Multidimensional Factor Structure of the Self-Control Scale. Cross-National Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index Within Adolescent Populations: Findings From 43 Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1