Meta-analysis of the prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in prison: A comment on Fazel and Favril (2024) and reanalysis of the data

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1002/cbm.2347
Stéphanie Baggio, Orestis Efthimiou
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in prison: A comment on Fazel and Favril (2024) and reanalysis of the data","authors":"Stéphanie Baggio,&nbsp;Orestis Efthimiou","doi":"10.1002/cbm.2347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Fazel and Favril presented a reanalysis of our previously published systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in prison.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The current paper addresses some of the criticisms of Fazel and Favril on our meta-analysis and presents a reanalysis of the data, focusing on adult detained persons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a meta—regression on 28 studies (<i>n</i> = 7710) to estimae the pooled prevalence of ADHD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>This reanalysis yielded a pooled estimate of 22.2% for the prevalence of ADHD (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.7; 28.6), which disagrees with the estimate given by Fazel and Favril (8.3%, 95% CI: 3.8; 12.8).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We argue that the ADHD prevalence provided by Fazel and Favril was an underestimate due to their use of too restrictive exclusion criteria and suboptimal analysis methods. Our reanalysis on detained adults suggests a higher ADHD prevalence, which highlights the need to diagnose and treat ADHD in prison.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47362,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health","volume":"34 4","pages":"385-390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cbm.2347","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbm.2347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fazel and Favril presented a reanalysis of our previously published systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in prison.

Aims

The current paper addresses some of the criticisms of Fazel and Favril on our meta-analysis and presents a reanalysis of the data, focusing on adult detained persons.

Methods

We conducted a meta—regression on 28 studies (n = 7710) to estimae the pooled prevalence of ADHD.

Results

This reanalysis yielded a pooled estimate of 22.2% for the prevalence of ADHD (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.7; 28.6), which disagrees with the estimate given by Fazel and Favril (8.3%, 95% CI: 3.8; 12.8).

Conclusion

We argue that the ADHD prevalence provided by Fazel and Favril was an underestimate due to their use of too restrictive exclusion criteria and suboptimal analysis methods. Our reanalysis on detained adults suggests a higher ADHD prevalence, which highlights the need to diagnose and treat ADHD in prison.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监狱中注意力缺陷多动障碍患病率的元分析:对 Fazel 和 Favril(2024 年)的评论以及对数据的重新分析。
背景:法泽尔和法夫里尔对我们之前发表的关于监狱中注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患病率的系统综述和荟萃分析进行了重新分析。目的:本文回应了法泽尔和法夫里尔对我们的荟萃分析提出的一些批评,并对数据进行了重新分析,重点关注成年被拘留者:我们对 28 项研究(n = 7710)进行了元回归,以估计多动症的总体患病率:结果:重新分析得出的ADHD患病率总体估计值为22.2%(95%置信区间[CI]:15.7;28.6),这与Fazel和Favril给出的估计值(8.3%,95% CI:3.8;12.8)不同:我们认为,Fazel 和 Favril 提供的多动症患病率被低估了,这是因为他们使用了过于严格的排除标准和不理想的分析方法。我们对被拘留的成年人进行的重新分析表明,多动症的患病率更高,这凸显了在监狱中诊断和治疗多动症的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health – CBMH – aims to publish original material on any aspect of the relationship between mental state and criminal behaviour. Thus, we are interested in mental mechanisms associated with offending, regardless of whether the individual concerned has a mental disorder or not. We are interested in factors that influence such relationships, and particularly welcome studies about pathways into and out of crime. These will include studies of normal and abnormal development, of mental disorder and how that may lead to offending for a subgroup of sufferers, together with information about factors which mediate such a relationship.
期刊最新文献
Addiction behind bars: Swiss symposium insights. Exploration of a virtual reality exercise to help train police with responding to mental health crises in the community. Barriers to discharge: A retrospective study of factors associated with stays of longer than 2 years in a French secure hospital unit. An exploration into the prevalence and experience of neurodiversity among staff at a UK high-secure psychiatric hospital. Low sense of mattering in society and delinquency among young people: An initial investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1