Participation in staff engagement campaigns at large healthcare organisations: a focus group study.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Leader Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1136/leader-2023-000915
Richard James, Jenny Lewis, Laura Stroud
{"title":"Participation in staff engagement campaigns at large healthcare organisations: a focus group study.","authors":"Richard James, Jenny Lewis, Laura Stroud","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare organisations work better with an engaged workforce, and staff-engagement campaigns offer a method to build this engagement. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (LTHT), one of the UK's largest Trusts, provides an example of where an organisation-wide engagement intervention has been used in a healthcare setting. This study aimed to understand why staff participate, or do not participate, in staff-engagement campaigns, supporting healthcare leaders to increase participation in future campaigns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scenario-based focus groups were carried out across five different organisational units within LTHT. The data from these were transcribed, coded and analysed using reflective thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participation in staff-engagement campaigns is dependent on campaign awareness, staff perceptions of the campaign and the practicalities associated with participation. Perceptions of the campaign are further subdivided into the campaign's perceived effectiveness, purpose and relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Staff engagement was a powerful driver of participation, which presents a conundrum: how do you encourage participation in staff-engagement campaigns, if engagement is a prerequisite for participation? The answer lies in taking advantage of organisational belongingness and visible leadership, supported by communications that take control of the narrative around the campaign. Behavioural science models may guide leaders across the organisation in mapping where these approaches can have the greatest impact within their existing spheres of influence. Further, considering inequalities around participation across different groups may help target action to the areas of greatest need. Accordingly, the research provides pragmatic guidance for leaders in thinking about how to use staff-engagement campaigns more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare organisations work better with an engaged workforce, and staff-engagement campaigns offer a method to build this engagement. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (LTHT), one of the UK's largest Trusts, provides an example of where an organisation-wide engagement intervention has been used in a healthcare setting. This study aimed to understand why staff participate, or do not participate, in staff-engagement campaigns, supporting healthcare leaders to increase participation in future campaigns.

Methods: Scenario-based focus groups were carried out across five different organisational units within LTHT. The data from these were transcribed, coded and analysed using reflective thematic analysis.

Results: Participation in staff-engagement campaigns is dependent on campaign awareness, staff perceptions of the campaign and the practicalities associated with participation. Perceptions of the campaign are further subdivided into the campaign's perceived effectiveness, purpose and relevance.

Conclusions: Staff engagement was a powerful driver of participation, which presents a conundrum: how do you encourage participation in staff-engagement campaigns, if engagement is a prerequisite for participation? The answer lies in taking advantage of organisational belongingness and visible leadership, supported by communications that take control of the narrative around the campaign. Behavioural science models may guide leaders across the organisation in mapping where these approaches can have the greatest impact within their existing spheres of influence. Further, considering inequalities around participation across different groups may help target action to the areas of greatest need. Accordingly, the research provides pragmatic guidance for leaders in thinking about how to use staff-engagement campaigns more effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型医疗机构员工参与活动的情况:焦点小组研究。
导言:员工的参与能让医疗机构更好地开展工作,而员工参与活动则是建立员工参与的一种方法。利兹教学医院 NHS 信托基金会(Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust,简称 LTHT)是英国最大的信托基金会之一,它提供了一个在医疗机构中使用全组织参与干预的范例。本研究旨在了解员工参与或不参与员工参与活动的原因,从而支持医疗保健领导者提高员工对未来活动的参与度:方法:在长春泰达医院的五个不同组织单位开展了基于情景的焦点小组。采用反思性主题分析法对这些数据进行转录、编码和分析:参与员工参与活动取决于对活动的认识、员工对活动的看法以及与参与活动相关的实际情况。对活动的看法又可细分为对活动有效性、目的性和相关性的看法:员工参与是推动参与的强大动力,这就提出了一个难题:如果参与是员工参与运动的先决条件,那么如何鼓励员工参与运动?答案就在于利用组织的归属感和明显的领导力,并辅之以控制活动叙事的传播手段。行为科学模型可以指导整个组织的领导者在其现有的影响范围内确定这些方法能够产生最大影响的地方。此外,考虑到不同群体在参与方面的不平等,可能有助于将行动瞄准需求最大的领域。因此,这项研究为领导者思考如何更有效地利用员工参与活动提供了务实的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Religious identity-based discrimination in the physician workforce: findings from a survey of Muslim physicians in the UK. Ten years on: The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS. Gender disparity in Canadian Institutes of Health Research funding within neurology. Impact of department chair gender on paid parental leave across American anaesthesiology residencies. 'Can you have it all?' Exploring perceived gender roles in leadership through the lens of the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer's clinical fellows 2023/24.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1