How did we get here? Evolution of specifications grading in a required skills-based course series

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102124
Lori H. Dupree , Jill M. Augustine , Susan W. Miller
{"title":"How did we get here? Evolution of specifications grading in a required skills-based course series","authors":"Lori H. Dupree ,&nbsp;Jill M. Augustine ,&nbsp;Susan W. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Specifications grading is a mastery-based grading approach to unlock student potential and empower students to focus on learning goals while receiving and acting on meaningful feedback. Within specifications grading, bundles are created to group assignments and assessments. Based on student achievement within each bundle, overall course grade is determined. This article describes the development and implementation of a specifications grading schema in a required skills-based course series, along with lessons learned.</p></div><div><h3>Educational activity and setting</h3><p>In a longitudinal course series with both a didactic and lab component, specifications grading was utilized for determination of the overall course grade. Key components of the specifications grading schema were defined by assignment bundles. Assignment bundles aligned with knowledge and skills taught and assessed in each course and also included summative capstone assessments. Each bundle was assigned a numeric grade linked to a letter grade which determined the students' final grade in the course.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Following first course offerings, several changes to the specifications grading schema were made to improve tracking of assignments and activities, to improve consistency across courses, and to aid in final course grade determination. All quizzes were changed to optional, formative quizzes to encourage student accountability. Additional changes were made to the processes of capstone remediation and reassessment, which led to changes in language of the grading schema.</p></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><p>Developing and implementing specifications grading was a crucial first step in building a required skills-based course series, which led to further refinement and improvement for future course offerings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"16 9","pages":"Article 102124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724001564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Specifications grading is a mastery-based grading approach to unlock student potential and empower students to focus on learning goals while receiving and acting on meaningful feedback. Within specifications grading, bundles are created to group assignments and assessments. Based on student achievement within each bundle, overall course grade is determined. This article describes the development and implementation of a specifications grading schema in a required skills-based course series, along with lessons learned.

Educational activity and setting

In a longitudinal course series with both a didactic and lab component, specifications grading was utilized for determination of the overall course grade. Key components of the specifications grading schema were defined by assignment bundles. Assignment bundles aligned with knowledge and skills taught and assessed in each course and also included summative capstone assessments. Each bundle was assigned a numeric grade linked to a letter grade which determined the students' final grade in the course.

Findings

Following first course offerings, several changes to the specifications grading schema were made to improve tracking of assignments and activities, to improve consistency across courses, and to aid in final course grade determination. All quizzes were changed to optional, formative quizzes to encourage student accountability. Additional changes were made to the processes of capstone remediation and reassessment, which led to changes in language of the grading schema.

Summary

Developing and implementing specifications grading was a crucial first step in building a required skills-based course series, which led to further refinement and improvement for future course offerings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们是如何走到这一步的?以技能为基础的必修课程系列中规格分级的演变
背景和目的 "规格分级 "是一种基于掌握情况的分级方法,旨在挖掘学生的潜能,让学生在接受有意义的反馈并根据反馈采取行动的同时,能够专注于学习目标。在 "规格分级 "中,将作业和评估分组。根据学生在每个捆绑包中的成绩,确定课程总成绩。本文介绍了在一门以技能为基础的必修课程系列中开发和实施规格评分模式的情况,以及所汲取的经验教训。规范评分模式的关键部分由作业捆绑定义。作业捆绑与每门课程教授和评估的知识和技能相一致,还包括终结性顶点评估。在首次开设课程后,对规范评分模式进行了一些修改,以改进作业和活动的跟踪,提高各门课程的一致性,并帮助确定课程的最终成绩。所有测验都改为可选的形成性测验,以鼓励学生承担责任。对顶点课程的补救和重新评估过程进行了额外的修改,这导致了评分模式语言的变化。摘要开发和实施规范评分是建立以技能为基础的必修课程系列的关键性第一步,这导致了未来课程的进一步完善和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preceptor perspectives on disability-related accommodations in pharmacy experiential education Practice transformation starts in the classroom: Mapping practice change learning in a PharmD program Keeping pace in the age of innovation: The perspective of Dutch pharmaceutical science students on the position of machine learning training in an undergraduate curriculum Live and learn: Utilizing MyDispense to increase student knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1