Cancer research funding in South Asia

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Cancer Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100489
Sehar Salim Virani , Kaleem Sohail Ahmed , Taylor Jaraczewski , Syed Nabeel Zafar
{"title":"Cancer research funding in South Asia","authors":"Sehar Salim Virani ,&nbsp;Kaleem Sohail Ahmed ,&nbsp;Taylor Jaraczewski ,&nbsp;Syed Nabeel Zafar","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The rising burden of cancer significantly influences the global economy and healthcare systems. While local and contextual cancer research is crucial, it is often limited by the availability of funds. In South Asia, with 1.7 million new cancer cases and 1.1 million deaths due to cancer in 2020, understanding cancer research funding trends is pivotal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed funded cancer studies conducted between January 1, 2003, and Dec 31, 2022, using ClinicalTrials.gov, International Cancer Research Partnership (ICRP) Database, NIH World RePORT, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We included funded studies related to all cancer types, conducted in South Asian countries, namely Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 6561 funded cancer studies from South Asia between 2003 and 2022, increasing from 400 studies in 2003‐2007 to 3909 studies in 2018–2022. India had the highest number of funded cancer studies, while Afghanistan, Bhutan, and the Maldives had minimal or no funded cancer research output. Interventional studies (67.3%) were the most common study type funded. The most common cancer sites funded were breast (17.8%), lung (9.9%), oropharyngeal (6.2%), and cervical (5.0%) cancers. On the WHO ICTRP, international funding agencies contributed to a majority of studies (57.5%), except in India where local funding agencies (58.2%) funded more studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study identified gaps in research funding distribution across cancer types and geographic areas in South Asia. This data can be used to optimize the distribution of cancer research funding in South Asia, fostering equitable advancement in cancer research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The rising burden of cancer significantly influences the global economy and healthcare systems. While local and contextual cancer research is crucial, it is often limited by the availability of funds. In South Asia, with 1.7 million new cancer cases and 1.1 million deaths due to cancer in 2020, understanding cancer research funding trends is pivotal.

Methods

We reviewed funded cancer studies conducted between January 1, 2003, and Dec 31, 2022, using ClinicalTrials.gov, International Cancer Research Partnership (ICRP) Database, NIH World RePORT, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We included funded studies related to all cancer types, conducted in South Asian countries, namely Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

Results

We identified 6561 funded cancer studies from South Asia between 2003 and 2022, increasing from 400 studies in 2003‐2007 to 3909 studies in 2018–2022. India had the highest number of funded cancer studies, while Afghanistan, Bhutan, and the Maldives had minimal or no funded cancer research output. Interventional studies (67.3%) were the most common study type funded. The most common cancer sites funded were breast (17.8%), lung (9.9%), oropharyngeal (6.2%), and cervical (5.0%) cancers. On the WHO ICTRP, international funding agencies contributed to a majority of studies (57.5%), except in India where local funding agencies (58.2%) funded more studies.

Conclusion

This study identified gaps in research funding distribution across cancer types and geographic areas in South Asia. This data can be used to optimize the distribution of cancer research funding in South Asia, fostering equitable advancement in cancer research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南亚的癌症研究资金
背景日益沉重的癌症负担严重影响着全球经济和医疗保健系统。尽管因地制宜的癌症研究至关重要,但却往往受到资金供应的限制。我们利用 ClinicalTrials.gov、国际癌症研究合作组织 (ICRP) 数据库、美国国立卫生研究院世界报告 (NIH World RePORT) 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验登记平台 (ICTRP) 对 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间开展的受资助癌症研究进行了审查。我们纳入了在南亚国家(即阿富汗、孟加拉国、不丹、印度、马尔代夫、尼泊尔、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡)开展的与所有癌症类型相关的受资助研究。结果我们发现,2003 年至 2022 年间,南亚有 6561 项癌症研究获得资助,从 2003-2007 年的 400 项增加到 2018-2022 年的 3909 项。印度获得资助的癌症研究数量最多,而阿富汗、不丹和马尔代夫获得资助的癌症研究成果极少或没有。介入性研究(67.3%)是最常见的资助研究类型。获得资助最多的癌症部位是乳腺癌(17.8%)、肺癌(9.9%)、口咽癌(6.2%)和宫颈癌(5.0%)。在世界卫生组织国际癌症研究项目中,国际资助机构资助了大多数研究(57.5%),但印度除外,当地资助机构(58.2%)资助了更多的研究。这些数据可用于优化南亚癌症研究资金的分配,促进癌症研究的公平发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Palliative Care in Turkey: Insights from experts through key informant interviews Is health-related quality of life sufficiently addressed in trials for breast cancer treatments? An assessment based on reimbursement opinions from the French health technology assessment body, 2009–2023 Shaping the future research agenda of Cancer Nursing in Italy: Insights and strategic directions Emergency and non-emergency routes to cancer diagnoses in 2020 and 2021: A Population-based study of 154,863 patients Artificial Intelligence and cancer: Profile of registered clinical trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1