Analysis of the 2-Bag Method for the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Retrospective before and after Study.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1177/08971900241262383
Julia Nahle, Sarah Langford, Jeremy Albright, David M Sudekum
{"title":"Analysis of the 2-Bag Method for the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Retrospective before and after Study.","authors":"Julia Nahle, Sarah Langford, Jeremy Albright, David M Sudekum","doi":"10.1177/08971900241262383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a two-bag method compared with a one-bag method for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). We hypothesize that a two-bag method will decrease the incidence of hypoglycemia, when compared with a one-bag method. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients treated for DKA at a Trinity Health institution between 2020 and 2022. A total of 1084 adult patients were included. Patients treated with the one-bag protocol were included in the pre-group, while those treated with the two-bag protocol were included in the post-group. The primary outcome was incidence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose <70 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes included time to anion gap closure, insulin infusion duration, time to HCO3 correction, and incidence of hypokalemia. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant or diagnosed with Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State (HHS), euglycemic DKA, or ketosis from other causes. <b>Results:</b> The incidence of hypoglycemia was 38% in the pre-group and 15.83% in the post-group (<i>P</i> < .001). Patients in the pre-group were on an insulin infusion longer than the post-group (28.37 hours vs 22.17 hours, <i>P</i> < .001). Patients in the pre-group had a slower time to anion gap closure (8.99 hours vs 8.52 hours, <i>P</i> = .021) and had a slower time to HCO3 correction (10.88 hours vs 10.69 hours, <i>P</i> = .004). Between-group incidence of hypokalemia was similar (66.39% vs 60%, <i>P</i> = .079). <b>Conclusions:</b> The two-bag method for the treatment of DKA resulted in improved safety and efficacy outcomes, compared with the one-bag method.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"21-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241262383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a two-bag method compared with a one-bag method for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). We hypothesize that a two-bag method will decrease the incidence of hypoglycemia, when compared with a one-bag method. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients treated for DKA at a Trinity Health institution between 2020 and 2022. A total of 1084 adult patients were included. Patients treated with the one-bag protocol were included in the pre-group, while those treated with the two-bag protocol were included in the post-group. The primary outcome was incidence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose <70 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes included time to anion gap closure, insulin infusion duration, time to HCO3 correction, and incidence of hypokalemia. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant or diagnosed with Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State (HHS), euglycemic DKA, or ketosis from other causes. Results: The incidence of hypoglycemia was 38% in the pre-group and 15.83% in the post-group (P < .001). Patients in the pre-group were on an insulin infusion longer than the post-group (28.37 hours vs 22.17 hours, P < .001). Patients in the pre-group had a slower time to anion gap closure (8.99 hours vs 8.52 hours, P = .021) and had a slower time to HCO3 correction (10.88 hours vs 10.69 hours, P = .004). Between-group incidence of hypokalemia was similar (66.39% vs 60%, P = .079). Conclusions: The two-bag method for the treatment of DKA resulted in improved safety and efficacy outcomes, compared with the one-bag method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病酮症酸中毒治疗的双袋法分析:一项前后回顾性研究
目的:本研究旨在评估双袋法与单袋法治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的有效性和安全性。我们假设,与单袋法相比,双袋法将降低低血糖的发生率。方法:对 2020 年至 2022 年期间在 Trinity Health 机构接受 DKA 治疗的患者进行回顾性病历审查。共纳入了 1084 名成年患者。采用单袋方案治疗的患者被纳入前组,而采用双袋方案治疗的患者被纳入后组。主要结果是低血糖发生率(血糖结果):前组低血糖发生率为 38%,后组低血糖发生率为 15.83%(P < .001)。前期组患者输注胰岛素的时间比后期组长(28.37 小时对 22.17 小时,P < .001)。前期组患者阴离子间隙闭合时间较慢(8.99 小时 vs 8.52 小时,P = .021),HCO3 校正时间较慢(10.88 小时 vs 10.69 小时,P = .004)。组间低钾血症发生率相似(66.39% vs 60%,P = .079)。结论与单袋法相比,双袋法治疗 DKA 的安全性和疗效都有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Care in A Safety Net Hospital: Impact of a Pharmacist Transitional Care Service. Analysis of the 2-Bag Method for the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Retrospective before and after Study. Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Contraception Service at a Safety-Net Health-System. Assessment of a Geriatric Evaluation and Management in the Home (GEMITH) Service at a Quaternary Hospital: A Retrospective Observational Study. The Phenytoin Ataxia Enigma Unveiled "A Case Report''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1