Accuracy of the integrated electronic apex locator in locating simulated perforation under various irrigating solutions in an in vitro study

Chintan Joshi, Surabhi Joshi, Urooj Desai, Sweety Thumar, Aashray Patel, Ankita Khunt
{"title":"Accuracy of the integrated electronic apex locator in locating simulated perforation under various irrigating solutions in an in vitro study","authors":"Chintan Joshi, Surabhi Joshi, Urooj Desai, Sweety Thumar, Aashray Patel, Ankita Khunt","doi":"10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8671118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study’s objective was to assess the accuracy of the integrated apex locator in identifying artificial root canal perforations in the presence of saline, chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite, QMix, and MTAD. Methods: The root canals of 60 single-rooted extracted human teeth were perforated artificially at a point 10 mm away from the root apex. After measuring the actual lengths up to the perforation point, the teeth were then put within an alginate mould for measurements using an integrated apex locator. Using a #20 K-file in the presence of NaCl, CHX, MTAD, NaOCl, and QMix, an electronic apex locator was used to measure the perforations electronically in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Between the measurements, each canal was dried with paper points after being irrigated with distilled water. The accuracy of all the readings was calculated at ± 0.5 mm. Statistical analyses were performed using the Z-test. Results: In comparison to the MTAD, NaOCl, and Qmix, saline and chlorhexidine scored more readings in the ± 0.5 mm range of the perforation site, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The most precise electronic measurements of artificial perforation were obtained in the presence of chlorhexidine or saline.","PeriodicalId":504767,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8671118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study’s objective was to assess the accuracy of the integrated apex locator in identifying artificial root canal perforations in the presence of saline, chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite, QMix, and MTAD. Methods: The root canals of 60 single-rooted extracted human teeth were perforated artificially at a point 10 mm away from the root apex. After measuring the actual lengths up to the perforation point, the teeth were then put within an alginate mould for measurements using an integrated apex locator. Using a #20 K-file in the presence of NaCl, CHX, MTAD, NaOCl, and QMix, an electronic apex locator was used to measure the perforations electronically in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Between the measurements, each canal was dried with paper points after being irrigated with distilled water. The accuracy of all the readings was calculated at ± 0.5 mm. Statistical analyses were performed using the Z-test. Results: In comparison to the MTAD, NaOCl, and Qmix, saline and chlorhexidine scored more readings in the ± 0.5 mm range of the perforation site, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The most precise electronic measurements of artificial perforation were obtained in the presence of chlorhexidine or saline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项体外研究中,综合电子牙尖定位仪在各种灌洗溶液下定位模拟穿孔的准确性
目的:本研究旨在评估综合根尖定位仪在生理盐水、洗必泰、次氯酸钠、QMix 和 MTAD 存在的情况下识别人工根管穿孔的准确性。方法:在距根尖 10 毫米处对 60 颗单根拔牙的根管进行人工穿孔。测量穿孔点的实际长度后,将牙齿放入藻酸盐模型中,使用综合根尖定位仪进行测量。在 NaCl、CHX、MTAD、NaOCl 和 QMix 的作用下,使用 20 号 K 锉,按照制造商的说明,使用电子根尖定位仪对穿孔进行电子测量。在两次测量之间,用蒸馏水冲洗每个牙管后,用纸点擦干。所有读数的精确度计算为 ± 0.5 毫米。统计分析采用 Z 检验。结果:与 MTAD、NaOCl 和 Qmix 相比,生理盐水和洗必泰在穿孔部位 ± 0.5 毫米范围内的读数更多,差异具有统计学意义。结论在使用洗必泰或生理盐水的情况下,人工穿孔的电子测量结果最为精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of change in knowledge, attitude, and practice of medical students towards early childhood oral health following educational intervention Knowledge and conduct of dental students about mouthwash prior to dental procedures amid the COVID-19 pandemic Risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws in menopausal women Accuracy of the integrated electronic apex locator in locating simulated perforation under various irrigating solutions in an in vitro study Histomorphometric comparison of two different preclinical models to evaluate the bone repair in grafted areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1