Just War as a Theory, Just Peace as a Virtue

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Studies in Christian Ethics Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1177/09539468241257764
L. Cahill
{"title":"Just War as a Theory, Just Peace as a Virtue","authors":"L. Cahill","doi":"10.1177/09539468241257764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pope Francis both grants the right to use armed force in self-defense and regards all war as ‘a defeat for humanity’. This seeming paradox can be explained by the fact that what is a theoretically just use of force (according to the criteria of just war theory) inevitably results in unjust violence when carried out in practice. The undertaking, processes and practices of war are highly susceptible to what Augustine called the libido dominandi. The theory of just war is carried forward in institutions of actual war-making that foster escalation, discourage restraint, and adapt the theory itself to accommodate increasing violence. ‘Just war’ fails to embody the social and institutional virtue of justice. Thus, as Pope Francis exhorts, the Christian ethics of war and peace should prioritize the theory of just peace and the cultivation of peacebuilding dispositions, practices, and institutions. These strategies favor justice, but success is not guaranteed.","PeriodicalId":43593,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Christian Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Christian Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09539468241257764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pope Francis both grants the right to use armed force in self-defense and regards all war as ‘a defeat for humanity’. This seeming paradox can be explained by the fact that what is a theoretically just use of force (according to the criteria of just war theory) inevitably results in unjust violence when carried out in practice. The undertaking, processes and practices of war are highly susceptible to what Augustine called the libido dominandi. The theory of just war is carried forward in institutions of actual war-making that foster escalation, discourage restraint, and adapt the theory itself to accommodate increasing violence. ‘Just war’ fails to embody the social and institutional virtue of justice. Thus, as Pope Francis exhorts, the Christian ethics of war and peace should prioritize the theory of just peace and the cultivation of peacebuilding dispositions, practices, and institutions. These strategies favor justice, but success is not guaranteed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正义战争是一种理论,正义和平是一种美德
教皇方济各既承认自卫时使用武力的权利,又认为所有战争都是 "人类的失败"。这种看似矛盾的解释是,理论上正义的武力使用(根据正义战争理论的标准)在实践中不可避免地会导致不正义的暴力。战争的事业、过程和实践极易受到奥古斯丁所谓的支配欲的影响。正义战争的理论在实际的战争体制中得以发扬光大,这种体制助长战争升级,阻碍克制,并使理论本身适应日益增长的暴力。正义战争 "未能体现正义的社会和制度美德。因此,正如教皇方济各所劝诫的那样,基督教的战争与和平伦理应优先考虑公正和平的理论以及培养建设和平的态度、实践和制度。这些战略有利于正义,但并不能保证成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
Being with Others and the Practice of Theodicy Book Review: Discipleship and Unity: Bonhoeffer’s Ecumenical Theology by Cole Jodon Book Review: Test All Things: The Bible, Faith, and Science by Gijsbert van den Brink Book Review: The Logic of Love: Christian Ethics and Moral Psychology by Andrew Cameron Book Review: Lying and Truthfulness: A Thomistic Perspective by Stewart Clem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1