Natural effects with a recanting witness: non-identifiability or meaningless estimand?

IF 4.7 2区医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001768

Ian Shrier

引用次数: 0

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

证人反悔的自然效应：不可识别性还是无意义的估计？

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

3.70%

发文量

177

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.

期刊最新文献

Maternal health during the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S.: an interrupted time series analysis. Interpreting Violations of Falsification Tests in the Context of Multiple Proposed Instrumental Variables. Outcome of Pregnancy Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Preterm Birth. Synthesizing Subject-matter Expertise for Variable Selection in Causal Effect Estimation: A Case Study. Ambient Air Pollution Exposures and Child Executive Function: A US Multicohort Study.