Post-stroke hand gesture recognition via one-shot transfer learning using prototypical networks.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1186/s12984-024-01398-7
Hussein Sarwat, Amr Alkhashab, Xinyu Song, Shuo Jiang, Jie Jia, Peter B Shull
{"title":"Post-stroke hand gesture recognition via one-shot transfer learning using prototypical networks.","authors":"Hussein Sarwat, Amr Alkhashab, Xinyu Song, Shuo Jiang, Jie Jia, Peter B Shull","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01398-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-home rehabilitation systems are a promising, potential alternative to conventional therapy for stroke survivors. Unfortunately, physiological differences between participants and sensor displacement in wearable sensors pose a significant challenge to classifier performance, particularly for people with stroke who may encounter difficulties repeatedly performing trials. This makes it challenging to create reliable in-home rehabilitation systems that can accurately classify gestures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty individuals who suffered a stroke performed seven different gestures (mass flexion, mass extension, wrist volar flexion, wrist dorsiflexion, forearm pronation, forearm supination, and rest) related to activities of daily living. They performed these gestures while wearing EMG sensors on the forearm, as well as FMG sensors and an IMU on the wrist. We developed a model based on prototypical networks for one-shot transfer learning, K-Best feature selection, and increased window size to improve model accuracy. Our model was evaluated against conventional transfer learning with neural networks, as well as subject-dependent and subject-independent classifiers: neural networks, LGBM, LDA, and SVM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our proposed model achieved 82.2% hand-gesture classification accuracy, which was better (P<0.05) than one-shot transfer learning with neural networks (63.17%), neural networks (59.72%), LGBM (65.09%), LDA (63.35%), and SVM (54.5%). In addition, our model performed similarly to subject-dependent classifiers, slightly lower than SVM (83.84%) but higher than neural networks (81.62%), LGBM (80.79%), and LDA (74.89%). Using K-Best features improved the accuracy in 3 of the 6 classifiers used for evaluation, while not affecting the accuracy in the other classifiers. Increasing the window size improved the accuracy of all the classifiers by an average of 4.28%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our proposed model showed significant improvements in hand-gesture recognition accuracy in individuals who have had a stroke as compared with conventional transfer learning, neural networks and traditional machine learning approaches. In addition, K-Best feature selection and increased window size can further improve the accuracy. This approach could help to alleviate the impact of physiological differences and create a subject-independent model for stroke survivors that improves the classification accuracy of wearable sensors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>The study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number CHiCTR1800017568 in 2018/08/04.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01398-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In-home rehabilitation systems are a promising, potential alternative to conventional therapy for stroke survivors. Unfortunately, physiological differences between participants and sensor displacement in wearable sensors pose a significant challenge to classifier performance, particularly for people with stroke who may encounter difficulties repeatedly performing trials. This makes it challenging to create reliable in-home rehabilitation systems that can accurately classify gestures.

Methods: Twenty individuals who suffered a stroke performed seven different gestures (mass flexion, mass extension, wrist volar flexion, wrist dorsiflexion, forearm pronation, forearm supination, and rest) related to activities of daily living. They performed these gestures while wearing EMG sensors on the forearm, as well as FMG sensors and an IMU on the wrist. We developed a model based on prototypical networks for one-shot transfer learning, K-Best feature selection, and increased window size to improve model accuracy. Our model was evaluated against conventional transfer learning with neural networks, as well as subject-dependent and subject-independent classifiers: neural networks, LGBM, LDA, and SVM.

Results: Our proposed model achieved 82.2% hand-gesture classification accuracy, which was better (P<0.05) than one-shot transfer learning with neural networks (63.17%), neural networks (59.72%), LGBM (65.09%), LDA (63.35%), and SVM (54.5%). In addition, our model performed similarly to subject-dependent classifiers, slightly lower than SVM (83.84%) but higher than neural networks (81.62%), LGBM (80.79%), and LDA (74.89%). Using K-Best features improved the accuracy in 3 of the 6 classifiers used for evaluation, while not affecting the accuracy in the other classifiers. Increasing the window size improved the accuracy of all the classifiers by an average of 4.28%.

Conclusion: Our proposed model showed significant improvements in hand-gesture recognition accuracy in individuals who have had a stroke as compared with conventional transfer learning, neural networks and traditional machine learning approaches. In addition, K-Best feature selection and increased window size can further improve the accuracy. This approach could help to alleviate the impact of physiological differences and create a subject-independent model for stroke survivors that improves the classification accuracy of wearable sensors.

Trial registration number: The study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number CHiCTR1800017568 in 2018/08/04.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用原型网络通过一次转移学习识别中风后手势
背景:对于中风幸存者来说,居家康复系统是一种前景广阔的传统疗法潜在替代方案。不幸的是,参与者之间的生理差异和可穿戴传感器的传感器位移对分类器的性能构成了巨大挑战,特别是对于中风患者来说,他们可能会遇到反复进行试验的困难。因此,要创建能准确分类手势的可靠的居家康复系统具有挑战性:方法:20 名中风患者做了 7 个与日常生活相关的不同手势(腕关节屈曲、伸展、腕关节外展、腕关节外屈、前臂前伸、前臂上举和休息)。他们在做这些手势时,前臂上佩戴了肌电图传感器,手腕上也佩戴了FMG传感器和IMU。我们开发了一个基于原型网络的模型,用于单次迁移学习、K-Best 特征选择和增加窗口大小以提高模型的准确性。我们的模型与传统的神经网络迁移学习以及与主体相关和与主体无关的分类器(神经网络、LGBM、LDA 和 SVM)进行了对比评估:结果:我们提出的模型达到了 82.2% 的手势分类准确率,优于 PC结论:与传统的迁移学习、神经网络和传统机器学习方法相比,我们提出的模型明显提高了中风患者的手势识别准确率。此外,K-Best 特征选择和增加窗口大小也能进一步提高准确率。这种方法有助于减轻生理差异的影响,并为中风幸存者创建一个与主体无关的模型,从而提高可穿戴传感器的分类准确性:该研究于2018/08/04在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为CHiCTR1800017568。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of synergy extrapolation and static optimization for estimating multiple unmeasured muscle activations during walking. Immersive virtual reality for learning exoskeleton-like virtual walking: a feasibility study. Instrumented assessment of lower and upper motor neuron signs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using robotic manipulation: an explorative study. Rest the brain to learn new gait patterns after stroke. Effects of virtual reality rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1