Leachate treatment via electrocoagulation-coal-based powdered activated carbon process: Efficiencies, mechanisms, kinetics, and costs.

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Water Environment Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1002/wer.11060
Aysenur Ogedey, Ensar Oguz
{"title":"Leachate treatment via electrocoagulation-coal-based powdered activated carbon process: Efficiencies, mechanisms, kinetics, and costs.","authors":"Aysenur Ogedey, Ensar Oguz","doi":"10.1002/wer.11060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to improve COD, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, and turbidity removal from Bingöl's leachate using a single-reactor integrated electrocoagulation (EC)-coal-based powdered activated carbon (CBPAC) process under various experimental conditions. In the EC-CBPAC process, three stainless-steel cathodes and three aluminum electrodes were connected to the negative and positive terminals of the power supply, respectively. The initial concentrations in the leachate were 1044 mg O<sub>2</sub>/L for COD, 204 mg/L for NH<sub>3</sub>-N, and 57 NTU (or 71.25-mg (NH<sub>2</sub>)2H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>/L) for turbidity, respectively. After a 40-min EC-CBPAC process, with a CBPAC dosage of 5 g/L and pH of 5 for COD and turbidity, and 9.5 for NH<sub>3</sub>-N, the optimum removal efficiencies for COD, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, and turbidity were achieved at 92%, 40%, and 91%, respectively. When the EC process was applied without CBPAC under the same experimental conditions, the removal efficiencies of COD, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, and turbidity were 87%, 28%, and 54%, respectively. Before and after the EC-CBPAC process, the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume, and mean pore diameter of the CBPAC were found to be (888 m<sup>2</sup>/g, 0.498 cm<sup>3</sup>/g, and 22.28 Å) and (173 m<sup>2</sup>/g, 0.18 cm<sup>3</sup>/g, and 42.8 Å), respectively. The optimum pseudo-first-order (PFO) rate constants for COD, turbidity, and NH<sub>3</sub>-N were determined to be 3.15 × 10<sup>-2</sup>, 4.77 × 10<sup>-2</sup>, and 8.8 × 10<sup>-3</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. With the current density increasing from 15 to 25 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, energy consumption, unit energy consumption, and total cost increased from 68.7 to 122.4 kWh/m<sup>3</sup>, 6.948 to 15.226 kWh/kg COD, and 0.85 to 1.838 $/kg COD, respectively. PRACTITIONER POINTS: EC-CBPAC process has greater COD, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, and turbidity removal efficiency than EC process. COD and turbidity achieved their optimum disposal efficiencies at 92% and 91%, respectively, at pH 5 The most efficient disposal efficiency for NH<sub>3</sub>-N was observed to be 40% at pH 9.5. EC-CBPAC process increased removal efficiencies for COD, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, and turbidity by 20%, 19%, and 38%, respectively, compared with EC alone. The turbidity, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, and COD disposal fitted PSO model due to high correlation values (R<sup>2</sup> 0.94-0.99).</p>","PeriodicalId":23621,"journal":{"name":"Water Environment Research","volume":"96 6","pages":"e11060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Environment Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.11060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to improve COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal from Bingöl's leachate using a single-reactor integrated electrocoagulation (EC)-coal-based powdered activated carbon (CBPAC) process under various experimental conditions. In the EC-CBPAC process, three stainless-steel cathodes and three aluminum electrodes were connected to the negative and positive terminals of the power supply, respectively. The initial concentrations in the leachate were 1044 mg O2/L for COD, 204 mg/L for NH3-N, and 57 NTU (or 71.25-mg (NH2)2H2SO4/L) for turbidity, respectively. After a 40-min EC-CBPAC process, with a CBPAC dosage of 5 g/L and pH of 5 for COD and turbidity, and 9.5 for NH3-N, the optimum removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were achieved at 92%, 40%, and 91%, respectively. When the EC process was applied without CBPAC under the same experimental conditions, the removal efficiencies of COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were 87%, 28%, and 54%, respectively. Before and after the EC-CBPAC process, the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume, and mean pore diameter of the CBPAC were found to be (888 m2/g, 0.498 cm3/g, and 22.28 Å) and (173 m2/g, 0.18 cm3/g, and 42.8 Å), respectively. The optimum pseudo-first-order (PFO) rate constants for COD, turbidity, and NH3-N were determined to be 3.15 × 10-2, 4.77 × 10-2, and 8.8 × 10-3 min-1, respectively. With the current density increasing from 15 to 25 mA/cm2, energy consumption, unit energy consumption, and total cost increased from 68.7 to 122.4 kWh/m3, 6.948 to 15.226 kWh/kg COD, and 0.85 to 1.838 $/kg COD, respectively. PRACTITIONER POINTS: EC-CBPAC process has greater COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal efficiency than EC process. COD and turbidity achieved their optimum disposal efficiencies at 92% and 91%, respectively, at pH 5 The most efficient disposal efficiency for NH3-N was observed to be 40% at pH 9.5. EC-CBPAC process increased removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity by 20%, 19%, and 38%, respectively, compared with EC alone. The turbidity, NH3-N, and COD disposal fitted PSO model due to high correlation values (R2 0.94-0.99).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过电凝-煤基粉末活性炭工艺处理渗滤液:效率、机制、动力学和成本。
本研究旨在利用单反应器集成电凝(EC)-炭基粉末活性炭(CBPAC)工艺,在各种实验条件下提高宾格尔垃圾渗滤液中 COD、NH3-N 和浊度的去除率。在 EC-CBPAC 工艺中,电源的正负极分别连接了三个不锈钢阴极和三个铝电极。渗滤液中 COD 的初始浓度为 1044 mg O2/L,NH3-N 为 204 mg/L,浊度为 57 NTU(或 71.25 mg (NH2)2H2SO4/L)。经过 40 分钟的 EC-CBPAC 工艺后,CBPAC 投加量为 5 克/升,COD 和浊度的 pH 值为 5,NH3-N 为 9.5,COD、NH3-N 和浊度的最佳去除率分别为 92%、40% 和 91%。在相同的实验条件下,在不使用 CBPAC 的情况下使用 EC 工艺时,COD、NH3-N 和浊度的去除率分别为 87%、28% 和 54%。在 EC-CBPAC 工艺前后,CBPAC 的布鲁纳-埃美特-泰勒(BET)表面积、孔体积和平均孔直径分别为(888 m2/g、0.498 cm3/g 和 22.28 Å)和(173 m2/g、0.18 cm3/g 和 42.8 Å)。经测定,COD、浊度和 NH3-N 的最佳伪一阶 (PFO) 率常数分别为 3.15 × 10-2、4.77 × 10-2 和 8.8 × 10-3 min-1。随着电流密度从 15 mA/cm2 增加到 25 mA/cm2,能耗、单位能耗和总成本分别从 68.7 kWh/m3 增加到 122.4 kWh/m3、6.948 kWh/kg COD 增加到 15.226 kWh/kg、0.85 美元/kg COD 增加到 1.838 美元/kg。实践点:EC-CBPAC 工艺的 COD、NH3-N 和浊度去除效率高于 EC 工艺。在 pH 值为 5 时,COD 和浊度的最佳去除率分别为 92% 和 91%。与单独使用 EC 相比,EC-CBPAC 工艺对 COD、NH3-N 和浊度的去除率分别提高了 20%、19% 和 38%。浊度、NH3-N 和 COD 的去除率与 PSO 模型的相关性很高(R2 为 0.94-0.99)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Environment Research
Water Environment Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
11 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1928, Water Environment Research (WER) is an international multidisciplinary water resource management journal for the dissemination of fundamental and applied research in all scientific and technical areas related to water quality and resource recovery. WER''s goal is to foster communication and interdisciplinary research between water sciences and related fields such as environmental toxicology, agriculture, public and occupational health, microbiology, and ecology. In addition to original research articles, short communications, case studies, reviews, and perspectives are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Strategy to develop and validate digital droplet PCR methods for global antimicrobial resistance wastewater surveillance. Removal of Fe2+ in coastal aquaculture source water by manganese ores: Batch experiments and breakthrough curve modeling. Biofilm characterization and dynamic simulation of advanced rope media reactor for the treatment of primary effluent. Fate of biosolids-bound PFAS through pyrolysis coupled with thermal oxidation for air emissions control. Insights into the efficiencies of different biological treatment systems for pharmaceuticals removal: A review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1