Being a First Nations baby is not independently associated with low birthweight in a large metropolitan health service.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1111/ajo.13843
Sonia Pervin, Lauren Kearney, Sonita Giudice, Sherry Holzapfel, Tara Denaro, Jodi Dyer, Phillipa E Cole, Leonie Callaway
{"title":"Being a First Nations baby is not independently associated with low birthweight in a large metropolitan health service.","authors":"Sonia Pervin, Lauren Kearney, Sonita Giudice, Sherry Holzapfel, Tara Denaro, Jodi Dyer, Phillipa E Cole, Leonie Callaway","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine low birth weight (LBW) in First Nations babies born in a large metropolitan health service in Queensland, Australia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective population-based study using routinely collected data from administrative data sources. All singleton births in metropolitan health services, Queensland, Australia of ≥20 weeks gestation or at least 400 g birthweight and had information on First Nations status and born between 2019 and 2021 were included. The study measured birthweight and birthweight z-score, and also identified the predictors of LBW. Multivariate regression models were adjusted by demographic, socioeconomic and perinatal factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First Nations babies had higher rates of LBW (11.4% vs 6.9%, P < 0.001), with higher rates of preterm birth (13.9% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001). In all babies, the most important factors contributing to LBW were: maternal smoking after 20 weeks of gestation; maternal pre-pregnancy underweight (body mass index <18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>); nulliparity; socioeconomic disadvantage; geographical remoteness; less frequent antenatal care; history of cannabis use; pre-existing cardiovascular disease; pre-eclampsia; antepartum haemorrhage; and birth outcomes including prematurity and female baby. After adjusting for all contributing factors, no difference in odds of LBW was observed between First Nations and non-First Nation babies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>First Nations status was not an independent factor influencing LBW in this cohort, after adjustment for identifiable factors. The disparity in LBW relates to modifiable risk factors, socioeconomic disadvantage, and prematurity. Upscaling culturally safe maternity care, focusing on modifiable risk factors is required to address LBW in Australian women.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine low birth weight (LBW) in First Nations babies born in a large metropolitan health service in Queensland, Australia.

Materials and methods: A retrospective population-based study using routinely collected data from administrative data sources. All singleton births in metropolitan health services, Queensland, Australia of ≥20 weeks gestation or at least 400 g birthweight and had information on First Nations status and born between 2019 and 2021 were included. The study measured birthweight and birthweight z-score, and also identified the predictors of LBW. Multivariate regression models were adjusted by demographic, socioeconomic and perinatal factors.

Results: First Nations babies had higher rates of LBW (11.4% vs 6.9%, P < 0.001), with higher rates of preterm birth (13.9% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001). In all babies, the most important factors contributing to LBW were: maternal smoking after 20 weeks of gestation; maternal pre-pregnancy underweight (body mass index <18.5 kg/m2); nulliparity; socioeconomic disadvantage; geographical remoteness; less frequent antenatal care; history of cannabis use; pre-existing cardiovascular disease; pre-eclampsia; antepartum haemorrhage; and birth outcomes including prematurity and female baby. After adjusting for all contributing factors, no difference in odds of LBW was observed between First Nations and non-First Nation babies.

Conclusions: First Nations status was not an independent factor influencing LBW in this cohort, after adjustment for identifiable factors. The disparity in LBW relates to modifiable risk factors, socioeconomic disadvantage, and prematurity. Upscaling culturally safe maternity care, focusing on modifiable risk factors is required to address LBW in Australian women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一个大都市的医疗服务机构中,原住民婴儿与出生体重过轻没有独立联系。
目的:研究在澳大利亚昆士兰州一个大都市医疗服务机构出生的原住民婴儿的低出生体重(LBW)情况:这是一项基于人口的回顾性研究,使用了从行政数据源中定期收集的数据。研究纳入了澳大利亚昆士兰州大都市医疗服务机构中所有妊娠期≥20周或出生体重至少为400克、有原住民身份信息且在2019年至2021年间出生的单胎新生儿。该研究测量了出生体重和出生体重 Z 值,并确定了低出生体重儿的预测因素。多变量回归模型根据人口、社会经济和围产期因素进行了调整:结果显示:原住民婴儿的畸形婴儿率较高(11.4% vs 6.9%,P 2);无胎儿;社会经济状况不佳;地理位置偏远;产前护理次数较少;有吸食大麻史;原有心血管疾病;先兆子痫;产前出血;以及包括早产和女婴在内的分娩结局。在对所有诱因进行调整后,观察到原住民婴儿和非原住民婴儿发生低体重儿的几率没有差异:结论:在对可识别因素进行调整后,原住民身份并不是影响该队列中低产婴儿的独立因素。低体重儿的差异与可改变的风险因素、社会经济劣势和早产有关。要解决澳大利亚妇女的低体重问题,就必须扩大文化安全孕产护理,重点关注可改变的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
期刊最新文献
Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey. What good emotional care for miscarriage looks like: A mixed-methods investigation in an Australian private hospital setting. Gender representation in obstetrics and gynaecology leadership. 'It's not a solution to keep telling me to lose weight!' Exploring endometrial cancer survivors' experiences of nutrition and well-being advice: A qualitative study. Vaginoscopy to investigate vaginal bleeding and discharge in prepubertal girls.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1