Enhanced perioperative communication elevates patients’ understanding, perception, and satisfaction for anesthesia services: Insights from a survey study

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_104_24
Rishabh Jaju, Saurabh Varshney, Pooja Bihani, Naveen Paliwal, H. M. R. Karim, Dipak Bhuyan
{"title":"Enhanced perioperative communication elevates patients’ understanding, perception, and satisfaction for anesthesia services: Insights from a survey study","authors":"Rishabh Jaju, Saurabh Varshney, Pooja Bihani, Naveen Paliwal, H. M. R. Karim, Dipak Bhuyan","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_104_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Anesthesiologists’ services extend to many critical areas of any healthcare setup. However, there needs to be more understanding among the public regarding their crucial role. Preanesthesia evaluation (PAE) visits can disseminate information about anesthesiologists and services. We aimed to evaluate patient’s knowledge and the impact of interview-based surveys on increasing knowledge about anesthesiologists and anesthesia services.\n \n \n \n It was a single-center, cross-sectional survey involving 550 patients aged 18–65 undergoing elective surgeries. Pre- and postoperative interviewer-assisted questionnaires were administered to assess patients’ baseline knowledge and perception of anesthesia and anesthesiologists. Statistical analysis focused on demographic, educational, and previous anesthesia exposure among subgroups; a P-value <0.05 was considered significant.\n \n \n \n Less than half comprehended anesthesia’s role as a specialist in inducing unconsciousness. 55.3% were unaware of general anesthesia, and 69.6% were unaware of regional anesthesia as a technique. Higher education and previous anesthesia exposure correlated with better awareness with regard to the perioperative role of anesthesiologists and their fields of work (P < 0.05). The postoperative survey indicated good satisfaction with anesthesiologists’ services, which might be attributable to the survey-based interaction.\n \n \n \n A significant need for more understanding regarding anesthesia and anesthesiologists’ roles still prevails. Interview-based effective communication during PAE visits, perioperative period, and shared decision-making (SDM) improves patients’ knowledge, comprehension, and satisfaction.\n","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_104_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anesthesiologists’ services extend to many critical areas of any healthcare setup. However, there needs to be more understanding among the public regarding their crucial role. Preanesthesia evaluation (PAE) visits can disseminate information about anesthesiologists and services. We aimed to evaluate patient’s knowledge and the impact of interview-based surveys on increasing knowledge about anesthesiologists and anesthesia services. It was a single-center, cross-sectional survey involving 550 patients aged 18–65 undergoing elective surgeries. Pre- and postoperative interviewer-assisted questionnaires were administered to assess patients’ baseline knowledge and perception of anesthesia and anesthesiologists. Statistical analysis focused on demographic, educational, and previous anesthesia exposure among subgroups; a P-value <0.05 was considered significant. Less than half comprehended anesthesia’s role as a specialist in inducing unconsciousness. 55.3% were unaware of general anesthesia, and 69.6% were unaware of regional anesthesia as a technique. Higher education and previous anesthesia exposure correlated with better awareness with regard to the perioperative role of anesthesiologists and their fields of work (P < 0.05). The postoperative survey indicated good satisfaction with anesthesiologists’ services, which might be attributable to the survey-based interaction. A significant need for more understanding regarding anesthesia and anesthesiologists’ roles still prevails. Interview-based effective communication during PAE visits, perioperative period, and shared decision-making (SDM) improves patients’ knowledge, comprehension, and satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强围术期沟通可提高患者对麻醉服务的理解、感知和满意度:一项调查研究的启示
麻醉医师的服务涉及任何医疗机构的许多关键领域。然而,公众需要更多地了解他们的关键作用。麻醉前评估(PAE)访问可以传播有关麻醉医师和服务的信息。我们的目的是评估患者对麻醉医师和麻醉服务的了解程度以及访谈式调查对提高患者对麻醉医师和麻醉服务了解程度的影响。 这是一项单中心横断面调查,涉及 550 名年龄在 18-65 岁之间接受择期手术的患者。通过术前和术后由访谈员协助进行的问卷调查来评估患者对麻醉和麻醉医师的基本知识和看法。统计分析的重点是各分组的人口统计学、教育程度和以往的麻醉经历;P 值小于 0.05 即为显著。 只有不到一半的人了解麻醉在诱导昏迷方面的作用。55.3%的人不了解全身麻醉,69.6%的人不了解区域麻醉这种技术。学历越高、以前接触过麻醉的人越了解麻醉师在围手术期的作用及其工作领域(P < 0.05)。术后调查显示,患者对麻醉医生的服务非常满意,这可能与基于调查的互动有关。 对于麻醉和麻醉医师角色的理解仍有很大的需求。在 PAE 访问、围术期和共同决策 (SDM) 期间,基于访谈的有效沟通可提高患者的知识水平、理解能力和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
The trapezius plane block: Extended use in perioperative pain management in nerve transfer surgeries. Intermittent apnoea and manual jet ventilation: A successful anesthetic management for infant with acquired Myer-Cotton class III subglottic stenosis undergoing endoscopic balloon dilatation Challenges in the anesthetic management of a pediatric patient with glottic web – A lesson Effect of bispectral index on intra-operative awareness: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies Incidence of post-dural lumbar puncture headache (PDLPH) in comparison between emergency and elective lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) with 26G Quincke–Babcock cutting-beveled spinal needle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1