Values of academic integrity in higher medical education.

Q4 Medicine Wiadomosci lekarskie Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36740/WLek202404126
Oleg М Vlasenko, Inna Kucherenko, Maryna Ya Turchyn, Olha Nechushkina, Viacheslav Kobrzhytskyi, Oksana A Hrytsenko
{"title":"Values of academic integrity in higher medical education.","authors":"Oleg М Vlasenko, Inna Kucherenko, Maryna Ya Turchyn, Olha Nechushkina, Viacheslav Kobrzhytskyi, Oksana A Hrytsenko","doi":"10.36740/WLek202404126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: The aim is to identify features of theoretical and empirical research of academic integrity as characteristics of the educational environment of medical higher education institution (hereinafter - HEI).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: A complex of general scientific methods: logical-analytical, dialectical, theoretical-logical, comparative analysis, formalization and generalization, as well as quantitative sociological methods for collecting, processing and analyzing information. The object of the pilot empirical study were domestic medical students of full-time education at the Bogomolets NMU (N=472) and scientific and pedagogical staff who provide teaching of fundamental, specialized and socio-humanitarian disciplines at the university (N=153).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: The values of academic integrity are the moral guideline that reveals the latest ethical demands of society and regulates the educational and scientific activities of all participants in the educational process. Opinions on the primary responsibility for compliance with the rules of academic integrity of a student differ between the surveyed scientific and pedagogical staff and students (p=0.000): the vast majority of the surveyed scientific and pedagogical staff tend to evenly divide the responsibility between a teacher and a student, and the majority of students-respondents noted that the student bears the primary responsibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: Commitment to the principles of integrity motivates both students and teaching staff to act in an academic manner. Therefore, the creation of a methodology for studying the phenomenon of academic integrity in medical higher education institution through the study of attitude of the subjects of educational process to basic values is promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"77 4","pages":"784-789"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202404126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: The aim is to identify features of theoretical and empirical research of academic integrity as characteristics of the educational environment of medical higher education institution (hereinafter - HEI).

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: A complex of general scientific methods: logical-analytical, dialectical, theoretical-logical, comparative analysis, formalization and generalization, as well as quantitative sociological methods for collecting, processing and analyzing information. The object of the pilot empirical study were domestic medical students of full-time education at the Bogomolets NMU (N=472) and scientific and pedagogical staff who provide teaching of fundamental, specialized and socio-humanitarian disciplines at the university (N=153).

Results: Results: The values of academic integrity are the moral guideline that reveals the latest ethical demands of society and regulates the educational and scientific activities of all participants in the educational process. Opinions on the primary responsibility for compliance with the rules of academic integrity of a student differ between the surveyed scientific and pedagogical staff and students (p=0.000): the vast majority of the surveyed scientific and pedagogical staff tend to evenly divide the responsibility between a teacher and a student, and the majority of students-respondents noted that the student bears the primary responsibility.

Conclusion: Conclusions: Commitment to the principles of integrity motivates both students and teaching staff to act in an academic manner. Therefore, the creation of a methodology for studying the phenomenon of academic integrity in medical higher education institution through the study of attitude of the subjects of educational process to basic values is promising.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等医学教育中的学术诚信价值观。
目的目的:旨在确定作为医学高等院校(以下简称高校)教育环境特征的学术诚信的理论和实证研究特点:材料与方法:一般科学方法综合体:逻辑分析法、辩证法、理论逻辑法、比较分析法、形式化和概括化,以及收集、处理和分析信息的定量社会学方法。试验性实证研究的对象是波戈莫列茨国立医科大学全日制教育的国内医科学生(472 人)以及在该校提供基础学科、专业学科和社会人文学科教学的科研和教学人员(153 人):结果:结果:学术诚信价值观是道德准则,揭示了社会最新的道德要求,规范了教育过程中所有参与者的教育和科研活动。被调查的科研和教学人员与学生对学生遵守学术诚信规则的主要责任的看法不同(P=0.000):绝大多数被调查的科研和教学人员倾向于将责任平均分配给教师和学生,而大多数学生指出学生承担主要责任:结论对诚信原则的承诺激励着学生和教师以学术的方式行事。因此,通过研究教育过程中主体对基本价值观的态度,创建一种研究高等医学教育机构学术诚信现象的方法是很有前途的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wiadomosci lekarskie
Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
482
期刊最新文献
Abuse of right during application of coercive medical measures in criminal proceedings. Aggressive parenting: social, medical and legal aspects. Clinical classification of liver cirrhosis - a way to plan individual definitive treatment. Comparative analysis of the quality of life of women who left the territory of Ukraine during the ongoing Russia - Ukraine war and women who stayed at their homes. COVID-19 associated anosmia in pediatric patients: subject publications review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1